SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering / 2023 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 4

OTA 2.0: An Advanced and Secure Blockchain Steganography Algorithm

Mustafa Takaoğlu(TÜBİTAK BİLGEM)0000-0002-1634-2705
Adem Özyavaş(İstanbul Atlas Üniversitesi)0000-0001-5375-1826
Naim Ajlouni(İstanbul Atlas Üniversitesi)0000-0002-5116-8933
Taner Dursun(TÜBİTAK BİLGEM UEKAE BZLAB)0000-0001-5893-8219
Faruk Takaoğlu(TÜBİTAK BİLGEM UEKAE)0000-0003-0828-2017
Selin Demir(TÜBİTAK BİLGEM UEKAE BZLAB)0009-0006-6331-6418
Pages
419–434
Publication Date
2023-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The broader integration of blockchain and steganography holds great promise for secure communication and data protection in the digital age.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Blockchain technology, a disruptive force beyond Bitcoin, is finding applications across various fields, including scientific disciplines like steganography – the art of data hiding.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Blockchain's integration into steganography has led to interesting developments, like the OTA (Ozyavas-Takaoglu-Ajlouni) algorithm introduced in 2021.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The broader integration of blockchain and steganography holds great promise for secure communication and data protection in the digital age.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2021 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Blockchain Technology · Digital Steganography · Blockchain Steganography

Abstract

Blockchain technology, a disruptive force beyond Bitcoin, is finding applications across various fields, including scientific disciplines like steganography – the art of data hiding. Digital steganography has gained momentum with data digitization, especially in multimedia environments like images, text, audio, and videos. Blockchain's integration into steganography has led to interesting developments, like the OTA (Ozyavas-Takaoglu-Ajlouni) algorithm introduced in 2021. The OTA algorithm consists of two stages: the OTA-steganography algorithm and the OTA-chain algorithm (private blockchain). Developed using Java and JavaScript, the OTA platform utilises OTA-coins as its native currency. Previous versions allowed various file types as cover-multimedia, with the secret message encrypted using the Vernam Cipher symmetric encryption and hidden using OTA steganography. Unlike other steganography methods, OTA doesn't alter the cover-multimedia but uses bit-level data marking. In the OTA system, the marked data indices are stored in 1 KB arrays and transmitted to the receiver as transactions via OTA-chain, each incurring a fixed fee of 1 OTA-coin to prevent DDoS attacks. The OTA 2.0 algorithm improved on the previous version by switching to Hyperledger Fabric protocol, which offers open-source, permissioned blockchain solutions, decentralisation capabilities, and self-sovereign identity support. The new version also enhanced block creation time to 2 seconds, increased block size to 90 MB, and employed a 4-bit marking pattern while eliminating transaction fees. Thanks to its innovative key-sharing method and permissioned architecture, OTA 2.0 proves resistant to steganalysis methods commonly used in steganography studies. This technology enables safe and swift embedding of secret messages in various multimedia files without detection. The broader integration of blockchain and steganography holds great promise for secure communication and data protection in the digital age.

🔖

Cite This Article

Takaoğlu, M., Özyavaş, A., Ajlouni, N., Dursun, T., Takaoğlu, F., Demir, S. (2023). OTA 2.0: An Advanced and Secure Blockchain Steganography Algorithm. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 4, 419–434. https://ajindex.com/articles/1494000

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (49)

  1. Takaoğlu, M., Özyavaş, A., Ajlouni, N. & Takaoğlu, F. (2023). Highly Secured Hybrid Image Steganography with an Improved Key Generation and Exchange for One-Time-Pad Encryption Method. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen Ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi. 23(1):101-114. DOI:10.35414/akufemubid.1128075
  2. Şahin, F., Çevik, T. & Takaoğlu, M. (2021). Review of the Literature on the Steganography Concept. International Journal of Computer Applications. 183(2):38-46. DOI:10.5120/ijca2021921298
  3. Takaoğlu, F. & Takaoğlu, M. (2020). Hiding Image and Text Data with DCT and DWT Techniques. Journal of İstanbul Aydın University. 12(3):189-200. DOI:10.17932/IAU.IAUD.2009.002/iaud_v12i3001
  4. Takaoğlu, F. & Takaoğlu, M. (2020). Today's Validity of Printer Steganography and Yellow Dot Analysis. e-Journal of New Media / Yeni Medya Elektronik Dergi-eJNM. 4(3):186-194. DOI:10.17932/IAU.EJNM.25480200.2020/ejnm_v4i3004
  5. Takaoğlu, M., Özer, Ç. & Parlak, E. (2019). Blockchain Technology and Possible Application Areas in Turkey. International Journal of Eastern Anatolia Science Engineering and Design. 1(2):260-295.
  6. Chaum, D. (1983). Blind signatures for untraceable payments. Advances in Cryptology Proceedings of Crypto. 82(3):199-203. DOI:10.1007/978-1-4757-0602-4_18
  7. Szabo, N. (2008). Bit Gold. http://unenumerated.blogspot.com/2005/12/bit-gold.html
  8. Fanning, S., Parker, S. & Contreras, H. S. (1999). Nabster. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napster_(streaming_service)
  9. Frankel, J. & Pepper, T. (2000). Gnutella. https://www.gnutellaforums.com/
  10. Cohen, B. (2001). BitTorrent. https://www.bittorrent.org/
  11. Back, A. (1997). Hashcash. http://www.hashcash.org/
  12. Dai, W. (1998). Bmoney. http://www.weidai.com/bmoney.txt
  13. Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
  14. Buterin, V. (2014). Ethereum. https://ethereum.org/en/whitepaper/
  15. Yakovenko, A. (2018). Solana: A new architecture for a high performance blockchain v0.8.13. https://solana.com/solana-whitepaper.pdf
  16. Kwon, J. (2014). Tendermint: Consensus without Mining. https://tendermint.com/static/docs/tendermint.pdf
  17. Sekniqi, K., Laine, D., Buttolph, S. & Sirer, E. G. (2020). Avalanche Platform. https://assets.website-files.com/5d80307810123f5ffbb34d6e/6008d7bbf8b10d1eb01e7e16_Avalanche%20Platform%20Whitepaper.pdf
  18. Ching, A. & Shaikh, M. (2022). The Aptos Blockchain: Safe, Scalable, and Upgradeable Web3 Infrastructure. https://aptos.dev/assets/files/Aptos-Whitepaper-47099b4b907b432f81fc0effd34f3b6a.pdf
  19. Chen, J. & Micali, S. (2017). Algorand Theoretical Paper. https://algorandcom.cdn.prismic.io/algorandcom%2Fece77f38-75b3-44de-bc7f-805f0e53a8d9_theoretical.pdf
  20. Takaoğlu, M., Özyavaş, A., Ajlouni, N., Alshahrani, A. & Alkasasbeh, B. (2021). A Novel and Robust Hybrid Blockchain and Steganography Scheme. Appl. Sci. 11:10698. DOI:10.3390/app112210698
  21. Takaoğlu, M., Takaoğlu, F. & Dursun, T. (2023, July 20-21). NBS: An NFT-Based Blockchain Steganography Method. Conference: the 2nd International Conference on Computing, IoT, and Data Analytics (ICCIDA), La Mancha-Spain. https://iccida.net/
  22. Chaudhary, A., Sharma, A. & Gupta, N. (2023). Designing A Secured Framework for the Steganography Process Using Blockchain and Machine Learning Technology. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 11(2s):96–103.
  23. Torki, O., Ashouri-Talouki, M. & Mahdavi, M. (2023). Hierarchical Deterministic Wallets for Secure Steganography in Blockchain. The ISC International Journal of Information Security. 15(1):73-81. DOI: 10.22042/isecure.2022.319074.729
  24. Chaudhary, A., Sharma, A. & Gupta, N. (2023). A Novel Approach to Blockchain and Deep Learning in the field of Steganography. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering. 11(2s):104–115.
  25. Jahnavi, S., Pradeep, S., Navtej, P., Medini, H.S. & Mamisha. (2023). Blockchain Technology Based Image Steganography. International Journal of Innovative Research in Technology. 9(12):637-642.
  26. Sarkar, P.; Ghosal, S.K.; Sarkar, M. (2020). Stego-Chain: A Framework to Mine Encoded Stego-Block in a Decentralized Network. J. King Saud Univ. Comput. Inf. Sci. 2020, 16, 25–29.
  27. Mohsin, A.H.; Zaidan, A.A.; Zaidan, B.B.; Mohammed, K.I.; Albahri, O.S.; Albahri, A.S.; Alsalem, M.A. (2021). PSO–Blockchain-Based Image Steganography: Towards a New Method to Secure Updating and Sharing COVID-19 Data in Decentralised Hospitals Intelligence Architecture. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2021, 80, 14137–14161.
  28. Li, D., & Kar, P. (2022). B-Spot: Blockchain and Steganography based Robust and Secure Photo Transmission Mechanism. Journal of Mobile Multimedia. 18(06):1677–1708. DOI:10.13052/jmm1550-4646.18610
  29. Basuki, A.I.; Rosiyadi, D. (2019). Joint Transaction-Image Steganography for High Capacity Covert Communication. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Computer, Control, Informatics and its Applications (IC3INA), Tangerang, Indonesia, 23–24 October 2019; pp. 41–46.
  30. Kandasamy, L. & Ajay, A. (2023). Implementation of Blockchain Technology for Secure Image Sharing Using Double Layer Steganography. In: Hu, Z., Wang, Y., He, M. (eds) Advances in Intelligent Systems, Computer Science and Digital Economics IV. CSDEIS 2022. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, vol 158. Springer, Cham. DOI:10.1007/978-3-031-24475-9_16
  31. Partala, J. (2018). Provably Secure Covert Communication on Blockchain. Cryptography. 2(3):18. DOI:10.3390/cryptography2030018
  32. Horng, J. H., Chang, C. C., Li, G. L., Lee,W. K. & Hwang, S.O. (2021). Blockchain-Based Reversible Data Hiding for Securing Medical Images. J. Healthc. Eng. DOI:10.1155/2021/9943402
  33. Xu, M., Wu, H., Geng, G., Zhang, X. & Ding, F. (2019). Broadcasting steganography in the blockchain. In International Workshop on Digital Watermarking; Springer: Berlin-Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 256–267.
  34. Matzutt, R., Hiller, J., Henze, M., Ziegeldorf, J. H., Müllmann, D., Hohlfeld, O. & Wehrle, K. (2018). A Quantitative Analysis of the Impact of Arbitrary Blockchain Content on Bitcoin. In Financial Cryptography and Data Security; Meiklejohn, S., Sako, K., Eds.; Springer: Berlin-Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; pp. 420–438.
  35. Giron, A. A., Martina, J. E. & Custódio, R. (2021). Steganographic Analysis of Blockchains. Sensors. 21(12): 4078. DOI:10.3390/s21124078
  36. Hashim, M. M., Rahim, M. S. M., Johi, F. A., Taha, M. S. & Hamad, H. S. (2018). Performance evaluation measurement of image steganography techniques with analysis of LSB based on variation image formats. International Journal of Engineering & Technology. 7(4):3505-3514. DOI:10.14419/ijet.v7i4.17294
  37. Al-Refai, S. & Al-Jarrah, M. M. (2020). Secure Data Hiding Technique Using Batch Video Steganography. In Proceedings of the 2019 2nd International Conference on Information Hiding and Image Processing (IHIP 2019). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–4. DOI:10.1145/3383913.3383914
  38. Pinchen Cui, P., Guin, U., Skjellum, A. & Umphress, D. (2019). Blockchain in IoT: Current Trends, Challenges, and Future Roadmap. Journal of Hardware and Systems Security. 3(4):338-364. DOI:10.1007/s41635-019-00079-5
  39. Yan, T., Chen, W., Zhao, P. & et al. (2021). Handling conditional queries and data storage on Hyperledger Fabric efficiently. World Wide Web. 24:441–461. DOI:10.1007/s11280-020-00844-5
  40. Takaoğlu, M., Dursun, T., Doğan, A., Er, H., Bozkurt Günay, B., Emeç, C., Kumru, A., Demir, S., Kurt Toplu, S. & Özcandan, N. (2023). The Impact of Self-Sovereign Identities on CyberSecurity. IST-186-RSM, Specialist Meeting, Blockchain Technology for Coalition Operations. https://bilgem.tubitak.gov.tr/uekae-yayinlar/
  41. Khan, D., Jung, L. T., Hashmani, M. A. & Cheong, M. K. (2022). Empirical Performance Analysis of Hyperledger LTS for Small and Medium Enterprises. Sensors. 22(3):915. DOI:10.3390/s22030915
  42. Chacko, J. A., Mayer, R. & Jacobsen, H. A. (2021). Why Do My Blockchain Transactions Fail? A Study of Hyperledger Fabric. In Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 221–234. DOI:10.1145/3448016.3452823
  43. Zhou, E., Sun, H., Pi, B., Sun, j., Yamashita, K. & Nomura, Y. (2019). Ledgerdata Refiner: A Powerful Ledger Data Query Platform for Hyperledger Fabric. Sixth International Conference on Internet of Things: Systems, Management and Security (IOTSMS), Granada, Spain, 433-440. DOI: 10.1109/IOTSMS48152.2019.8939212
  44. Ke, Z. & Park, N. (2022). Performance modeling and analysis of Hyperledger Fabric. Cluster Comput. DOI:10.1007/s10586-022-03800-2
  45. Song, M., Han, J., Eom, H. & Son, Y. (2022). IPFSz: An Efficient Data Compression Scheme in InterPlanetary File System. in IEEE Access. 10:122601-122611. DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3223107
  46. Benet, J. (2014). IPFS documentation. https://docs.ipfs.tech/
  47. Muralidharan, S. & Ko, H. (2019). An InterPlanetary File System (IPFS) based IoT framework. 2019 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE), Las Vegas, NV, USA, 2019, pp. 1-2. DOI:10.1109/ICCE.2019.8662002
  48. Bennett, C. H., Brassard, G. & Breidbart, S. (2014). Quantum Cryptography II: How to re-use a one-time pad safely even if P=NP. Nat Comput. 13(4):453-458. DOI:10.1007/s11047-014-9453-6
  49. Frankel, J. & Pepper, T. (2000). Gnutella. https://www.gnutellaforums.com/