Journals / Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty / 2023 / Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2

INSTANT MESSAGING GROUPS: IS IT CONVENIENCE OR TORTURE?

ANLIK MESAJLAŞMA GRUPLARI: KOLAYLIK MI EZIYET Mİ?

Pages
995–1019
Publication Date
2023-08-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

To take precautions against these actions, it has been revealed that training on the use of instant messaging applications and social media should be disseminated, awareness-raising activities should be organized and reactions should be taken to establish the right communication.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The study aims to examine the disturbing situations, and the emotions and thoughts of the participants while using instant messaging.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Disturbing situations of the users in the group are violations of privacy, harassment, hurtful words and behaviors, and gender discrimination.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:To take precautions against these actions, it has been revealed that training on the use of instant messaging applications and social media should be disseminated, awareness-raising activities should be organized and reactions should be taken to establish the right communication.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:anlık mesajlaşma uygulamaları · sosyal kimlik teorisi · sosyal normlar

Abstract

The study aims to examine the disturbing situations, and the emotions and thoughts of the participants while using instant messaging. Disturbing situations of the users in the group are violations of privacy, harassment, hurtful words and behaviors, and gender discrimination. The main reasons why users accept these situations are primarily various fears; another is the cultural structure they are in and the personal characteristics of the users. To take precautions against these actions, it has been revealed that training on the use of instant messaging applications and social media should be disseminated, awareness-raising activities should be organized and reactions should be taken to establish the right communication.

Özet

Çalışma, rahatsız anlık mesajlaşma gruplarındaki katılımcıların yaşadıkları rahatsız edici durumlara karşı duygu ve düşüncelerini incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Gruptaki kullanıcıları rahatsız eden durumların, gizlilik ihlalleri, taciz, incitici söz ve davranışlar ve cinsiyet ayrımcılığı olduğu görülmüştür. Kullanıcıların bu durumları kabul etmelerinin temel nedenleri öncelikle çeşitli korkulardır; diğeri ise içinde bulundukları kültürel yapı ve kullanıcıların kişisel özellikleridir. Bu eylemlere karşı önlem almak için anlık mesajlaşma uygulamalarının ve sosyal medyanın kullanımına yönelik eğitimlerin yaygınlaştırılması, farkındalık artırıcı faaliyetler düzenlenmesi ve doğru iletişimin kurulması gereken tepkinin gösterilmesi gerektiği ortaya çıkmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAKAY, M. E., ÜNAL, S., ARSLAN, A. (2023). INSTANT MESSAGING GROUPS: IS IT CONVENIENCE OR TORTURE?. Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2, 995–1019. https://ajindex.com/articles/966531

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. KAYNAKÇA 1.Chung, D. S., & Nam, C. S. (2007). An Analysis Of The Variables Predicting Instant Messenger Use. New Media & society, 9, 212-234. 2. Pimmer, C., Brühlmann, F., Odetola T. D., Dipeolu. O., Gröhbiel. U., & Ajuwon. A. J. (2018). Instant Messaging And Nursing Students’ Clinical Learning Experience. Nurse Education Today, 64, 119–124. 3. Ajzen, I. (2005).
  2. Atitudes, Personality and Behavior. Open University Press. 4. Sardana, D., Cavusgil, E., & Gupta, N. (2020). The Growing Popularity Of Spiritual Brands: What Drives Purchase İntent?. International Business Review, 30. 5. Martin. B., Wentzel. D., & Tomczak. T. (2008). Effects Of Susceptibility To Normative Influence And Type Of Testimonial On Attitudes Toward Print Advertising. Journal of Advertising, 37, 29-43. 6. Aronson, E. (1980). The Social Animal. Palgrave Macmillan. 7. Solomon, M. (2017). Consumer Behavior: Buying, Having, and Being 12th Edition. Hoboken: Pearson. 8. Tomasello, M. (2014). The Ultra-Social Animal. European Journal Of Social Psychology, 44,187-194. 9. McKeown, S., Haji, R., & Ferguson. N. (2016). Understanding Peace and Confl ict Through Social Identity. Springer International Publishing. 10. McLeod, S. (2021, July 30). Social Identity Theory. Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/social-identity-theory.html 11. Glass, R., & Li. S. (2010). Social Influence and Instant Messaging Adoption. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 51, 24-30. 12. Brown, R. (2000). Social Identity Theory: Past Achievements, Current Problems And Future challenges. Eur J Soc Psychol, 30,745-778. 13. Lin, C. W., Wang, K. Y., Chang, S. H., & Lin, J. A. (2017). Investigating The Development Of Brand Loyalty In Brand Communities From A Positive Psychology Perspective. Journal of Business Research, 99, 446-455. 14. Bagozzi, R. P., Dholakia, U.M., Pearo, L. R. K. (2007). Antecedents and Consequences of Online Social Interaction. Media Psychology, 9, 77-114. 15. Algesheimer, R., Dholakia, U.M., & Herrmann, A. (2005). The Social Influence of Brand Community: Evidence from European Car Clubs. Journal of Marketing, 69,19-34. 16. Shen, Y. C., Huang, C.Y., Chu, C. H., & Liao, H. C. (2010). Virtual Community Loyalty: An Interpersonal-Interaction Perspective. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 15(1), 49-74. 17. Lindiawati, Usman, I., & Astuti, S. W. (2019). Anticipating Normative Community Pressure İn Brand Community: A Study Of Young Entrepreneurs Community Of Bank Mandiri. Journal of Eco