Journals / Journal of Politics Economy and Management / 2023 / Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1

Analysis of Factors Participating Citizens in National Budget Processes

Pages
30–51
Publication Date
2023-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Furthermore, the findings reveal that citizen participation decreases as the proportion of the elderly within the total population increases.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Most of the empirical studies on the determinants of citizen participation in budget processes have been conducted at a local level.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The factors affecting citizen participation in national budget processes have been reviewed using the panel data method, with the data about the years 2011, 2014, 2016, and 2018 of 93 countries included in the Open Budget Survey (OBS) 2012.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, the findings reveal that citizen participation decreases as the proportion of the elderly within the total population increases.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:National Budget Process · Citizen Participation in Budget Process · Panel Data Analysis.

Abstract

Most of the empirical studies on the determinants of citizen participation in budget processes have been conducted at a local level. This study aims to empirically analyze the potential factors that determine citizen participation in national budget processes. The factors affecting citizen participation in national budget processes have been reviewed using the panel data method, with the data about the years 2011, 2014, 2016, and 2018 of 93 countries included in the Open Budget Survey (OBS) 2012. The factors affecting citizen participation have been addressed under two main titles: socio-economic and institutional-political factors. In terms of socio-economic factors, the empirical findings in the model demonstrate that citizen participation in national budget processes increases as the level of education increases. Furthermore, the findings reveal that citizen participation decreases as the proportion of the elderly within the total population increases. In terms of institutional-political factors, on the other hand, an increase in the level of budget transparency is observed to have a positive impact on citizen participation. Similarly, the analysis results indicate that the level of e-participation positively affects citizen participation in budget processes. It has been concluded that the freedom of association and assembly also has a positive impact on citizen participation in budget processes. On the other hand, the findings demonstrate that an increased level of corruption leads to decreased citizen participation in national budget processes.

Özet

Most of the empirical studies on the determinants of citizen participation in budget processes have been conducted at a local level. This study aims to empirically analyze the potential factors that determine citizen participation in national budget processes. The factors affecting citizen participation in national budget processes have been reviewed using the panel data method, with the data about the years 2011, 2014, 2016, and 2018 of 93 countries included in the Open Budget Survey (OBS) 2012. The factors affecting citizen participation have been addressed under two main titles: socio-economic and institutional-political factors. In terms of socio-economic factors, the empirical findings in the model demonstrate that citizen participation in national budget processes increases as the level of education increases. Furthermore, the findings reveal that citizen participation decreases as the proportion of the elderly within the total population increases. In terms of institutional-political factors, on the other hand, an increase in the level of budget transparency is observed to have a positive impact on citizen participation. Similarly, the analysis results indicate that the level of e-participation positively affects citizen participation in budget processes. It has been concluded that the freedom of association and assembly also has a positive impact on citizen participation in budget processes. On the other hand, the findings demonstrate that an increased level of corruption leads to decreased citizen participation in national budget processes.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNEŞ, V. (2023). Analysis of Factors Participating Citizens in National Budget Processes. Journal of Politics Economy and Management, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 30–51. https://ajindex.com/articles/952505

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Alesina, A. & Perotti, R. (1996). Fiscal discipline and the budget process, The American Economic Review, 86(2), 401–407.
  2. Asteriou, D. & Stephen, G. H. (2007). Applied Econometrics-A Modern Approach, New York: Palgrave Macmillan Bağdigen, M. & Dökmen, G. (2006). Yolsuzluğun Kamu Gelir Ve Giderleri Üzerine Etkisi, ZKÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2(3), 53-69.
  3. Baltagi, B. H. (2005).
  4. Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, England: John Wiley & Sons Company. Becker, G. S. (1993). Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education, Third Edition, London: The University of Chicago Press.
  5. Beğer, T. & Yavuzer, H. (2012).
  6. Yaşlılık ve Yaşlılık Epidemiyolojisi, Klinik Gelişim, 25, 1-3.
  7. Dikmen, S. (2019). Bütçe Gözetimi Açısından Bağımsız Mali Kurumların Bütçe Sürecindeki Rolü, Sayıştay Dergisi, 30(115), 55-81.
  8. Dikmen, S. & Çiçek, H. G. (2019). Yasama Organının Bütçe Gözetim İşlevi ve Mali Saydamlık Arasındaki İlişkinin Ekonometrik Bir Analizi, Siyasal Journal of Political Science, 28(2), 182-205.
  9. Fenwick, H. (2002).
  10. Civil Liberties and Human Rights, London: Cavendish Publishing. Gaventa, J., Barrett, G. (2012). Mapping the Outcomes of Citizen Engagement, World Development, 40(12), 2399–2410.
  11. Gerring, J., Strom, C. T. & Rodrigo, A. (2012). Democracy and Human Development Journal of Politics, 2012, 74 (01), 1–17.
  12. Goetz, A. M. & Gaventa, J. (2001). Bringing Citizen Voice and Client Focus into Service Delivery. IDS Working Paper 138, Brighton, UK: Institute of Development Studies Güriş, S. (2018). Panel Veri Modelleri, (Uygulamalı Panel Veri Ekonometrisi kitabı içinde), S. Güriş (Ed.), İstanbul:
  13. Der Yayınları.
  14. Harrison, T. M. & Sayogo, D. S. (2014).
  15. Transparency, Participation and Accountability Practices in Open Government: A Comparative Comparative Study, Government Information Quarterly 31(4), 513–525.
  16. Karagöz, K. & Karagöz, M. (2010).
  17. Yolsuzluk, Ekonomik Büyüme ve Kamu Harcamaları: Türkiye İçin Ampirik Bir Analiz, Sayıştay Dergisi, 76, 5-22.
  18. Keyifli, N. (2021). Yasama Organının Bütçe Gözetiminin Bütçe Saydamlığı Üzerindeki Etkisi: Gelişmekte Olan Ülkeler Üzerine Ampirik Bir Analiz, Sayıştay Dergisi, 32(120). Khagram, S., De Renzio, P. & Fung, A. (2013). Overview and synthesis: the political economy of fiscal transparency, participation, and accountability around the world. In S. Khagram, A. Fung & P. De Renzio (Ed.), Open budgets: the political economy of transparency, participation, and accountability (1–50). Washington: Brookings Inst