Journals / Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty / 2023 / Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1

AN INTEGRATED MODEL APPROACH WITH FUZZY MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODS FOR THE SELECTION OF THIRD PARTY LOGISTICS FIRM IN THE FOOD INDUSTRY

GIDA SEKTÖRÜNDE ÜÇÜNCÜ PARTİ LOJİSTİK FİRMA SEÇİMİNDE BULANIK ÇOK KRİTERLİ KARAR VERME TEKNİKLERİYLE ENTEGRE BİR MODEL YAKLAŞIMI

Pages
57–80
Publication Date
2023-03-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

And three new criteria; namely, portage price, hygiene and vehicle were added to the related literature which did not exist before.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was to determine third party logistics company selection and evaluation criteria and to help make the most suitable selection among the alternatives in the food sector.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As a result of the analyses made and the findings obtained, technology, delivery performance and quality were found as the criteria having the highest scores in terms of effectiveness.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:And three new criteria; namely, portage price, hygiene and vehicle were added to the related literature which did not exist before.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Tedarikçi Seçimi · Üçüncü Parti Lojistik · Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Teknikleri

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine third party logistics company selection and evaluation criteria and to help make the most suitable selection among the alternatives in the food sector. Another purpose was to present a mixed model by integrating fuzzy multi criteria decision making methods in third-party logistics company selection process. The combination of fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods were used in this study. A decision network was created by evaluating the interactions between the criteria determined depending on the decision goal. This study was conducted in a large scale company producing milk and dairy products in food sector. As a result of the analyses made and the findings obtained, technology, delivery performance and quality were found as the criteria having the highest scores in terms of effectiveness. In addition, it was also determined that the most affected criterion among the criteria was the company image. The S2 Company was selected as the best third-party logistics company as a result of the evaluation of alternatives. The integrated fuzzy methods used in this study were used for the first time in the selection and evaluation of third-party logistics companies. And three new criteria; namely, portage price, hygiene and vehicle were added to the related literature which did not exist before.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, üçüncü parti lojistik firma seçimi ve değerlendirme kriterlerini belirlemek ve gıda sektöründeki alternatifler arasından en uygun seçimin yapılmasına yardımcı olmaktır. Diğer bir amaç ise, üçüncü parti lojistik firma seçim sürecinde bulanık çok kriterli karar verme yöntemlerini entegre ederek karma bir model sunmaktır. Bu çalışmada bulanık DEMATEL, bulanık ANP ve bulanık TOPSIS yöntemlerinin kombinasyonu kullanılmıştır. Karar amacına bağlı olarak belirlenen kriterler arasındaki etkileşimler değerlendirilerek bir karar ağı oluşturulmuştur. Bu çalışma gıda sektöründe süt ve süt ürünleri üreten büyük ölçekli bir firmada yapılmıştır. Yapılan analizler ve elde edilen bulgular sonucunda teknoloji, teslimat performansı ve kalite en çok etkileyen kriterler olarak bulunmuştur. Bununla birlikte kriterler arasından en çok etkilenen kriterin de firma imajı olduğu tespit edilmiştir. S2 olarak isimlendirilen firma, alternatiflerin değerlendirilmesi sonucunda en iyi üçüncü parti lojistik firması olarak önerilmiştir. Bu çalışmada kullanılan bütünleşik bulanık yöntemler üçüncü parti lojistik firmalarının seçiminde ve değerlendirilmesinde ilk kez kullanılmıştır. Ayrıca bu çalışmada literatürde rastlanmamış üç adet yeni kriter tespit edilmiş ve ilgili literatüre ufak da olsa katkıda bulunulmaya çalışılmıştır. Bu kriterler; hamaliye bedeli, hijyen ve araç tedarik yeteneğidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERDEM, M. B., GÖKSU, N., DOĞAN, N. Ö. (2023). AN INTEGRATED MODEL APPROACH WITH FUZZY MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODS FOR THE SELECTION OF THIRD PARTY LOGISTICS FIRM IN THE FOOD INDUSTRY. Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1, 57–80. https://ajindex.com/articles/966565

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Aguezzoul, A., Rabenasoloo, B. & Jolly-Desodt, A. M., (2006). Multicriteria decision aid tool for third-party logistics providers’ selection, In International Conference Service Systems and Service Management (ICSSSM). Akman, G. & Alkan, A., (2006). Measurement of supplier performance at supply chain management by using fuzzy AHP method: a study at automotive subcontractor industry, Istanbul Ticaret University Journal of science, 5(9), 23-46.
  2. Alkhatib, S. F., Darlington, R. & Nguyen, T. T., (2015). Logistics service providers (lsps) evaluation and selection: literature review and framework development, Strategic Outsourcing: An International Journal, 8(1), 102-134.
  3. Altan, S., & Karaş Aydın, E. (2015). An Integrated model approach with fuzzy DEMATEL and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for the selection of third party logistic firm, Suleyman Demirel University, Journal of Faculty of Economics & Administrative Sciences, 20(3), 99-119.
  4. Bajec, P., & Tuljak-Suban, D. (2019). An Integrated Analytic Hierarchy Process-Slack Based Measure-Data Envelopment Analysis Model for Evaluating the Efficiency of Logistics Service Providers Considering Undesirable Performance Criteria, Sustainability, 11(8), Bianchini, A., (2018). 3PL Provider Selection by AHP and TOPSIS methodology, Benchmarking: An International Journal, (just-accepted), 235-252.
  5. Bottani, E. & Rizzi, A., (2006). A fuzzy TOPSIS methodology to support outsourcing of logistics services, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 11(4), 294-308.
  6. Büyüközkan, G. & Çifçi, G., (2012). A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers, Expert Systems with Applications, 9(3), 3000-3011.
  7. Chang, B., Chang, C.W. & Wu, C.H., (2011). Fuzzy DEMATEL method for developing supplier selection criteria, Expert Systems with Applications, 38(3), 1850-1858.
  8. Chen, C. T., (2000). Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114(1), 1-9.
  9. Chen, J.K. & Chen, S., (2010). Using A novel conjunctive MCDM approach based on DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP, and TOPSIS as an innovation support system for Taiwanese higher education, Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 1981-1990.
  10. Cheng, E. W., & Li, H. (2004). Contractor selection using the analytic network process, Construction Management and Economics, 22(10),1021-1032.
  11. Chiang, Z., & Tzeng, G. H. (2009). A third party logistics provider for the best selection in fuzzy dynamic decision environments