Journals / Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 23 Sayı: 3

The Role of Job Crafting and Job Engagement in The Effect of Organizational Commitment on Job Performance

Pages
457–470
Publication Date
2023-07-24
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the context of all these results, it has been determined that job crafting and job engagement are effective mediating variables between organizational commitment and job performance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, it is aimed to determine the effect of organizational commitment on job performance, job engagement and job crafting, and to test whether there is a mediating effect of job crafting and job engagement in the interaction between organizational commitment and job performance, with hypotheses based on theoretical grounds.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study was conducted with data collected from 512 employees in an institution operating in the public sector.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the context of all these results, it has been determined that job crafting and job engagement are effective mediating variables between organizational commitment and job performance.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Organizational commitment · job performance · job crafting

Abstract

In this study, it is aimed to determine the effect of organizational commitment on job performance, job engagement and job crafting, and to test whether there is a mediating effect of job crafting and job engagement in the interaction between organizational commitment and job performance, with hypotheses based on theoretical grounds. In this study, a quantitative method was used as a research approach. This study was conducted with data collected from 512 employees in an institution operating in the public sector. As a result of the research, it has been revealed that organizational commitment has a positive effect on job performance. It has been observed that organizational commitment affects job performance in the same direction and job crafting plays a partial mediator role in this effect. In addition, the role of job engagement between organizational commitment and job performance was examined. As a result of this analysis, job engagement plays a partial mediator role between these two variables. In the context of all these results, it has been determined that job crafting and job engagement are effective mediating variables between organizational commitment and job performance.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNER, B., KİBAROĞLU, G. G., BASIM, H. N. (2023). The Role of Job Crafting and Job Engagement in The Effect of Organizational Commitment on Job Performance. Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi, Cilt: 23 Sayı: 3, 457–470. https://ajindex.com/articles/957273

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Agarwala, T., (2003), Innovative Human Resource Practices and Organizational Commitment: An Empirical Investigation, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14(2), 175-197.
  2. Allen, N. J.; Meyer, J. P. (1996),
  3. Affective, Continuance, and Normative Commitment to the Organization: An Examination of Construct Validity, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49, 252-276.
  4. Bakker, A. B.; Demerouti, E. (2008),
  5. Towards a Model of Work Engagement, Career Development International, (13)3, 209–223.
  6. Bakker, A. B.; Demerouti, E.; Verbeke, W. (2004), Using the Job Demands-Resources Model to Predict Burnout and Performance, Human Resource Management, 43(1), 83-104.
  7. Bakker, A. B.; Tims, M.; Derks, D. (2012), Proactive Personality and Job Performance: The Role of Job Crafting and Work Engagement, Human Relations, 65(10), 1359-1378.
  8. Bal, P. Matthijs; Lange, Annet H. De (2014), From Flexibility Human Resource Management to Employee Engagement and Perceived Job Performance Across the Lifespan: A Multisample Study, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 88(1), 126-154.
  9. Beck, J. W.; Shen, W. (2019), The Effects Of US Presidential Elections on Work Engagement and Job Performance, Applied Psychology: An International Review, 68(3), 547-576.
  10. Becton, J. B.; Matthews, M. C.; Hartley, D. L.; Whitaker, D. H. (2009),
  11. Using Biodata to Predict Turnover, Organizational Commitment, and Job Performance in Healthcare, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17(2), 189-202.
  12. Borman, W. C.; Motowidlo, S. J. (1993), Expanding the Criterion Domain to Include Elements of Contextual Performance, (Ed. N. Schmitt ve W. C. Borman), Personnel Selection in Organizations, Jossey-Bass: 71-98.
  13. Borman, W. C. (2004), The Concept of Organizational Citizenship, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(6), 238-241.
  14. Baron, R. M.; Kenny, D. A. (1986), The Moderator–Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
  15. Boyd, C. M.; Bakker, A. B.; Pignata, S.; Winefield, A. H.; Gillespie, N.; Stough, C. (2010), A Longitudinal Test of the Job Demands-Resources Model among Australian University Academics, Applied Psychology, 60(1), 112-140.
  16. Brief, A. P.; Motowidlo, S. J. (1986),
  17. Prosocial Organizational Behaviors, The Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 710-725.
  18. Brown, B. B., (2003), Employees’ Organizational Commitment and Their Perception of Superviso