Journals / Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2

Clinical Evaluation and Microleakage of Fissure Sealant: Effect of Laser Etching vs Acid Etching

Lazer ve Asit ile Pürüzlendirmenin Fissür Örtücünün Mikrosızıntısına Etkisi ve Klinik Değerlendirilmesi

Pages
110–117
Publication Date
2023-08-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: It is considered to determine the optimal energy level of laser will increase the clinical success.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical success and the sealing ability of a resin based fissure sealant that applied enamel surface which was etched with conventional phosphoric acid and Er:YAG laser at different energy levels.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: The study consisted of two parts; the evaluation of retention, marginal discoloration, marginal integrity and new caries formation for the clinical success after the treatment at 3, 6, 12 months; the evaluation of microleakage and penetration depth to fissures using dye penetration test.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: It is considered to determine the optimal energy level of laser will increase the clinical success.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Enamel · Fissure Sealants · Er-YAG Laser

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical success and the sealing ability of a resin based fissure sealant that applied enamel surface which was etched with conventional phosphoric acid and Er:YAG laser at different energy levels. Material and Methods: The study consisted of two parts; the evaluation of retention, marginal discoloration, marginal integrity and new caries formation for the clinical success after the treatment at 3, 6, 12 months; the evaluation of microleakage and penetration depth to fissures using dye penetration test. The in vivo part of the study was the surface preparation processes, 72 teeth in each group; It consists of 32% phosphoric Acid, Er:YAG laser- MSP (Medium Short Pulse) and Er:YAG laser- QSP (Quantum Square Pulse). A total of 45 impacted human third molar teeth were used for in vitro part. Data were analyzed using SPSS 21. Results: The relationship between the success rates of 12-month clinical follow-up of fissure sealants and age, gender, and localization was assessed and there was no statistically significant correlation. When all criteria were considered, the most successful group was QSP. All the groups demonstrated microleakage regardless of the surface preparation techniques. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups. Conclusion: It is considered to determine the optimal energy level of laser will increase the clinical success.

Özet

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical success and the sealing ability of a resin based fissure sealant that applied enamel surface which was etched with conventional phosphoric acid and Er:YAG laser at different energy levels.Materials and Methods: The study consisted of two parts; the evaluation of retention, marginal discoloration, marginal integrity and new caries formation for the clinical success after the treatment at 3, 6, 12 months; the evaluation of microleakage and penetration depth to fissures using dye penetration test. The study consists of 3 groups: Acid, MSP and QSP with 72 teeth in each group for in vivo part. A total of 45 impacted human third molar teeth were used for in vitro part. Data were analyzed using SPSS 21.Results: The relationship between the success rates of 12-month clinical follow-up of fissure sealants and age, gender, and localization was assessed and there was no statistically significant correlation. When all criteria were considered, the most successful group was QSP. All the groups demonstrated microleakage regardless of the surface preparation techniques. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups.Conclusion: It is considered to determine the optimal energy level of laser will increase the clinical success.

🔖

Cite This Article

BOSTANCI, B., FİDANCIOĞLU, Y. D. (2023). Clinical Evaluation and Microleakage of Fissure Sealant: Effect of Laser Etching vs Acid Etching. Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Dergisi, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2, 110–117. https://ajindex.com/articles/959674

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Lam A. Increase in Utilization Of Dental Sealants. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008;9:81-7
  2. Subramaniam P, Konde S, Mandanna DK. Retention Of A Resin-Based Sealant And A Glass Ionomer Used As A Fissure Sealant: A Comparative Clinical Study. J In-dian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2008;26:114-20
  3. Beauchamp J, Caufield PW, Crall JJ, Donly K, Feigal R, Gooch B, Ismail A, Kohn W, Siegal M, Simonsen R. Evidence-Based Clinical Recommendations For The Use Of Pit-And-Fissure Sealants: A Report Of The American Dental Association Council On Scientific Affairs. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008;139:257-68
  4. Fejerskov O. Changing Paradigms In Concepts On Dental Caries: Consequences For Oral Health Care. Caries Res. 2004;38:182-91
  5. Cehreli SB, Gungor HC, Karabulut E. Er,Cr:YSGG Laser Pretreatment Of Primary Teeth For Bonded Fissure Sealant Application: A Quantitative Microleakage Study. J Adhes Dent. 2006;8:381-6
  6. Khan AA. The Permanent First Molar As An İndicator For Predicting Caries Activity. Int Dental J. 1994;44:623-7
  7. Pardi V, Sinhoreti MA, Pereira AC, Ambrosano GM, Meneghim MDE C. In Vitro Evaluation Of Microleak-age Of Different Materials Used As Pit-And-Fissure Sealants. Braz Dent J. 2006;17:49-52
  8. Griffin SO, Oong E, Kohn W, Vidakovic B, Gooch BF, Bader J et al. The Effectiveness Of Sealants in Manag-ing Caries Lesions. J Dent Res. 2008;87:169-74
  9. Cohen L, Sheiham A. The Use Of Pit And Fissure Seal-ants in The General Dental Service İn Great Britain And Northern Ireland. Br Dent J. 1988;165:50-3
  10. Simonsen RJ. Pit And Fissure Sealant: Review Of The Literature. Pediatr Dent. 2002;24:393-414
  11. Simonsen RJ. Retention And Effectiveness Of Dental Sealant After 15 Years. J Am Dent Assoc. 1991;122:34-42
  12. Bhatia M, Patel A, Shirol D. Evaluation Of Two Resin Based Fissure Sealants: A Comparative Clinical Study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2012;30:227-30
  13. Yazici AR, Karaman E, Baseren M, Tuncer D, Yazici E, Unluer S. Clinical Evaluation Of A Nanofilled Fissure Sealant Placed With Different Adhesive Systems: 24-Month Results. Oper Dent. 2009;34:642-7
  14. Garcia-Godoy F, Harris ON, Helm DM. Primary Pre-ventive Dentistry. In Harris ON, Godoy-Garcia F (ed), 6th edn. New Jersey, Pearson, 2009; pp 285-318
  15. Karandish M. The Efficiency Of Laser Application On The Enamel Surface: A Systematic Review. J Lasers Med Sci. 2014;5:108-14
  16. Lukac M, Primc NM, Pirnat S. Quantum Square Pulse Er:YAG Lasers For Fast And Precise Hard Dental Tis-sue Preparation. J LAH