Journals / Fırat Tıp Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1

IVF Ön hazırlığı yapılan hastalardaki diagnostik histeroskopi sonuçlarımız

Our office-based diagnostic hysteroscopy results of pre-IVF patients

Pages
7–10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: To improve the outcome of ART cycles, OH could be performed as a routine procedure for the patients who will experience IVF treatment.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To evaluate the intrauterine pathologies using office-based hysteroscopy (OH) in patients scheduled for assisted reproductive technologies (ART).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: This study was conducted at the In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Unit of Firat University Hospital, between March 2010- January 2012.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: To improve the outcome of ART cycles, OH could be performed as a routine procedure for the patients who will experience IVF treatment.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the intrauterine pathologies using office-based hysteroscopy (OH) in patients scheduled for assisted reproductive technologies (ART). Materials and Methods: This study was conducted at the In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Unit of Firat University Hospital, between March 2010- January 2012. The 219 patients with no OH within the previous 6 months were enrolled the study with rigid hysteroscope (continous flow; 30-degree forward-oblique view) assembled in a 4-mm diameter diagnostic sheath with an atraumatic tip. After OH investigation, endometrial sampling was performed with biopsy catheter. The patients in whom the findings were normal proceeded to an IVF cycle within 1 month. Results: The procedure was succesful in 219 patients, with mean (±SD) age of 31.9 (±5.2) years, duration of infertility of 6.2 (±4.5) years and number of previous ART trials 1.6 (±1.1). The type of infertility were as follows: 150 primary (68.5%) and 69 secondary infertility (31.5%). Endometrial polyp and uterine subseptum were the major intracavitary abnormalities. Chronic endometritis and endometrial polyp were the major histopathologic abnormalities. Chronic endometritis, uterine subseptum and endometrial hyperplasia were higher in patients &#8805;35 years (p<0.01). There was a decrease in the pregnancy rate (40% vs 46%), implantation rate (51% vs 56%) and fertilization rate (69% vs 74%) in the patients with hysteroscopic abnorma- lity compared to patients without abnormality respectively. Conclusion: To improve the outcome of ART cycles, OH could be performed as a routine procedure for the patients who will experience IVF treatment.

Özet

Amaç: Çalışmamızda invitro fertilizasyon (IVF) tedavisi programına alınmış hastalarda ofis histeroskopi (OH) ile saptanacak intrauterin patolojileri ortaya çıkarmayı amaçladık. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu retrospektif çalışmaya Fırat Üniversitesi Hastanesi IVF Ünitesi’nde Mart 2010- Ocak 2012 tarihleri arasında tüp bebek prog- ramına alınan ve OH yapılan 219 hasta dahil edildi. Rijid, 30 derece ileri oblik görüşlü-sürekli akımlı, 4mm çaplı, diagnostik histeroskop son 6 ayda ve daha önce OH yapılmamış hastalara uygulandı. OH takiben biyopsi kateteri ile endometrial örnekleme yapıldı. Bulguları normal olan hastalar takip eden 1 ay içinde IVF siklusuna alındı. Bulgular: Hastaların ortalama yaşı 31.9 (±5.2) yıl, infertilite süresi 6.2 (±4.5) yıl ve daha önceki IVF deneme sayısı 1.6 (±1.1) adet idi. Hastaların %68.5’i primer infertil, %31.5’i sekonder infertil idi. İntrakaviter major anomaliler uterin subseptum ve endometrial polip idi. Histopatolojik major bulgular kronik endometrit ve endometrial hiperplazi idi. Kronik endometrit, uterin subseptum ve endometrial hiperplazi patolojileri 35 yaş üstü hastalarda daha fazla idi (p<0.01). Histeroskopik patoloji saptanan hastalarda gebelik oranı (%40 vs %46), implantasyon oranı (%51 vs %56) ve fertilizasyon oranı (%69 vs %74) histeroskopik patoloji saptanmayanlara göre daha düşük gözlendi. Sonuç: IVF siklusuna alınacak hastalarda tedavi başarısını artırabilmek için OH rutin bir prosedür olarak uygulanabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZKAN, Z. S., KUMBAK, B., ATILGAN, R., ŞİMŞEK, M., SAPMAZ, E. (2013). IVF Ön hazırlığı yapılan hastalardaki diagnostik histeroskopi sonuçlarımız. Fırat Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1, 7–10. https://ajindex.com/articles/164661

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Grønlund L, Hertz J, Helm P, Colov NP. Transvaginal so- nohysterography and hysteroscopy in the evaluation of female infertility, habitual abortion or metrorrhagia. A comparative study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999; 78: 415-8.
  2. Granberg S, Wikland M, Karlsson B, Norstrom A, Friberg LG. Endometrial thickness as measured by endovaginal ultraso- nography for identifying endometrial abnormalities. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 164: 47–52.
  3. Parsons AK, Lense JJ. Sonohysterography for endometrial abnormalities: Preliminary results. J Clin Ultrasound 1993; 21: 87–95.
  4. Ayida G, Chamberlain P, Barlow D, Kennedy S. Uterine cavity assesment prior to in vitro fertilization: comparison of transvaginal scanning, saline contrast hysterosonography and hysteroscopy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997; 10: 59–62.
  5. Eldar-Geva T, Meagher S, Healy DL, MacLachlan V, Breheny S, Wood C. Effect of intramural, subserosal, and submucosal uterine fibroids on the outcome of assisted reproductive tech- nology treatment. Fertil Steril 1998; 70: 687–91. Healy DL. Impact of uterine fibroids on ARToutcome. Envi- ron Health Perspect 2000; 108: 845–7. ES. Impact of intramural leiomyomata on in-vitro fertilization embryo transfer cycle outcome. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2003; 15: 239-42.
  6. Perez-Medina T, Bajo-Arenas J, Salazar F et al. Endometrial polyps and their implication in the pregnancy rates of patients undergoing intrauterine insemination: a prospective, randomi- zed study. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 1632–5.
  7. Pabuccu R, Gomel V. Reproductive outcome after hysterosco- pic metroplasty in women with septate uterus and otherwise unexplained infertility. Fertil Steril 2004; 81: 1675–8.
  8. Hollett-Caines J, Vilos GA, Abu-Rafea B, Ahmad R. Fertility and pregnancy outcomes following hysteroscopic septum divi- sion. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2006; 28: 156–9.
  9. Dicker D, Ashkenazi J, Feldberg D, Farhi J, Shalev J, Ben- Rafael Z. The value of repeat hysteroscopic evaluation in patients with failed in vitro fertilization transfer cycles. Fertil Steril 1992; 58: 833–5.
  10. Dueholm M, Lundorf E, Hansen ES, Ledertoug S, Olesen F. Evaluation of the uterine cavity with magnetic resonance imaging, transvaginal sonography, hysterosonographic examination, and diagnostic hysteroscopy. Fertil Steril 2001; 76: 350– 7. De Angelis C, Santoro G, Re ME, Nofroni I. Office hysteros- copy and compliance: mini-hysteroscopy versus traditional hysteroscopy in a randomized trial. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 2441–5.
  11. Hinckley MD, Milki AA. 1000 office-based