Journals / Journal of Contemporary Medicine / 2023 / Cilt: 13 Sayı: 5

Assessment of DNA Damage Induced by Velum® Prime in Human Lymphocytes

Velum® Prime Kaynaklı DNA Hasarının İnsan Lenfositlerinde Değerlendirilmesi

Pages
824–829
Publication Date
2023-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusions: The results suggest that fluopyram causes an increase in DNA damage in a dose- and time-dependent manner.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Fluopyram is a mitochondrial complex II inhibitor with low water solubility and a relatively long half-life in soil.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Lymphocytes of eight volunteers were isolated using histopaque-1077.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusions: The results suggest that fluopyram causes an increase in DNA damage in a dose- and time-dependent manner.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Comet metodu · Fluopyram · Genotoksisite

Abstract

Aim: Fluopyram is a mitochondrial complex II inhibitor with low water solubility and a relatively long half-life in soil. So it may also be dangerous for humans. The effect of fluopyram on DNA damage was evaluated in human lymphocytes using the comet assay. Materials and Methods: Lymphocytes of eight volunteers were isolated using histopaque-1077. Fluopyram was administered at doses of 0.05, 0.25, and 1.00 mg/mL for 1, 2, and 4 h. The comet assay was applied, and photographs of the slides were taken under a fluorescence microscope. 50 cells per slide were analyzed using the OpenComet software. The obtained results were statistically evaluated using one-way ANOVA. Results: Fluopyram treatments at 1.00 mg/mL for 1 h and 0.05, 0.25, and 1.00 mg/mL for 2 and 4 h resulted in a statistically significant increase in DNA damage compared to the internal control groups (p<0.05). When comparing groups with the same treatment time but different doses, the increase in DNA damage observed after a 1-h treatment of 1.00 mg/mL fluopyram was higher than the increase observed after a 1-h treatment of 0.05 mg/mL fluopyram (p<0.05). When comparing groups with different treatment times but the same dose, the increase in DNA damage after a 4-h treatment of 0.25 mg/mL fluopyram was higher than the increase observed after a 1-h treatment of 0.25 mg/mL fluopyram (p<0.05). Conclusions: The results suggest that fluopyram causes an increase in DNA damage in a dose- and time-dependent manner. It is essential to investigate these findings in vivo as well.

Özet

Amaç: Fluopyram mitokondriyal kompleks II inhibitörü, suda çözünürlüğü düşük ve topraktaki yarılanma ömrü oldukça uzun bir pestisittir. Dolayısı ile insanlara ulaşması oldukça muhtemeldir. DNA hasarı üzerindeki etkisi insan lenfosit hücrelerinde comet metodu ile değerlendirilmiştir. Gereç ve Yöntem: 8 gönüllüden histopak-1077 kullanılarak lenfositler elde edilmiştir. 0.05, 0.25 ve 1.00 mg/mL olmak üzere 3 dozda ve 1, 2 ve 4 saat fluopyram uygulaması yapılmıştır. Comet metodu uygulanmış ve hazırlanan preperatların floresan mikroskop altında fotoğrafları çekilmiştir. Preperat başına 50 hücre OpenComet programı ile değerlendirilmiş ve sonuçlar tek yönlü anova ile istatistiksel olarak değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular: 1.00 mg/mL 1 saat ve 0.05, 0.25, 1.00 mg/mL 2 ve 4 saat fluopyram uygulamaları internal kontrol gruplarına kıyasla DNA hasarında istatiksel olarak anlamlı artışa sebep olmuştur (p<0.05). Aynı uygulama süresine ve farklı doza sahip gruplar kendi arasında karşılaştırıldığında, 1 saat 1.00 mg/mL fluopyram uygulaması sonucunda DNA hasarında meydana gelen artış, 1 saat 0.05 mg/mL fluopyram uygulaması sonucunda meydana gelen artıştan daha yüksektir (p<0.05). Farklı uygulama süresine ve aynı doza sahip gruplar kendi arasında karşılaştırıldığında 4 saat 0.25 mg/mL fluopyram uygulaması sonucunda DNA hasarında meydana gelen artış, 1 saat 0.25 mg/mL fluopyram uygulaması sonucunda meydana gelen artıştan daha yüksektir (p<0.05). Sonuç: Bu sonuçlara göre fluopyramın doz ve zaman bağımlı şekilde DNA hasarında artışa sebep olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Sonuçların in vivo olarak da araştırılması gerekmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOĞAY, V. A., ÇELİK, D. A. (2023). Assessment of DNA Damage Induced by Velum® Prime in Human Lymphocytes. Journal of Contemporary Medicine, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 5, 824–829. https://ajindex.com/articles/964420

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Jackson SP, Bartek J. The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease. Nature. 2009;461(7267):1071-8
  2. Elmore S. Apoptosis: A review of programmed cell death. Toxicol Pathol. 2007;35(4):495-516
  3. Hakem R. DNA-damage repair; the good, the bad, and the ugly. EMBO J. 2008;27(4):589-605
  4. Celik DA, Togay VA, Turel GY, Tuluceoglu EE, Kosar PA. DNA Damages of Widely Used Pesticides; A Comet Assay Report for Chlorothalonil and Glyphosate Potassium Salt. Fresenius Environ Bull. 2021;30(4 A):4170-6
  5. Toğay VA, Yavuz Türel G, Aşcı Çelik D, Özgöçmen M, Evgen Tülüceoğlu E, Şen İ, et al. DNA damage effect of cyprodinil and thiacloprid in adult zebrafish gills. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2021;28(12):14482-7
  6. Yavuz Türel G, Toğay VA, Aşcı Çelik D. Genotoxicity of thiacloprid in zebrafish liver. Arch Environ Occup Health. 2022:78(3):152-157 7. Çelik DA, Toğay VA. Rotenon’un İnsan Lenfositlerinde İn Vitro Genotoksisitesi. J Healt Sci SDU. 2022;13(3):448-55
  7. Toğay VA, Çelik DA. Thiacloprid'in İnsan Lenfositlerinde DNA Hasarına Etkisi. Med J SDU. 2022;29(4):597-602
  8. Sanborn M, Kerr KJ, Sanin LH, Cole DC, Bassil KL, Vakil C. Non-cancer health effects of pesticides: systematic review and implications for family doctors. Can Fam Physician. 2007;53(10):1712-20
  9. Toğay VA. Pestisit Thiacloprid'in Parkinson Hastalığı ile Bağlantısının Araştırılması [DoktoraTezi]. Isparta: Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi; 2021
  10. Qian L, Cui F, Yang Y, Liu Y, Qi S, Wang C. Mechanisms of developmental toxicity in zebrafish embryos (Danio rerio) induced by boscalid. Sci Total Environ. 2018;634:478-87
  11. Tinwell H, Rouquie D, Schorsch F, Geter D, Wason S, Bars R. Liver tumor formation in female rat induced by fluopyram is mediated by CAR/PXR nuclear receptor activation. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2014;70(3):648-58
  12. Li CJ, Yuan SF, Jiang F, Xie YF, Guo YH, Yu H, et al. Degradation of fluopyram in water under ozone enhanced microbubbles: Kinetics, degradation products, reaction mechanism, and toxicity evaluation. Chemosphere. 2020;258
  13. Wu LT, Liu JN, Wang K, Pan S, Qi ZQ. Baseline sensitivity and resistance analysis of fluopyram against Botrytis cinerea from tomato in Liaoning Province, China. J of Phytopathol. 2023
  14. Schleker ASS, Rist M, Matera C, Damijonaitis A, Collienne U, Matsuoka K, et al. Mode of action of fluopyram in plant-parasitic nematodes. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):11954
  15. Stucky T, Dahlin P. Fluopyram: Optimal Application Time Point and Planting Hole Treat