Journals / Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 25 Sayı: 3

Examining The Rules in Nuclear and Origin Families Living in Turkey

Türkiye’de Yaşayan Çekirdek ve Köken Ailelerdeki Kuralların İncelenmesi

Pages
393–405
Publication Date
2023-09-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found that the rules about couple relationships, family relationships, parenting, and spirituality/values were similar in nuclear and families of origin but that although the rules of the relationships with the family of origin/relatives and budget management were expressed in nuclear families, they were not expressed in families of origin.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aimed to examine married couples’ descriptions of themselves, their spouses, mothers, and fathers and their views about the rules in their nuclear and families of origin.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study group consisted of 12 married individuals, including eight females and four males, who were aged between 23 and 49, were not married to another participant, lived in the central county of a province in the central Anatolia region.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found that the rules about couple relationships, family relationships, parenting, and spirituality/values were similar in nuclear and families of origin but that although the rules of the relationships with the family of origin/relatives and budget management were expressed in nuclear families, they were not expressed in families of origin.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Aile · aile kuralları · çekirdek aile

Abstract

This study aimed to examine married couples’ descriptions of themselves, their spouses, mothers, and fathers and their views about the rules in their nuclear and families of origin. The study group consisted of 12 married individuals, including eight females and four males, who were aged between 23 and 49, were not married to another participant, lived in the central county of a province in the central Anatolia region. The study used the phenomenological research design, which is one of the qualitative research approaches. The data were collected through semi-structured interviews, one of the qualitative research techniques, and analyzed with the content analysis method. The results of the study indicated that altruism and submissiveness were the common and prominent descriptions of the female participants about themselves and the descriptions of all participants about their mothers, whereas cold and distant were common descriptions of the participants about their mothers and fathers. It was found that the rules about couple relationships, family relationships, parenting, and spirituality/values were similar in nuclear and families of origin but that although the rules of the relationships with the family of origin/relatives and budget management were expressed in nuclear families, they were not expressed in families of origin.

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı, evli bireylerin kendilerine ve eşlerine; annelerine ve babalarına ilişkin tanımlamaları ile çekirdek ailelerindeki ve köken ailelerindeki kurallara ilişkin görüşlerini incelemektir. Araştırmanın çalışma grubu Orta Anadolu’da bir il merkezinde yaşayan, birbirleriyle evli olmayan ve yaşları 23 ile 49 arasında değişen sekizi kadın dördü erkek olmak üzere toplam 12 evli bireyden oluşmaktadır. Bu araştırmada nitel araştırma yaklaşımlarından biri olan fenomenolojik araştırma deseni kullanılmıştır. Verileri toplamak için nitel araştırma tekniklerinden biri olan yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeden ve verilerin analizinde ise içerik analizi yönteminden yararlanılmıştır. Araştırmanın sonucunda kadınların kendilerine ilişkin tanımlamaları ile tüm katılımcıların annelerine ilişkin tanımlamalarında fedakâr olma ve alttan almanın ortak olarak ön plana çıktığı; anne ve babalarına ilişkin tanımlamalarında ise soğuk ve mesafeli olmanın ortak özellik olduğu bulgusuna ulaşılmıştır. Çift ilişkisi, aile ilişkisi, çocuk yetiştirme ve değerlere ilişkin kuralların çekirdek ve köken ailelerde benzerlik gösterdiği; bununla birlikte köken aile ve akraba ilişkileri ve bütçe yönetimine ilişkin kuralların çekirdek ailelerinde ifade edilmesine rağmen köken ailelerde ifade edilmediği bulunmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ULUSOY, Y., KILIÇARSLAN, S. (2023). Examining The Rules in Nuclear and Origin Families Living in Turkey. Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 25 Sayı: 3, 393–405. https://ajindex.com/articles/962773

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Adler, A. (1994). Recognition of human nature. (Trans. A. Yörükhan). Istanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Cultural Publications. Adler, A. (1999). Cooperation between the sexes. (Trans. S. Cypress). Istanbul: Payel Publishing House. Allsop, D. B., Leavitt, C. E., Clarke, R. W., Driggs, S. M., Gurr, J. B., Marks, L. D., & Dollahite, D. C. (2021). Perspectives from highly religious families on boundaries and rules about sex. Journal of religion and health, 60(3), 1576-1599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-020-01171-9
  2. Aluş, Y. (2015) Evaluation of the family understanding and Turkish family in terms of our cultural and social reality. PESA International Journal of Social Studies, 1(1), 15-24.
  3. ASAGEM (2009). Divorce reasons research. Ankara: T.C. Publications of the Prime Ministry General Directorate of Family and Social Research. ASAGEM, (2010a). Family Structure Survey 2006 Ankara: T.C. Publications of the Prime Ministry General Directorate of Family and Social Research. ASAGEM. (2010b). Family Values Research in Turkey, (Edt. M. Turgut), T.C. Prime Ministry General Directorate of Family and Social Research, Publication No: 145, Ankara.
  4. ASAGEM (2011). Family structure research in Turkey 2011. Ankara: T.C. Prime Ministry Family and Community Services General Directorate Publications. Aykan, H. & Wolf, D.A. (2000). “Traditionality, modernity and household composition”. Research on Aging, 22(4):359-421.
  5. Aslan Cevheroğlu, B., & Kışlak, Ş. (2022). A qualitative study on how early married women experienced the married woman role. AYNA Journal of Clinical Psychology, 9(1), 207–233. https://doi.org/10.31682/ayna.910951
  6. Belli, A., & Aynacı, G. (2020). The perception of the gender roles amongst university students; How can women empower themselves? OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 15(26), 4208-4229. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.663605
  7. Bepko, C. & Krestan, J. (1998). Good women unhappy lives (Trans. C. Ener Sılay). Istanbul, Ilhan Publishing House. Bilgin, V. (1998). Adoption and Ownership Levels of Family Institution in Turkish Society. Journal of Ondokuz Mayıs University Faculty of Theology. 10(10), 387-414.
  8. Bowen, M. (1978). Family therapy in clinical practice. New York: Jason Aronson. Bryant, C. M., Conger, R. D., & Meehan, J. M. (2001). The influence of in-laws on change in marital success. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(3), 614–626. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00614
  9. Bulut, I. (1993). The effect of mental health on family functions. Prime