Journals / Afet ve Risk Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 6 Sayı: 3

Flood Inundation Mapping for Porsuk Stream, Eskişehir, Turkey

Pages
759–775
Publication Date
2023-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Of the total flood area, 35% will be residential areas, 33% will be airports, 12% will be agricultural lands, 9% will be green areas, 7% will be industrial areas and 3% will be sports facilities.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Flood is one of the most widespread and catastrophic natural hazards for settlements in different parts of the world.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The results revealed that, according to the flood discharges in Porsuk Stream with probabilities of occurrence in every 50, 100, and 200 years, areas of 3.20 km2, 4.03 km2, and 4.48 km2 would be flooded, respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Of the total flood area, 35% will be residential areas, 33% will be airports, 12% will be agricultural lands, 9% will be green areas, 7% will be industrial areas and 3% will be sports facilities.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Flood inundation mapping · Porsuk Stream · HEC-RAS

Abstract

Flood is one of the most widespread and catastrophic natural hazards for settlements in different parts of the world. Eskişehir has faced numerous floods at varying scales, especially in the last century. Porsuk Stream moves in an artificial channel through the Eskişehir city center. The bed of Porsuk Stream is expanded and cascaded at the entrance to the city center, and the stream has been turned into one of the attractions of the city by increasing its water level with nine regulators. Expanding the river bed is a frequently used method to reduce flood risk. However, in Eskisehir, the fact that the river bed is kept largely filled with water is a major source of risk in case of flooding. The study is based on a scenario in which flooding occurs due to the failure of regulator covers to open. In the study field, the sensitivity of the numerical field model that was created along the stream bed was further improved by measuring lengths and depths throughout the channel. Within the framework of the scenario, the water levels that can change with flood discharges were determined, and inundation areas were calculated. The results revealed that, according to the flood discharges in Porsuk Stream with probabilities of occurrence in every 50, 100, and 200 years, areas of 3.20 km2, 4.03 km2, and 4.48 km2 would be flooded, respectively. The maximum discharge with a return period of 200 years (Q200) is 194.46 m3/s, which, if realized, would result in inundation of 1.58 km2 of residential areas and 0.55 km2 of agricultural land. Of the total flood area, 35% will be residential areas, 33% will be airports, 12% will be agricultural lands, 9% will be green areas, 7% will be industrial areas and 3% will be sports facilities.

Özet

Flood is one of the most widespread and catastrophic natural hazards for settlements in different parts of the world. Eskişehir has faced numerous floods at varying scales, especially in the last century. Porsuk Stream moves in an artificial channel through the Eskişehir city center. The bed of Porsuk Stream is expanded and cascaded at the entrance to the city center, and the stream has been turned into one of the attractions of the city by increasing its water level with nine regulators. Expanding the river bed is a frequently used method to reduce flood risk. However, in Eskisehir, the fact that the river bed is kept largely filled with water is a major source of risk in case of flooding. The study is based on a scenario in which flooding occurs due to the failure of regulator covers to open. In the study field, the sensitivity of the numerical field model that was created along the stream bed was further improved by measuring lengths and depths throughout the channel. Within the framework of the scenario, the water levels that can change with flood discharges were determined, and inundation areas were calculated. The results revealed that, according to the flood discharges in Porsuk Stream with probabilities of occurrence in every 50, 100, and 200 years, areas of 3.20 km2, 4.03 km2, and 4.48 km2 would be flooded, respectively. The maximum discharge with a return period of 200 years (Q200) is 194.46 m3/s, which, if realized, would result in inundation of 1.58 km2 of residential areas and 0.55 km2 of agricultural land. Of the total flood area, 35% will be residential areas, 33% will be airports, 12% will be agricultural lands, 9% will be green areas, 7% will be industrial areas and 3% will be sports facilities.

🔖

Cite This Article

KALE, M. M., ATAOL, M. (2023). Flood Inundation Mapping for Porsuk Stream, Eskişehir, Turkey. Afet ve Risk Dergisi, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 3, 759–775. https://ajindex.com/articles/965835

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Ahad, U., Ali, U., Inayatullah, M., Rauf Shah, A., (2022). Flood Frequency Analysis: A Case Study of Pohru River Catchment, Kashmir Himalayas, India. Journal of the Geological Society of India, 98(12), 1754-1760
  2. Alfieri L., Salamon P., Bianchi A., Neal J., Bates P., Feyen L., (2014) Advances in pan-European flood hazard mapping. Hydrol Process 28(13):4067–4077. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9947
  3. Amellah O., El Morabiti K., Ouchar Al-djazouli M., (2020) Spatialization and assessment of flood hazard using 1D numerical simulation in the plain of Oued Laou (North Morocco). Arab J Geosci (13) 635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-05592-4
  4. Ashley R.M., Balmforth D.J., Saul A.J., Blanskby J.D., (2005) Flooding in the future - predicting climate change. risks and responses in urban areas. Water Sci Technol. 52(5): 265-273. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2005.0142 Baker V.R., (2013) Global late Quaternary fluvial paleohydrology with special emphasis on paleofloods and megafloods, in: Fluvial Geomorphology, edited by: Wohl, EE, Vol. 9, Treatise on Geomorphology, Academic Press, San Diego, 511–527
  5. Bayazıt Y., Bakiş R., Koç C., Kaya T., Özdemir N., (2019) Formation of Eskişehir Province Flood Maps with Using of Geographical Information Systems. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection. 7(11). 151. https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2019.711011
  6. Bedient P.B., Huber W.C., (2002) Hydrology and Floodplain Analysis. Prentice Hall. USA. Berghuijs W.R., Allen S.T., Harrigan S., Kirchner J.W., (2019) Growing spatial scales of synchronous river flooding in Europe. Geophysical Research Letters, 46(3), 1423-1428. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL081883 Berz G., (2001) Flood disasters: lessons from the past-worries for the future. Proceedings of The Institution of Civil Engineers-Water Maritime and Energy. 148(1). 57-58. https://doi.org/10.1680/wame.2000.142.1.3
  7. Bharath R., Elshorbagy A., (2018) Flood mapping under uncertainty: a case study in the Canadian prair. Natural Hazards 94: 537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3401-1
  8. Chang H., Franczyk J., (2008)
  9. Climate Change, Land Use Change, and Floods: Toward an Integrated Assessment. Geography Compass. 2(5). 1549-1579. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00136.x
  10. Chen J., Hill A.A., Urbano L.D., (2009) A GIS-based model for urban flood inundation. J Hydrol 373(1):184–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.04.021
  11. Costabile, P., Costanzo, C., Ferraro, D., Macchione, F., Petaccia, G., (2020) Performances of the new HEC-RAS versio