SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering / 2023 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 3

Analysis of Factors Affecting Common Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence-Based Tools by Machine Learning Methods

Yasin KIRELLİ
Pages
233–237
Publication Date
2023-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Identifying what type of category is needed for AI tools and method selection are interlinked, and the research provides an overview of this connection.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Artificial Intelligence is a sub-branch of artificial intelligence used to produce new data or content.
📊
Key Findings & Data:These methods can create recent examples in different categorical fields such as natural language processing, image processing, music, and video creation by using models from learning clusters with artificial intelligence (AI) tools in this field.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Identifying what type of category is needed for AI tools and method selection are interlinked, and the research provides an overview of this connection.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:AI Tools · Generative Artificial Intelligence · Machine Learning

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence is a sub-branch of artificial intelligence used to produce new data or content. These methods can create recent examples in different categorical fields such as natural language processing, image processing, music, and video creation by using models from learning clusters with artificial intelligence (AI) tools in this field. AI tools that can solve real-world problems are also created using different methods apart from generative AI methods. With generative-based artificial intelligence tools, it can facilitate people's work in jobs that require creativity. However, they can offer the opportunity to build advanced models that learn from data with other artificial intelligence methods. In the study, the public dataset has been used. This dataset includes trending artificial intelligence tools, AI methods, and user scores. In this study the working area and user trend of the ai tools in the dataset and the effect of generative AI methods on the development of the tool are discussed. Random Forest and Naive Bayes algorithms from classification methods have been used to measure the impact and estimation. Several AI tools help solve real-life problems. Identifying what type of category is needed for AI tools and method selection are interlinked, and the research provides an overview of this connection.

🔖

Cite This Article

KIRELLİ, Y. (2023). Analysis of Factors Affecting Common Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence-Based Tools by Machine Learning Methods. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 3, 233–237. https://ajindex.com/articles/964273

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. A. Holzinger, K. Keiblinger, P. Holub, K. Zatloukal, and H. Müller, (2023). AI for life: Trends in artificial intelligence for biotechnology,” N Biotechnol, 74;16–24 doi: 10.1016/j.nbt.2023.02.001
  2. N. Eslamirad, F. De Luca, K. Sakari Lylykangas, and S. Ben Yahia, (2023). Data generative machine learning model for the assessment of outdoor thermal and wind comfort in a northern urban environment, Frontiers of Architectural Research, doi: 10.1016/j.foar.2022.12.001
  3. V. Couteaux et al., (2023). Synthetic MR image generation of macrotrabecular-massive hepatocellular carcinoma using generative adversarial networks, Diagn Interv Imaging, doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2023.01.003
  4. H. Woldesellasse and S. Tesfamariam, (2022). Data Augmentation Using conditional Generative Adversarial Network (cGAN): Application for Prediction of Corrosion Pit Depth and Testing Using Neural Network, Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering, p. 100091 doi: 10.1016/j.jpse.2022.100091
  5. S. O’Connor and ChatGPT, (2023). Open artificial intelligence platforms in nursing education: Tools for academic progress or abuse?, Nurse Education in Practice, vol
  6. Elsevier Ltd, doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103537
  7. T. Ching et al., (2018). Opportunities and obstacles for deep learning in biology and medicine,” J R Soc Interface, 15;141 doi: 10.1098/RSIF.2017.0387
  8. D. Dana et al., (2018). Deep Learning in Drug Discovery and Medicine; Scratching the Surface, Molecules, 23;9 doi: 10.3390/molecules23092384
  9. E. Lin, P. H. Kuo, Y. L. Liu, Y. W. Y. Yu, A. C. Yang, and S. J. Tsai, (2018). A Deep Learning Approach for Predicting Antidepressant Response in Major Depression Using Clinical and Genetic Biomarkers. Front Psychiatry, 9 doi: 10.3389/FPSYT.2018.00290
  10. Y. Chauvin and D. E. Rumelhart, Backpropagation: theory, architectures, and applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1995. Accessed: Mar. 13, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.routledge.com/Backpropagation-Theory-Architectures-and-Applications/Chauvin-Rumelhart/p/book/9780805812596 [10]H. Zhao, H. Li, S. Maurer-Stroh, and L. Cheng, (2018). Synthesizing retinal and neuronal images with generative adversarial nets. Med Image Anal, 49;14–26, doi: 10.1016/j.media.2018.07.001. [11]B. Hu, Y. Tang, E. I.-C. Chang, Y. Fan, M. Lai, and Y. Xu, (2017). Unsupervised Learning for Cell-level Visual Representation in Histopathology Images with Generative Adversarial Networks. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2018.2852639. [12]M. Mardani et al., (