Journals / lnternational Journal of Geography and Geography Education / 2023 / Sayı: 50

Determination of thermal comfort conditions of Zigana winter tourism center according to skiers and visitors

Zigana kış turizm merkezinin termal konfor koşullarının kayakçılara ve ziyaretçilere göre belirlenmesi

Pages
297–312
Publication Date
2023-10-08
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is recommended to consider this study for tourism activities in ZWTC.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Climatic conditions play a decisive role in the realization of tourism activities.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As a result of the study, cold, risky conditions for skiers from November to March in the period from the 10th day of January to the 10th day of February are effective, while other days can be expressed as comfortable.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is recommended to consider this study for tourism activities in ZWTC.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kış Turizmi · Turizm İklimi · Termal Konfor

Abstract

Climatic conditions play a decisive role in the realization of tourism activities. This study aims to determine the thermal comfort conditions of the Zigana Winter Tourism Center (ZWTC) for skiers (active skiers) and visitors (wanderers). The study used hourly measurement data from the meteorology station at ZWTC. Thermal comfort conditions were determined with WCI (Wind Chill Index) from simple indices and MPET (Modified Physiologically Equivalent Temperature) indices from complex indices. As a result of the study, cold, risky conditions for skiers from November to March in the period from the 10th day of January to the 10th day of February are effective, while other days can be expressed as comfortable. It has been determined that the hours between 10:00 and 16:00 during the day are suitable. There are cold risks throughout the entire period for visitors who do not do any activity. It is recommended to consider this study for tourism activities in ZWTC.

Özet

Turizm faaliyetlerinin yapılabilmesinde iklim koşullarının belirleyici bir rolü vardır. Bu çalışma Zigana Kış Turizmi Merkezi’nin (ZKTM) kayakçılar (aktif kayak yapan) ve ziyaretçiler (gezip-dolaşan) açısından termal konfor koşullarının belirlenmesini amaçlamaktadır. Çalışmada ZKTM’de bulunan meteoroloji istasyonunun saatlik ölçüm verileri kullanılmıştır. Termal konfor koşulları basit indislerden RSİ (Rüzgâr Soğuğu İndisi) ve karmaşık indislerden DFES (Düzenlenmiş Fizyolojik Eşdeğer Sıcaklık İndisi) indisleri ile belirlenmiştir. Çalışma sonucunda ZKTM’de kayakçılar için kasım ayından mart ayına kadar ki dönemde ocak ayının 10. gününden şubat ayının 10. gününe kadar ki dönem soğuk riskli koşullar etkili olurken diğer günler konforlu olarak ifade edilebilir. Gün içerisinde saat 10:00 ile 16:00 arasının uygun olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Herhangi bir aktivite yapmayan ziyaretçiler için ise tüm dönem boyunca soğuk riskler bulunmaktadır. ZKTM’deki turizm faaliyetleri için bu çalışmanın dikkate alınması önerilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAĞLAK, S. (2023). Determination of thermal comfort conditions of Zigana winter tourism center according to skiers and visitors. lnternational Journal of Geography and Geography Education, Sayı: 50, 297–312. https://ajindex.com/articles/967215

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Auliciems, A., & Szokolay, S. V. (2007). Passive and low energy architecture international: Design tools and techniques—Note 3. Brisbane, Australia: Dept. of Architecture, Univ. of Queensland. Blazejczyk, K., Baranowski, J., & Blazejczyk, A. (2018). Climate related diseases. Current regional variability and projections to the year 2100. Quaestiones Geographicae, 37(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2018- 0003 Bulut, İ., & Yildirim, M. (2018). Yakakent tourism potential. Studies Of The Ottoman Domain, 8(15), 1–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.19039/sotod.2018.86
  2. Çağlak, S. (2021). Effects and possible consequences of climate change on bioclimatic comfort conditions. (Unpublished doctoral thesis, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Graduate School of Education, Samsun). Çağlak, S., Özlü, T., & Şahin, K. (2017). Investigation of tourism in terms of bioclimatologic conditions of Amasya. Studies of The Ottoman Domain, 7(13), 266–284. https://doi.org/10.19039/sotod.2017.74
  3. Çalışkan, O., & Matzarakis, A. (2013). The climate and bioclimate of Nevşehir from the perspective of tourism. Advances in Meteorology, Climatology and Atmospheric Physics, 397–402. https:// doi.org/ 10.1007/978-3- 642-29172-2_56 Chen, Y.-C., & Matzarakis, A. (2018). Modified physiologically equivalent temperature—Basics and applications for western European climate. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 132, 1275–1289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-017-2158-x de Freitas, C. R., & Grigorieva, E. A. (2015). A comprehensive catalogue and classification of human thermal climate indices. International Journal of Biometeorology, 59, 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-014- 0819-3
  4. Demiroğlu, O. C. (2013). The effect of climate change on winter tourism. (Unpublished doctoral thesis, İstanbul University, Social Sciences Institute, İstanbul). Doğaner, S. (1997). The main factors affecting winter tourism in the mountainous areas of Turkey. Journal of Geography, 5, 19–44.
  5. Doğaner, S. (2001). Turkey tourism geography. Çantay Bookstore, İstanbul.
  6. Donaldson, G. C., & Keatinge, W. R. (2002). Excess winter mortality: Influenza or cold stress? Observational study. Bmj, 324(7329), 89–90. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7329.89
  7. Driscoll, D. M. (1992). Thermal comfort indexes. Current uses and abuses. Nat. Weather Digest, 17(4), 33–38.
  8. Epstein, Y., & Moran, D. S. (2006). Thermal comfort and the heat stress indices. Industrial Health, 44(3), 388– 398. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.44.388
  9. Evren, S., Zeybek, H. İ., &