SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 18 Sayı: 2

A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Framework Based on the MEREC Method for the Comprehensive Solution of Forklift Selection Problem

Forklift Seçim Probleminin Kapsamlı Çözümü için MEREC Yöntemine Dayalı Çok Kriterli Bir Karar Verme Çerçevesi

Nuh Keleş(TİCARET BAKANLIĞI)0000-0001-6768-728X
Pages
573–590
Publication Date
2023-08-01
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The different methods rankings are integrated using the Borda, and Copeland methods.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Forklift vehicles are used for lifting, lowering, loading, and transporting loads.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It was used six criteria, 13 alternatives, and the MEREC method.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The different methods rankings are integrated using the Borda, and Copeland methods.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:MCDM · MEREC · DNMEREC

Abstract

Forklift vehicles are used for lifting, lowering, loading, and transporting loads. Aimed of this study is the selection of a forklift vehicle with a combination of multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods. It was used six criteria, 13 alternatives, and the MEREC method. This study also presents a double normalization (DNMEREC) to contribute to a more convenient, and stable ranking of alternatives. 21 different methods were used to evaluate the alternatives: ARAS, CODAS, COPRAS, CoCoSo, ELECTRE, MABAC, EDAS, VIKOR, TOPSIS, SAW, WASPAS, PROMETHEE, MOORA, MOOSRA, MAIRCA, OCRA, PIV, GRA, ROV, MARCOS, PSI. The different methods rankings are integrated using the Borda, and Copeland methods.

Özet

Forklift araçları, yüklerin kaldırılması, indirilmesi, yüklenmesi ve taşınması için kullanılır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, çok kriterli karar verme (ÇKKV) yöntemlerinin bir kombinasyonuyla forklift seçimi yapmaktır. 6 kriter, 13 alternatif ve MEREC yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Bu çalışma ayrıca, alternatiflerin daha uygun ve istikrarlı bir şekilde sıralanmasına katkıda bulunmak için bir çift normalleştirme (DNMEREC) sunmaktadır. Alternatiflerin değerlendirilmesinde 21 farklı yöntem kullanılmıştır: ARAS, CODAS, COPRAS, CoCoSo, ELECTRE, MABAC, EDAS, VIKOR, TOPSIS, SAW, WASPAS, PROMETHEE, MOORA, MOOSRA, MAIRCA, OCRA, PIV, GRA, ROV, MARCOS, PSI. Farklı yöntem sıralamaları, Borda ve Copeland yöntemleri kullanılarak entegre edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Keleş, N., *, N. K. (2023). A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Framework Based on the MEREC Method for the Comprehensive Solution of Forklift Selection Problem. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 18 Sayı: 2, 573–590. https://doi.org/10.17153/oguiibf.1270016

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (29)

  1. Atanasković, P., Gajić, V., Dadić, I. ve Nikoličić, S. (2013), “Selection of forklift unit for warehouse operation by applying multi-criteria analysis”, Promet-Traffic&Transportation, Vol. 25, No. 4: 379-386. https://doi.org/10.7307/ptt.v25i4.1338
  2. Agarski, B., Hadzistevic, M., Budak, I., Moraca, S. ve Vukelic, D. (2019), “Comparison of approaches to weighting of multiple criteria for selecting equipment to optimize performance and safety”, International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, Vol. 25, No. 2: 228-240. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2017.1341126
  3. Biswas, S., Bandyopadhyay, G. ve Mukhopadhyaya, J. N. (2022), “A multi-criteria framework for comparing dividend pay capabilities: Evidence from Indian FMCG and consumer durable sector”, Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, Vol. 5, No. 2: 140-175. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame0306102022b
  4. Bogićević, Z., Pejčev, A. ve Marković, G. (2015), “Materials handling equipment selection using integrated fuzzy AHP and VIKOR methods”, IMK-14-Istraživanje i razvoj, Vol. 21, No. 3: 87-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.5937/IMK1503087B
  5. Danış, Y. A. (2022), “OECD Ülkelerinin TOPSIS, VIKOR ve GRA yöntemleri kullanılarak refah göstergelerine göre sıralanması ve bütünleşik bir çözüm önerisi”, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, Vol. 17, No. 2: 433-454.
  6. Demirci, A. ve Manavgat, G. (2021), “Veri Zarflama Analizi, TOPSİS ve VIKOR Teknikleriyle Forklift Aracı Seçimi: Karma Model Önerisi”. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Vol. 3, No. 1: 2-27, https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/husbdergi/issue/60365/775987
  7. Ecer, F. ve Hashemkhani Zolfani, S. (2022), “Evaluating economic freedom via a multi-criteria MEREC-DNMA model-based composite system: case of OPEC countries”, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, Vol. 28, No. 4: 1158-1181, https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2022.17152
  8. Ersoy, Y. (2020), “Green Machine Selection in a Manufacturing Company Using TOPSIS Method”, Akademia Doğa ve İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, Vol. 6, No. 1: 45-56, https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/adibd/issue/56994/814246
  9. Fazlollahtabar, H., Smailbašić, A. ve Stević, Ž. (2019), “FUCOM method in group decision-making: Selection of forklift in a warehouse”, Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, Vol. 2, No. 1: 49-65. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame1901065f
  10. Hezam, I. M., Mishra, A. R., Rani, P. ve Alshamrani, A. (2023), “Assessing the barriers of digitally sustainable transportation system for persons with disabilities using Fermatean fuzzy double normalization-based multiple aggregation method”, Applied Soft Computing, Vol. 133, 109910, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109910
  11. Ivanović, B., Saha, A., Stević, Ž., Puška, A. ve Zavadskas, E. K. (2022), “Selection of truck mixer concrete pump using novel MEREC DNMARCOS model”, Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 22, No. 4: 173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43452-022-00491-9
  12. Kaya, S. K., Ayçin, E. ve Pamucar, D. (2022)”, “Evaluation of social factors within the circular economy concept for European countries”, Central European Journal of Operations Research, Vol. 31: 73-108, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-022-00800-w
  13. Keleş, N. (2022), “Türkiye’deki 52 Havalimanının CRITIC, COCOSO ve WASPAS Yöntemleriyle Değerlendirilmesi”, (Ed. N. Altuntepe), Disiplinlerarası Yaklaşımlarla Uygulamalı Sosyal Bilimler, 225-265.
  14. Keleş, N. (2023), “Measuring performances through multiplicative functions by modifying the MEREC method: MEREC-G and MEREC-H”, International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIEOM-12-2022-0068
  15. Keleş, N. ve Pekkaya, M. (2023), “Evaluation of logistics centers in terms of sustainability via MCDM methods”, Journal of Advances in Management Research, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAMR-04-2022-0087
  16. Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, M., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. ve Antucheviciene, J. (2021), “Determination of objective weights using a new method based on the removal effects of criteria (MEREC)”, Symmetry, Vol. 13, No. 4: 525. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13040525
  17. Mahmoodi, E., Azari, M. ve Dastorani, M. T. (2023), “Comparison of different objective weighting methods in a multi‐criteria model for watershed prioritization for flood risk assessment using morphometric analysis”, Journal of Flood Risk Management, e12894. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12894
  18. Mishra, A. R., Saha, A., Rani, P., Hezam, I. M., Shrivastava, R. ve Smarandache, F. (2022), “An integrated decision support framework using single-valued-MEREC-MULTIMOORA for low carbon tourism strategy assessment”, IEEE Access, Vol. 10: 24411-24432. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3155171
  19. Pamučar, D. ve Ćirović, G. (2015), “The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC)”, Expert systems with applications, Vol. 42, No. 6: 3016-3028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.11.057
  20. Pekkaya, M. ve Keleş, N. (2021), “Determining criteria interaction and criteria priorities in freight village location selection process: the experts’ perspective in Turkey”, Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, Vol. 34, No. 7: 1348-1367, https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-05-2021-0338
  21. Průša, P., Jovčić, S., Němec, V. ve Mrázek, P. (2018), “Forklift truck selection using TOPSIS method”, IJTTE: International Journal for Traffic and Transport Engineering, Vol. 8, No: 3: 1-8, https://doi.org/10.7708/ijtte.2018.8(3).10
  22. Sarıçalı, G. ve Kundakcı, N. (2017), “Forklift alternatiflerinin KEMIRA-M yöntemi ile değerlendirilmesi”, Optimum Ekonomi ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, Vol. 4, No. 1: 35-53, https://doi.org/10.17541/optimum.285053
  23. Satıcı, S. (2023), “MEREC temelli WASPAS yöntemiyle üniversitelerin girişimci ve yenilikçi performanslarının değerlendirilmesi”, Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi, Vol. 17, No. 2: 106-128.
  24. Simić, V., Ivanović, I., Đorić, V. ve Torkayesh, A. E. (2022), “Adapting urban transport planning to the COVID-19 pandemic: an integrated Fermatean Fuzzy model”, Sustainable Cities and Society, 103669, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.103669
  25. Sönmez Çakır, F. ve Pekkaya, M. (2020), “Determination of interaction between criteria and the criteria priorities in laptop selection problem”, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 22, No. 4: 1177-1190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-020-00857-2
  26. Tuzkaya, G., Özgen, D. ve Gülsün, B. (2011), “Malzeme taşıma sistemi alternatiflerinin değerlendirilmesinde bulanık-promethee yaklaşımı”, Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, Vol. 12, No. 1: 144-155.
  27. Ulutaş, A., Stanujkic, D., Karabasevic, D., Popovic, G. ve Novaković, S. (2022), “Pallet truck selection with MEREC and WISP-S methods”, International Journal of Strategic Management and Decision Support Systems in Strategic Management, Vol. 27, No. 4:23-29, https://doi.org/10.5937/StraMan2200013U
  28. Voćkić, M., Stojić, G. ve Stević, B. (2018), “Integrated rough SWARA-ARAS model for selection of electric forklift”, In ICMNEE 2018 The 2nd International Conference on Management, Engineering and Environment, 216-227.
  29. Yu, Y., Wu, S., Yu, J., Xu, Y., Song, L. ve Xu, W. (2022), “A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making framework for offshore wind turbine selection: A case study in China”, Applied Energy, Vol. 328, 120173, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120173