SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kartal Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 2

Comparison of cleavage stage versus blastocyst embryo transfer with regard to ovarian reserve

Klivaj evresi ve blastokist embriyo transferlerinin over rezervine göre karşılaştırılması

Ekrem SAPMAZ
Hüseyin TİMURKAN
Mustafa EKİNCİ
Zehra Sema ÖZKAN
Pages
138–142
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: The 78 women were divided into two groups as follows: poor responders (NRO

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: To compare the pregnancy rates of patients experiencing cleavage stage versus blastocyst single embryo transfer (ET) with regard to ovarian reserve.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: This study was conducted with analysis of 200 ICSI- ET cycles performed in our IVF Center.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: The 78 women were divided into two groups as follows: poor responders (NRO
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background: To compare the pregnancy rates of patients experiencing cleavage stage versus blastocyst single embryo transfer (ET) with regard to ovarian reserve. Methods: This study was conducted with analysis of 200 ICSI- ET cycles performed in our IVF Center. A total of 78 ICSI- ET cycles down-regulated with GnRH antagonists were included in the study and the etiology of infertility was as follows: tubal factor (n=8), decreased ovarian reserve (n=29), and unexplained infertility (n=41). The population was divided into two groups according to the number of retrieved oocytes (NRO). The groups were compared for the parameters of ET day, embryo quality, grade1 embryo rate, pregnancy rate and implantation rate. Results: The 78 women were divided into two groups as follows: poor responders (NRO

Özet

Amaç: İntrasitoplazmik sperm injeksiyonu (ICSI) siklusuna alınan hastaların over rezervlerine göre klivaj evresi ile blastokist tek embriyo transferi (ET) sonrası gebelik oranları arasında fark olup olmadığını araştırmak. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışmada hastanemiz Tüp Bebek Merkezinde ICSI-ET siklusuna alınan 200 çiftin tedavi sonuçları incelendi. Tubal faktör, azalmış over rezervi ve açıklanamayan kısırlık tanısı konan, GnRH antagonisti ile hipofizer down-regülasyonu yapılan toplam 78 çift toplanan oosit sayısına (TOS) göre azalmış ve normal over rezervli şeklinde iki gruba ayrıldı. Bu gruplar ET günü, ET günü grade 1 embriyo oranı, implantasyon ve gebelik oranları açısından kıyaslandı. Bulgular: Açıklanamayan kısırlık (n=41), azalmış over rezervi (n=29) ve tubal faktör (n=8) tanılı 78 hastanın ortalama yaş, beden kitle indeksi (BKİ), menstrual siklusun üçüncü günü FSH ve estradiol seviyeleri sırasıyla 31.5±5.2 yıl, 24.9±5.3 kg/ m2, 6.9±3.4 IU/mL ve 40.4±16.6 pg/mL idi. TOS

🔖

Cite This Article

SAPMAZ, E., TİMURKAN, H., EKİNCİ, M., ÖZKAN, Z. S. (2022). Comparison of cleavage stage versus blastocyst embryo transfer with regard to ovarian reserve. Kartal Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 2, 138–142. https://ajindex.com/articles/571361

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Loutradis D, Elsheikh A, Kallianidis K, Drakakis P, Stefanidis K, Milingos S, et al. Results of controlled ovarian stimulation for ART in poor responders according to the short protocol using different gonadotrophins combi- nations. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2004
  2. 270(4):223-6. 2.Jonsdottir I, Lundin K, Bergh C. Double embryo transfer gives good pregnancy and live birth rates in poor responders with a modest increase in multiple birth rates: results from an observational study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2011
  3. 90(7):761-6. 3.Keay SD, Liversedge NH, Mathur RS, Jenkins JM. Assisted conception following poor ovarian response to gonadotrophin stimulation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997
  4. 104(5):521-7. 4.Ulug U, Ben-Shlomo I, Turan E, Erden HF, Akman MA, Bahceci M. Conception rates following assisted reproduction in poor responder patients: a retrospective study in 300 consecutive cycles. Reprod Biomed Online 2003
  5. 6(4):439-43. 5.Straughen JK, Salihu HM, Keith L, Petrozzino J, Jones C. Obligatory versus elective single embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization. A population-based analysis of data from the U.K. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. J Reprod Med 2013
  6. 58(3-4):95-100. 6. Tong GQ, Cao SR, Wu X, Zhang JQ, Cui J, Heng BC, et al. Clinical outcome of fresh and vitrified-warmed blastocyst and cleavage-stage embryo transfers in ethnic Chi- nese ART patients. J Ovarian Res 2012
  7. 5(1):27. 7.Glujovsky D, Blake D, Farquhar C, Bardach A. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012
  8. CD002118. 8.Conaghan J, Chen AA, Willman SP, Ivani K, Chenette PE, Boostanfar R, et al. Improving embryo selection using a computer-automated time-lapse image analysis test plus day 3 morphology: results from a prospective multicenter trial. Fertil Steril 2013
  9. 100(2):412-9.e5. 9. Blake D, Proctor M, Johnson N, Olive D. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted conception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005
  10. :CD002118. 10. Guerif F, Frapsauce C, Chavez C, Cadoret V, Royere D. Treating women under 36 years old without top-quality embryos on day 2: a prospective study comparing double embryo transfer with single blastocyst transfer. Hum Reprod 2011
  11. 26(4):775-81. 11. Blake DA, Farquhar CM, Johnson N, Proctor M. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted conception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007
  12. :CD002118. 12. Zander-Fox DL, Tremellen K, Lane M. Single blastocyst