Journals / Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 14 Sayı: 3

Investigation of The Measurement Invariance of Affective Characteristics Related to TIMSS 2019 Mathematics Achievement by Gender

Pages
185–199
Publication Date
2023-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was concluded that there was no gender bias in the three scales for which MG-CFA was performed, and the mean scores were comparable according to gender.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This research examines whether the affective characteristics of the TIMSS 2019 Turkey mathematics application provide measurement invariance according to gender.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The research sample consists of 4048 8th-grade students participating in the TIMSS in 2019.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was concluded that there was no gender bias in the three scales for which MG-CFA was performed, and the mean scores were comparable according to gender.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:TIMSS · Affective variables · Measurement invariance

Abstract

This research examines whether the affective characteristics of the TIMSS 2019 Turkey mathematics application provide measurement invariance according to gender. The research sample consists of 4048 8th-grade students participating in the TIMSS in 2019. Research data were downloaded from the international website of TIMSS. The research data collection tools are “Sense of School Belonging”, “Students Confident in Mathematics”, “Students Like Learning Mathematics”, and “Students Value Mathematics” scales. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) were performed in the context of validity analyses to examine measurement invariance. In terms of reliability, the Cronbach Alfa internal consistency coefficient was calculated. Accordingly, out of the four scales in the study, only “Students Confident in Mathematics” scale could not be confirmed in confirmatory factor analysis. Therefore, while “Students Confident in Mathematics” scale was not examined for measurement invariance, the other three scales were examined within the scope of measurement invariance. For measurement invariance, research data were tested with Multiple Group Confirmatory Factor Analysis (MG-CFA), one of the Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) techniques. As a result of the analyses, while the strict invariance model was provided in “Students Like Learning Mathematics” scale and “Students Value Mathematics” scale, strong invariance/scale invariance model was provided in “Sense of School Belonging” scale. It was concluded that there was no gender bias in the three scales for which MG-CFA was performed, and the mean scores were comparable according to gender. In this context, it can be said that “Sense of School Belonging”, “Students Like Learning Mathematics”, and “Students Value Mathematics” scales are valid in determining the differences according to gender.

🔖

Cite This Article

ATILGAN, M., DENİZ, K. Z. (2023). Investigation of The Measurement Invariance of Affective Characteristics Related to TIMSS 2019 Mathematics Achievement by Gender. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 3, 185–199. https://ajindex.com/articles/965334

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Akyüz-Aru, S. (2020). 4. sınıf öğrencilerinin fen ve matematik başarısına etki eden değişkenlerin incelenmesi “TIMSS 2015 durum analizi” [Investigation of variables affecting science and mathematics success of grade 4 students "TIMSS 2015 status analysis"] [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Gazi Üniversitesi. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
  2. Akyüz, G., & Pala, N. M. (2010). PISA 2003 sonuçlarına göre öğrenci ve sınıf özelliklerinin matematik okuryazarlığına ve problem çözme becerilerine etkisi [The effect of student and class characteristics on mathematics literacy and problem solving in PISA 2003]. İlköğretim Online, 9(2), 668-678.
  3. Akyüz, G., & Satıcı, K. (2013). PISA 2003 verilerine göre matematik okuryazarlığının çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi: Türkiye ve Hong Kong-Çin modelleri [Investigation of the factors affecting mathematics literacy using PISA 2003 results: Turkey and Hong Kong-China]. Kastamonu Üniversitesi Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 21(2), 503 - 522. Atar, B. (2011). Tanımlayıcı ve Açıklayıcı Madde Tepki Modellerinin TIMSS 2007 Türkiye Matematik Verisine Uyarlanması [An application of descriptive and explanatory ıtem response models to TIMSS 2007 Turkey mathematics data]. Eğitim ve Bilim, 36(159), 255 - 269. Aydın, M. (2015). Öğrenci ve okul kaynaklı faktörlerin TIMSS matematik başarısına etkisi [The effects of student-level and school-level factors on middle school students' mathematics achievement] [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
  4. Başusta, N. B., & Gelbal, S. (2015). Gruplar arası karşılaştırmalarda ölçme değişmezliğinin test edilmesi: PISA öğrenci anketi örneği [Examination of Measurement Invariance at Groups’ Comparisons: A Study on PISA Student Questionnaire]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 30(4), 80-90.
  5. Bloom, B. S. (2012). İnsan nitelikleri ve okulda öğrenme [Human characteristics and school learning] (D. A. Özçelik, Trans.). Pegem Akademi. Bofah, E.At., & Hannula, M.S. (2015). TIMSS data in an African comparative perspective: Investigating the factors influencing achievement in mathematics and their psychometric properties. Large-scale Assessments in Education, 3(4), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-015-0014-y
  6. Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, application and programming. Lawrence Erlbaum. Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthén, B. (1989). Testing for the