SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 12 Sayı: 4

Vaporizing foil actuator welding prototype manufacturing and applications risk analysis

Buharlaştırılmış folyo aktüatör kaynağı prototip imalatı ve uygulamaları risk analizi

Ganime Tuğba Önder(CUKUROVA UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-7504-7394
Mustafa Kemal Külekci(TARSUS UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-5829-3489
Pages
1079–1091
Publication Date
2023-10-15
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thanks to the measures taken the situations that may result in serious accidents, fire, explosion, loss of limb, and even death that may occur during the experiment have been brought under control and VFAW applications have been made safer.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was conducted to examine risk levels for Vaporizing Foil Actuator Welding (VFAW) prototype manufacturing and applications.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A risk analysis was carried out by using the L-type matrix method to detect hazards and risks in newly developing VFAW applications. 60 risks were identified for VFAW, 37 of which were high and 23 were moderate.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thanks to the measures taken the situations that may result in serious accidents, fire, explosion, loss of limb, and even death that may occur during the experiment have been brought under control and VFAW applications have been made safer.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:İş güvenliği ve sağlığı · Buharlaştırılmış folyo aktüatör kaynağı · Risk değerlendirmesi

Abstract

This study was conducted to examine risk levels for Vaporizing Foil Actuator Welding (VFAW) prototype manufacturing and applications. A risk analysis was carried out by using the L-type matrix method to detect hazards and risks in newly developing VFAW applications. 60 risks were identified for VFAW, 37 of which were high and 23 were moderate. To reduce the risk and occupational accidents to the lowest possible level; a measuring instrument that can continuously monitor current and voltage values, a remote detonation system and a discharge mechanism have been added to the prototype system. Thanks to the measures taken the situations that may result in serious accidents, fire, explosion, loss of limb, and even death that may occur during the experiment have been brought under control and VFAW applications have been made safer.

Özet

Bu çalışma, Buharlaştırılmış Folyo Aktüatör Kaynağı (VFAW) prototip üretimi ve uygulamaları için risk düzeylerini incelemek amacıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Yeni geliştirilen VFAW uygulamalarında tehlike ve risklerin tespiti için L tipi matris yöntemi kullanılarak risk analizi yapılmıştır. VFAW için 37'si yüksek ve 23'ü orta olmak üzere 60 risk belirlendi. Riski ve iş kazalarını mümkün olan en düşük seviyeye indirmek için; prototip sisteme akım ve gerilim değerlerini sürekli takip edebilen ölçü aleti, uzaktan patlatma sistemi ve deşarj mekanizması eklenmiştir. Alınan önlemler sayesinde deney sırasında oluşabilecek ciddi kaza, yangın, patlama, uzuv kaybı ve hatta ölümle sonuçlanabilecek durumlar kontrol altına alınmış ve VFAW uygulamaları daha güvenli hale getirilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Önder, G. T., Külekci, M. K. (2023). Vaporizing foil actuator welding prototype manufacturing and applications risk analysis. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 4, 1079–1091. https://doi.org/10.28948/ngumuh.1241634

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (50)

  1. K. Horozoğlu, İş kazalarının iş sağlığı ve güvenliği açısından analizi, Karabük University Journal of Institute of Social Sciences, 8(2), 265-281, 2019.
  2. R. Malomane, I. Musonda, C. S. Okoro, The opportunities and challenges associated with the implementation of fourth industrial revolution technologies to manage health and safety, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(2),846, 2022. doi:10.3390/ijerph19020846
  3. R. İ. Dosun, Çelik konstrüksiyon imalatı yapan bir iş yerinde iş sağlığı ve güvenliği ve risk analizi çalışması, Master Thesis, Institute of Health Sciences, Istanbul Yeni Yüzyıl University, Istanbul, 2018.
  4. N. Panchanatham, V. Jayalakshmi, A study on employee safety and workplace hazards in relation to performance of jewellery manufacturing industries, Journal of Contemporary Research in Management, 11(3), 1, 2016.
  5. Z. Aziz, Bir metal işleme işletmesinde iş güvenliği ve risk analizi, Master Thesis, Institute of Science and Technology, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, 2019.
  6. S. Alçin, Üretim Için Yeni Bir Izlek: Sanayi 4.0., Journal of life Economics, 3(2), 19-30, 2016.
  7. E. Ünal, İmalat sektöründe iş güvenliği ve risk analizi, Master Thesis, Trakya University, Institute of Science and Technology, 2014.
  8. M. Erdaş, Metal imalat sektörü iş sağlığı ve güvenliği risklerinin değerlendirilmesi, Ph.D. Thesis, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Institute of Science and Technology, 2020.
  9. T. Teker, D. Gençdoğan, Türkiye’de kaynakçılık mesleğinde meydana gelen iş kazaları ve güvenlik önlemleri, Journal of Engineering Sciences of Adiyaman University, 7(12), 34-44, 2020.
  10. G. Serin, M. Çuhadar, İş güvenliği ve sağlığı yönetim sistemi, Journal of Technical Sciences, 5(2), 44-59, 2015.
  11. M. K. Harris, Welding health and safety: a field guide for oehs professionals, Welding Health and Safety: A Field Guide for OEHS Professionals, AIHA, Virginia, 2002.
  12. F. Golbabaei, M. Khadem, Air pollution in welding processes—assessment and control methods, Current Air Quality Issues, 33-63, 2015. doi:10.5772/59793.
  13. D. A. Lombardi et al., 2005. Welding Related Occupational Eye Injuries: A Narrative Analysis, Injury Prevention, 11(3), 174-179. doi:10.1136/ip.2004.007088
  14. V. P. Sudhashree et al., New technologies, new hazards: need for evidence base: a report on the health status and safety measures in a biotechnology factory in bangalore, Indian Journal of Community Medicine, 32(3), 178, 2007.
  15. S. Karamik, U.Seker, İşletmelerde, İş güvenliğinin verimlilik üzerine etkilerinin değerlendirilmesi. Gazi University Journal of Science Part C: Design and Technology, 3(4), 575-584, 2015.
  16. A. Turan, Kaynak işlerinde iş güvenliği, Welding Congress IX. National Congress and Exhibition Proceedings, Engineer and Machinery, 57, 673, 411-422, 2015.
  17. B. Gulhan, M. Ilhan, E. Civil, Occupational accidents and affecting factors of metal industry in a factory in Ankara, Turkish Journal of Public Health, 10(2), 76-85, 2012.10.20518/tjph.173067.https://doi.org/10.20518/tjph.173067
  18. K. Misiurek, B. Misiurek, Methodology of improving occupational safety in the construction industry on the basis of the twi program, Safety science, 92, 225-231, 2017. 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.10.017
  19. D.Ç. Taşdemir, Risk değerlendirme metodolojileri: belirlenen nitel yöntemler, Uluslararası Sosyal ve Beşerî Bilimler Kongresi Kongre Kitabı, 60-65, 2021.
  20. M.B. Wanjari, P. Wankhede, Occupational hazards associated with welding work that influence health status of welders, International Journal of Current Research and Review, 12(23), 51-55, 2020. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31782/IJCRR.2020.122303
  21. N. A. Shuaib et al., Assessing risks and control measures on a welding workshop in Malaysia, In AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 2339, No. 1, p. 020218). AIP Publishing LLC, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0044249
  22. Y.O. Tagurum et al., Awareness of occupational hazards and utilization of PPE amongst welders in jos metropolis, Nigeria, International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 6(7), 2227-2233, 2018. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20182808
  23. S. Ersoy, E. Ç. Kaya, Bir kamu üniversitesi gıda mühendisliği laboratuvarları risk analiz uygulaması, Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(4), 411-423, 2019.
  24. D. Celayir, İç denetim ve risk değerlendirme, Yalın yayıncılık, Editör Hatice Bahtiyar, İstanbul, 2021.
  25. G. Caner Akın et al., Yeni bir risk değerlendirme yöntemi ile tersane işletmelerinin sınıflandırılması, Busıness & Management Studıes: An Internatıonal Journal, 8 (1), pp. 2372-2384, 2020. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v8i1.1349
  26. S. Selçuk, H. H. Selim, Mücevherat sektöründe kullanılan iş sağlığı ve güvenliği risk analiz yöntemlerinden l tipi matris yöntemi, İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Teknoloji ve Uygulamalı Bilimler Dergisi, 1(1), 21-27, 2018.
  27. G.C. William and M.A. Levine. Classification of wire explosions. Journal of applied physics 31.7 (1960): 1298-1298. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1735823
  28. R.C. Weingart, et al. Acceleration of thin flyers by exploding metal foils: application to initiation studies.[PETN, TATB, PBX-7404, NM]. No. UCRL-77610; CONF-760805-10. California Univ., Livermore (USA). Lawrence Livermore Lab., 1976.
  29. A. Vivek et al., Vaporizing foil actuator: a tool for collision welding, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 213(12), 2304-2311, 2013. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.07.006
  30. M.E. Önder, Servet common health and safety unit, hazard and risk assessment procedure, Adana. 'Personal communication', 2022.
  31. F. Salguero-Caparrós et al., Management of legal compliance in occupational health and safety. a literature review, Safety Science, 121, 111-118,2020. doi:10.10 16/j.ssci.2019.08.033
  32. A. Vivek et al., Accessing collision welding process window for titanium/copper welds with vaporizing foil actuators and grooved targets, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 214(8), 1583-1589, 2014. DOİ: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.03.007
  33. A. Vivek et al., Solid state impact welding of bmg and copper by vaporizing foil actuator welding, Materials Science and Engineering: A, 634, 14-19, 2015. DOİ: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2015.03.012
  34. S. R. Hansen, A. Vivek, G. S. Daehn, Impact welding of aluminum alloys 6061 and 5052 by vaporizing foil actuators: heat-affected zone size and peel strength, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 137(5), 2015. doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4030934
  35. M. Hahn et al., Vaporizing foil actuator welding as a competing technology to magnetic pulse welding, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 230, 8-20, 2016. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.11.010
  36. D. Pereira et al., Magnetic pulse welding: machine optimisation for aluminium tubular joints production. Science and Technology of Welding and Joining, 23.2 (2018):172-179. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13621718.2017.1355425
  37. M. Watanabe, et al. Interfacial microstructure of aluminum/metallic glass lap joints fabricated by magnetic pulse welding. Mater Trans. 2009;50(6):1279–1285. doi:https://doi.org/10.23 20/ matertrans.ME200835
  38. Y. Lu et al., Dissimilar metal joining of aluminium to zinc-coated steel by ultrasonic plus resistance spot welding–microstructure and mechanical properties. Science and Technology of Welding and Joining 25.3 (2020): 218-227. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/ 136217 18.2019.1667051
  39. K. Sajun Prasad, et al. Recent Developments of Vaporizing Foil Actuator Technique for Manufacturing Applications. In: Forming the Future: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on the Technology of Plasticity. Springer International Publishing, 2021. p. 1341-1350.
  40. A. Vivek, and G. S. Daehn. Vaporizing foil actuator: a versatile tool for high energy-rate metal working. Procedia Engineering 81 (2014): 2129-2134. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.297
  41. B., Liu, A. Vivek, G.S. Daehn, Joining sheet aluminum AA6061-T4 to cast magnesium AM60B by vaporizing foil actuator welding: input energy, interface, and strength, Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 30, 75-82, 2017. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jmapro. 2017.09.008
  42. S. Chen et al., Interfacial characteristics of Ti/Al joint by vaporizing foil actuator welding, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 263, 73-81, 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.08.004
  43. Z. Meng et al., Joining performance and microstructure of the 2024/7075 aluminium alloys welded joints by vaporizing foil actuator welding, Journal of Wuhan University of Technology-Mater. Sci. Ed., 34(2), 368-372, 2019. DOI: https: //doi. org/10.1007/s11595-019-2061-7
  44. Department of Defence (DoD), Standard Practice for System Safety, MILSTD-882D, 2000.
  45. M.B. Wanjari, P. Wankhede, Occupational hazards associated with welding work that influence health status of welders, International Journal of Current Research and Review, 12(23), 51-55, 2020. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31782/IJCRR.2020.122303
  46. G. Caner Akın et al., Yeni bir risk değerlendirme yöntemi ile tersane işletmelerinin sınıflandırılması, Busıness & Management Studıes: An Internatıonal Journal, 8 (1), pp. 2372-2384, 2020. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v8i1.1349
  47. F. Salguero-Caparrós et al., Management of legal compliance in occupational health and safety. a literature review, Safety Science, 121, 111-118,2020. doi:10.10 16/j.ssci.2019.08.033
  48. M. Hahn et al., Vaporizing foil actuator welding as a competing technology to magnetic pulse welding, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 230, 8-20, 2016. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.11.010
  49. D. Pereira et al., Magnetic pulse welding: machine optimisation for aluminium tubular joints production. Science and Technology of Welding and Joining, 23.2 (2018):172-179. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13621718.2017.1355425
  50. B., Liu, A. Vivek, G.S. Daehn, Joining sheet aluminum AA6061-T4 to cast magnesium AM60B by vaporizing foil actuator welding: input energy, interface, and strength, Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 30, 75-82, 2017. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jmapro. 2017.09.008