Journals / Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 21 Sayı: 2

Evaluation of Sustainability Studies in Early Childhood

Erken Çocuklukta Sürdürülebilirlik Çalışmalarına Yönelik Bir Değerlendirme

Pınar Bağçeli Kahraman(ULUDAĞ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-0551-7741
Hazal Poyraz Rüstemoğlu(Kütahya Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi)0000-0002-4948-1576
Pages
776–797
Publication Date
2023-08-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

When the concepts in the results of the research were examined, it was found that all dimensions of sustainability, the development of sustainability, and the concepts related to the environment were generally included.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study is a meta-synthesis study aiming to evaluate the studies on sustainability in the field of early childhood education based on their various characteristics.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the research, 51 studies published in the databases of ERIC, Dergipark, and WoS (Web of Science) on the concept of sustainability in the field of early childhood education between 2017-2022 were examined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:When the concepts in the results of the research were examined, it was found that all dimensions of sustainability, the development of sustainability, and the concepts related to the environment were generally included.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017-2022 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Erken çocukluk eğitimi · Erken çocukluk eğitimi için sürdürülebilir kalkınma · Sürdürülebilir kalkınma

Abstract

This study is a meta-synthesis study aiming to evaluate the studies on sustainability in the field of early childhood education based on their various characteristics. In the research, 51 studies published in the databases of ERIC, Dergipark, and WoS (Web of Science) on the concept of sustainability in the field of early childhood education between 2017-2022 were examined. For the studies to be included in the research, the following criteria were adopted: being conducted in the field of early childhood education and including the phrases of “Sürdürülebilirlik’, "Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma’’, “Erken Çocukluk Eğitimi için Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma”, “Erken Çocukluk Eğitimi ve Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma and "Sustainable Development", "Sustainable Development for Early Childhood Education". The findings of the research were presented under certain themes using the meta-synthesis research method. As a result of the analysis of the data, it was determined that although the studies had increased over the years, they decreased during the Covid-19 pandemic affecting the whole world and were not yet sufficient, the studies were generally focused on the qualitative research method, and the findings were presented under certain themes. In the studies, it was seen that mostly the environmental dimension or all dimensions of sustainability were aimed to be included together. When the concepts in the results of the research were examined, it was found that all dimensions of sustainability, the development of sustainability, and the concepts related to the environment were generally included.

Özet

Bu çalışma, erken çocukluk eğitimi alanında sürdürülebilirlik konusunda yapılmış olan çalışmaları çeşitli özelliklerine göre değerlendirmeyi amaçlayan bir meta-sentez çalışmasıdır. Araştırmada 01.01.2017 ve 01.02.2022 tarihleri arasında erken çocukluk eğitimi alanında sürdürülebilirlik kavramına ilişkin ERIC, Dergipark ve WoS (Web of Science) veritabanlarında yayınlanan 51 çalışma incelenmiştir. Araştırma kapsamına alınan çalışmaların erken çocukluk eğitimi alanında yapılmış olması, konu başlığında “Sürdürülebilirlik’, "Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma’’, “Erken Çocukluk Eğitimi için Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma”, “Erken Çocukluk Eğitimi ve Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma” ile “Sustainable Development’’ ve ‘’Sustainable Development for Early Childhood Education’’ ifadelerinden birinin geçmesi ölçüt olarak benimsenmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular, meta-sentez araştırma yöntemi kullanılarak belirli temalar altında sunulmuştur. Verilerin analizi sonucunda, çalışmaların yıllara göre artmakla birlikte, tüm dünyayı etkileyen Covid-19 pandemisi sürecinde azaldığı, genel olarak nitel araştırma yönteminin ağırlıklı olduğu ve çalışmalarda çoğunlukla sürdürülebilirliğin sadece çevre boyutunun veya tüm boyutlarının birlikte kullanıldığı belirlenmiştir. Araştırmaların sonuçlarında yer alan kavramlara bakıldığında genel olarak sürdürülebilirliğin tüm boyutlarına, sürdürülebilirliğin geliştirilmesine ve çevre ile ilgili kavramlara yer verildiği görülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kahraman, P. B., Rüstemoğlu, H. P. (2023). Evaluation of Sustainability Studies in Early Childhood. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 21 Sayı: 2, 776–797. https://doi.org/10.37217/tebd.1149507

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (55)

  1. Alıcı, Ş. (2020). Erken çocuklukta sürdürülebilirlik ve çevre eğitimi. Ş. Ünlü-Çetin (Ed.). Erken çocukluk fen eğitiminde temel konular ve güncel yaklaşımlar içinde (s. 257-267). Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık
  2. Ampartzaki, M., Kalogiannakis, M. & Papadakis, S. (2021). Deepening our knowledge about sustainability education in the early years: Lessons from a water project. Education Sciences, 11(6), 251, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11060251
  3. Barrable, A. (2019). Refocusing environmental education in the early years: A brief introduction to a pedagogy for connection. Education Sciences, 9(1), 61, 2-8. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9010061
  4. Bautista, A., Moreno-Núñez, A., Ng, S. C. & Bull, R. (2018). Preschool educators’ interactions with children about sustainable development: planned and incidental conversations. International Journal of Early Childhood, 50(1), 15-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-018-0213-0
  5. Borg, F. & Samuelsson, I. P. (2022). Preschool children’s agency in education for sustainability: The case of Sweden. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293x.2022.2026439
  6. Borg, F., Winberg, T. M. & Vinterek, M. (2019). Preschool children’s knowledge about the environmental impact of various modes of transport. Early Child Development and Care, 189(3), 376-391. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2017.1324433
  7. Boyd, W. (2020). ‘Nothing goes to waste’: A professional learning programme for early childhood centres. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 45(1), 69-81. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1836939119885313
  8. Bruntland, G. (1987). Our common future: the world commission on environment and development, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  9. Bulut, Y. & Polat, Ö. (2019). Erken çocukluk eğitiminde sürdürülebilirlik kavramının incelenmesi. Fırat Üniversitesi Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 3(2), 35-58.
  10. Caiman, C., Hedefalk, M. & Ottander, C. (2022). Pre-school teaching for creative processes in education for sustainable development–invisible animal traces, purple hands, and an elk container. Environmental Education Research, 28(3), 457-475. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2021.2012130
  11. Çağlar-Kabacık, S. & Deretarla-Gül, E. (2021). Okul öncesi eğitim ve permakültür. OPUS Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 18[Eğitim Bilimleri Özel Sayısı], 5140 – 5156.
  12. Çalık, M. & Sözbilir, M. (2014). İçerik analizinin parametreleri. Eğitim ve Bilim, 39(174), 33-38. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2014.3412
  13. Daş, B. E., Aslan, A. & Yadigaroğlu, E. (2021). Okul dışı öğrenme ortamlarının 4-6 yaş çocuklarının sağlığı, gelişimi ve sürdürülebilir kalkınma bilinci üzerindeki etkileri. Environments, 6(1), 87-124.
  14. Davis, J. (2009). Revealing the research ‘hole’ of early childhood education for sustainability: A preliminary survey of the literature. Environmental Education Research, 15(2), 227-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620802710607
  15. Duhn, I. (2012). Making ‘place’ for ecological sustainability in early childhood education. Environmental Education Research, 18(1), 19-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2011.572162
  16. Duran, M. & Bozok, Ş. (2021). Views of pre-school teacher candidates on sustainable development. Journal of Individual Differences in Education, 3(2), 44-59.
  17. Erkut, E. (2020). Covid-19 sonrası yükseköğretim. Yükseköğretim Dergisi, 10(2), 125-133. https://doi.org/10.2399/yod.20.002
  18. Fien, J. (2004). Education for sustainability. J. Fien, (Ed.), Environmental education: a pathway to sustainability içinde (s. 24-32). Geelong: Deakin University Press.
  19. Ginsburg, J. L. & Audley, S. (2020). "You don't wanna teach little kids about climate change": Beliefs and barriers to sustainability education in early childhood. International Journal of Early Childhood Environmental Education, 7(3), 42-61. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1264526.pdf sayfasından erişilmiştir.
  20. Gülçiçek, T. (2021). The relationship between pre-service early childhood teachers’ environmental education self-efficacy beliefs and their attitudes towards sustainable environment. Academia Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(2), 431-441. https://doi.org/10.53506/egitim.901759
  21. Güler-Yildiz, T., Özdemir-Simsek, P., Eren, S. & Aydos, E. H. (2017). An analysis of the views and experiences of children who are 48-66 months old, their parents, and teachers about" sustainable development". Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 17(2), 653-677. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2017.2.0013
  22. Hedefalk, M., Almqvist, J. & Östman, L. (2015). Education for sustainable development in early childhood education: a review of the research literature. Environmental Education Research, 21(7), 975-990. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2014.971716
  23. Hirst, N. (2019). Education for sustainability within early childhood studies: Collaboration and inquiry through projects with children. Education 3-13, 47(2), 233-246. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2018.1430843
  24. Ilovan, O. R., Dulama, M. E., Xenia, H. N. K., Botan, C. N., Horvath, C., Nitoaia, A.,. & Rus, G. M. (2019). Environmental education and education for sustainable development in Romania. Teachers' perceptions and recommendations. Romanian Review of Geographical Education, 8(2), 21-37. https://doi.org/10.24193/RRGE220192
  25. Kahriman-Pamuk, D. & Olgan, R. (2018). Teacher practices and preschool physical environment for education for sustainable development: Eco vs ordinary preschools. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(2), 669-683. https://doi.org/10.17860/mersinefd.391312
  26. Kahriman-Pamuk, D. & Olgan, R. (2020). Comparing predictors of teachers’ education for sustainable development practices among eco and non-eco preschools. Egitim ve Bilim, 45(203), 327-345. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2019.8774
  27. Kahriman-Pamuk, D., Uzun, N. B., Yıldız, T. G. & Haktanır, G. (2019). Reliability of indicators measuring early childhood education for sustainability: a study in Turkey using generalizability theory. International Journal of Early Childhood, 51(2), 193-206. https://doi:0.17860/mersinefd.391312
  28. Kartal, E. E. & Ada, E. (2019). Okul öncesi öğretmen adaylarının çevre problemleri ve geri dönüşüm hakkındaki görüşleri. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(1), 818-847.
  29. Larsson, J. & Samuelsson, I. P. (2019). Collective resources as a precursor for educating children toward a sustainable global world. Ecnu Review of Education, 2(4), 396-420. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2096531119886506
  30. Leicht, A., Heiss, J. & Byun, W. J. (2018). Issues and trends in education for sustainable development (5. b.). France: Unesco Publishing.
  31. Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (1986). But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New Directions For Program Evaluation, 30, 73-84. https://doi.org/10.1002
  32. Maidou, A., Plakitsi, K. & Polatoglou, H. (2019). Knowledge, perceptions and attitudes on education for sustainable development of pre-service early childhood teachers in Greece. World Journal of Education, 9(5), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v9n5p1
  33. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research. A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: John Wiley-Sons.
  34. Munasinghe, M. (2003). Analysing the nexus of sustainable development and climate change: an overview. Sri Lanka: OECD.
  35. O’Flaherty, J. & Liddy, M. (2018). The impact of development education and education for sustainable development interventions: a synthesis of the research. Environmental Education Research, 24(7), 1031-1049. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1392484
  36. Önder, A. & Özkan, B. (2013). Sürdürülebilir çocuk gelişimi: Okul öncesi etkinliklerle çevre eğitimi. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık
  37. Pamuk, S., Öztürk, N., Pamuk, D. K., Elmas, R., Yıldız, T. G. & Haktanır, G. (2021). A collaboration project on education for sustainability: Professional development needs of Turkish preschool teachers. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 14(4), 586-604. https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.892384
  38. Polat, S. & Ay, O. (2016). Meta-sentez: Kavramsal bir çözümleme. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 4(1), 52-64. https://doi.org/10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.4c2s3m
  39. Shore, M. (2021). Integrating sustainable development goals with early childhood learning in Indonesia. Childhood Education, 97(1), 68-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2021.1873697
  40. Singer-Brodowski, M., Brock, A., Etzkorn, N. & Otte, I. (2019). Monitoring of education for sustainable development in Germany–insights from early childhood education, school and higher education. Environmental Education Research, 25(4), 492-507. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2018.1440380
  41. Skarstein, T. H. & Skarstein, F. (2020). Curious children and knowledgeable adults–early childhood student-teachers’ species identification skills and their views on the importance of species knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 42(2), 310-328. https://doi.org/1080/09500693.2019.1710782
  42. Sözbilir, M. & Gül, Ş. (2015). Thematic content analysis of scale development studies published in the field of science and mathematics education. Education and Science, 40(178), 85-102. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2015.4070
  43. Toran, M. (2017). Erken çocukluk eğitimi için sürdürülebilir kalkınma: Türkiye kökenli yayınlara yönelik bir değerlendirme. Erken Çocukluk Çalışmaları Dergisi, 1(1), 33-34. https://doi.org/10.24130
  44. Uludağ, G., Karademir, A. H. & Cingi, M. A. (2017). Okul öncesi öğretmen adaylarının sürdürülebilir çevreye ilişkin davranış düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(41), 120-136. https://doi.org/10.21764/efd.01513
  45. United Nations. (2015). United Nations sustainable development summit 2015. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/summit sayfasından erişilmiştir.
  46. UNESCO. (2005). United Nations decade of education for sustainable development (2005-2014). http://Portal.Unesco.Org/Education/Admin/Ev.Php sayfasından erişilmiştir.
  47. UNESCO. (2009). Rewiew of contexts and structures for education for sustainable development. Paris: Unesco
  48. UNESCO. (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. https://Www.Un.Org/Sustainabledevelopment/Sustainable-Development-Goals sayfasından erişilmiştir.
  49. Ursavaş, N. & Aytar, A. (2018). Okul öncesi öğrencilerinin su farkındalığı ve su okuryazarlıklarındaki gelişimin incelenmesi: Proje tabanlı bir araştırma. İnformal Ortamlarda Araştırmalar Dergisi, 3(1), 19-45.
  50. Wang, G., Zhou, X. & Cui, H. (2019). Exploring education for sustainable development in a Chinese kindergarten: an action research. Ecnu Review of Education, 2(4), 497-514. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2096531119897638
  51. Yaralı, K. T. & Didin, E. (2018). Sürdürülebilir gelişme amaçlı eğitimde etkili bir örnek: “Küçük ağaç’ın eğitimi”. Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19(35), 849-868. https://doi.org/0.21550/sosbilder.350313
  52. Yıldırım, G. (2020). Sürdürülebilirlik konusundaki eğitim araştırmalarının tematik olarak incelenmesi. Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 14(33), 70-106.
  53. Yıldırım A. & Şimşek H. (2018). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (11. b.) Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  54. WCED. (1987) Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  55. Ilovan, O. R., Dulama, M. E., Xenia, H. N. K., Botan, C. N., Horvath, C., Nitoaia, A.,. & Rus, G. M. (2019). Environmental education and education for sustainable development in Romania. Teachers' perceptions and recommendations. Romanian Review of Geographical Education, 8(2), 21-37. https://doi.org/10.24193/RRGE220192