Journals / Çukurova Anestezi ve Cerrahi Bilimler Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2

Retrospective evaluation of children with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug allergy

Non-steroidal antiinflamatuar ilaç alerjisi olan çocukların retrospektif değerlendirilmesi

Pages
215–219
Publication Date
2023-08-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In our study, it was revealed that drug provocation tests should be performed to confirm the diagnosis in case of suspected NSAIDs allergy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are among the most commonly used drugs and are among the drug-related hypersensitivity reactions after antibiotics.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this group of patients, age, gender, fx5 (nutrient mix specific IgE), phadiatop (inhalant allergen mix specific IgE), skin prick tests and drug provocation tests were recorded from their files.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In our study, it was revealed that drug provocation tests should be performed to confirm the diagnosis in case of suspected NSAIDs allergy.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Non-steroidal antiinflamatuar ilaç alerjisi · izole anjioödem · ilaç provokasyon testi

Abstract

Aim: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are among the most commonly used drugs and are among the drug-related hypersensitivity reactions after antibiotics. There are limited studies evaluating nonsteroidal drug reactions in children. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the concomitant atopic diseases, admission clinic, laboratory findings and drug provocation test results of children with a pre-diagnosis of nonsteroidal drug reaction and who underwent allergy tests, retrospectively . Methods: In this study, patients who applied to the pediatric allergy outpatient clinic due to nonsteroidal drug reaction were included. In this group of patients, age, gender, fx5 (nutrient mix specific IgE), phadiatop (inhalant allergen mix specific IgE), skin prick tests and drug provocation tests were recorded from their files. Demographic and clinical features of the cases were compared. Results: 61 patients with suspected NSAIDs allergy were included in the study. When the admission clinics of the patients were evaluated, 54% (n:33) had urticaria, 22.9% (n:14) had isolated angioedema, 6.5% (n:4) had urticaria angioedema, 14.7% (n:9) had maculopapular eruption . Only 1 patient presented with anaphylaxis. NSAIDs allergy was confirmed in 16.3% (n:10) of the patients.. Single ibuprofen sensitivity was detected in 13.1% of patients (n:8), both paracetamol and ibuprofen sensitivity were detected in 1 patient (1.6%), and single paracetamol sensitivity was detected in 1 patient (1.6%). Conclusions: It is usually not easy to detect drug allergies in patients. These patients may usually misdiagnosed as NSAIDs allergy. In our study, it was revealed that drug provocation tests should be performed to confirm the diagnosis in case of suspected NSAIDs allergy.

Özet

Özet Amaç: Non-steroidal antiinflamatuar ilaçlar (NSAİİ), sık kullanılan ilaçlar arasındadır ve ilaç ilişkili aşırı duyarlılık reaksiyonları arasında antibiyotiklerden sonra yer almaktadır. Çocuklarda nonsteroid ilaç reaksiyonlarının değerlendirildiği sınırlı sayıda çalışma vardır. Bu çalışmada nonsteroid ilaç reaksiyonu ön tanısı ile gelen ve alerji testleri yapılan çocukların eşlik eden atopik hastalıklar, başvuru kliniği, laboratuvar bulgularının ve ilaç provokasyon testi sonuçlarının retrospektif olarak değerlendirilmesi amaçlandı. Yöntem: Bu çalışmada çocuk alerji polikliniğine nonsteroid ilaç reaksiyonu nedeniyle başvuran hastalar alınmıştır. Bu gruptaki hastalarda yaş, cinsiyet, fx5 ( besin mix spesifik IgE), phadiatop (inhalan alerjen mix spesifik IgE), deri prick testleri ve ilaç provokasyon testleri bilgileri dosyalarından alınarak kaydedildi. Olguların demografik ve klinik özellikleri karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: NSAİİ allerjisi şüphesi olan 61 hasta çalışmaya dahil edildi. Hastaların başvuru klinikleri değerlendirildiğinde %54 (n:33)’ünün ürtiker, %22.9 (n:14)’unun izole anjioödem, %6.5 (n:4)’ uğunun ürtiker anjioödem, %14.7 (n:9)’sinin ise makülopapüler erupsiyon nedeniyle başvurdukları görüldü. Sadece 1 hasta anafilaksi ile başvurmuştu. Hastaların %16.3 (n:10)’ ünde NSAİİ alerjisi doğrulandı. Hastaların %13. 1(n:8)’inde tekli ibuprofen duyarlılığı tespit edilirken, 1 hastada (%1.6) hem parasetamol hem de ibuprofen duyarlılığı, 1 hastada (%1.6) parasetamol duyarlılığı tespit edildi. Sonuç: Hastalarda ilaç alerjisinin tespit edilmesi genellikle çok kolay olmamaktadır. Bu hastalar sıklıkla yanlış olarak ilaç alerjisi tanısı alabilmektedir. Çalışmamızda NSAİİ alerjisi şüphesi durumunda tanıyı doğrulamak için ilaç provokasyon testlerinin yapılması gerektiği ortaya konulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDOĞDU, A., AKÇAM, N. Y. (2023). Retrospective evaluation of children with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug allergy. Çukurova Anestezi ve Cerrahi Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 215–219. https://ajindex.com/articles/960348

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Johansson SG, Bieber T, Dahl R, et al. Revised nomenclature for allergy for global use: Report of the Nomenclature Review Committee of the World Allergy Organization. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2004 2- Waheed A., Hill T., Dhawan N. Drug Allergy (2016) Primary Care 2016 Sep
  2. 43(3):393-400 3- Dykewicz M.S., Lam J.K. Drug Hypersensitivity Reactions Medical Clinics of North America, 2020 Jan
  3. 104(1):109-128. 4-Demoly P, Bousquet J. Epidemiology of drug allergy. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2001
  4. 10 5-Impicciatore P, Choonara I, Clarkson A, Provasi D, Pandolfini C, Bonati M. Incidence of adverse drug reactions in paediatric in/outpatients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Br j Clin Pharmacol. 2001
  5. 52(1):77-83.) 6-Gomes ER, Demoly P. Epidemiology of hypersensitivity drug reactions. Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology 2005
  6. 5(4):309-316. 7-Edwards IR, Aronson JK. Adverse drug reactions: definitions, diagnosis, and management. Lancet. 2000 Oct 7
  7. 356(9237):1255-9. 8-Zambonino M.A, Torres M.J, Muñoz et al.Drug provocation tests in the diagnosis of hypersensitivity reactions to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in children Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2013 Mar
  8. 24(2):151-9. 9-Kowalski ML, Asero R, Bavbek S, et al. Classification and practical approach to the diagnosis and management of hypersensitivity to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Allergy. 2013 Oct
  9. 68(10):1219-32 10-Weiland SK, Björkstén B, Brunekreef B,et al. Phase II of the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC II): Rationale and methods. Eur Respir J 2004
  10. Aberer W.,Bircher A., Romano A.et al.Drug provocation testing in the diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity reactions: general considerations Allergy 2003 Sep
  11. 58(9):854-63. 12- Atanaskovic-Markovic M, Blanca-Lopez N., Gomes E. et al. A Multicenter Retrospective Study on Hypersensitivity Reactions to Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) in Children: A Report from the European Network on Drug Allergy (ENDA) Group Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, 2020-03-01, Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages 1022-1031.e1 ) 13-Renaudin JM, Beaudouin E, Ponvert C, et al. Severe drug-induced anaphylaxis: analysis of 333 cases recorded by the Allergy Vigilance Network from 2002 to 2010. Allergy, 2013
  12. 68(7), 929–937. 14-Ribeiro-Vaz I, Marques J, Demoly P, et al. Drug-induced anaphylaxis: a decade review of reporting to the Portuguese Pharmacovigilance Authority. European