SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dicle Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 16 Sayı: 1

Effects of Sexed and Conventional Semen Use and Calf Sex on Milk Yield Parameters, Body Weight and Milk Electrical Conductivity in Holstein Cows

Holstein İneklerde Cinsiyeti Belirlenmiş ve Konvansiyonel Semen Kullanımı ve Buzağı Cinsiyetinin Süt Verim Parametreleri, Canlı Ağırlık ve Süt Elektriksel İletkenliği Üzerine Etkileri

Tahir BAYRIL
Pages
38–42
Publication Date
2023-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, heifers inseminated with sexed semen had higher maternal body weights, 100-days milk yield, milk peak yields and milk electrical conductivity levels in the first lactation than inseminated with conventional semen

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was designed to determine the effects of semen type and calf gender on milk yield parameters, milk electrical conductivity and milk flow values and postpartum maternal body weight.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 265 Holstein cows in the first lactation were used in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, heifers inseminated with sexed semen had higher maternal body weights, 100-days milk yield, milk peak yields and milk electrical conductivity levels in the first lactation than inseminated with conventional semen
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Canlı ağırlık · cinsiyeti belirlenmiş sperma · süt elektriksel iletkenlik

Abstract

This study was designed to determine the effects of semen type and calf gender on milk yield parameters, milk electrical conductivity and milk flow values and postpartum maternal body weight. A total of 265 Holstein cows in the first lactation were used in the study. The effect of sperm type on maternal body weight levels after calving and milk electrical conductivity values was significant (P0.05). Heifers inseminated with sexed semen had higher 100-days milk yield, milk peak yield and postpartum maternal body weight in the first lactation. Milk peak duration was higher in heifers inseminated with conventional semen (P0.05). In conclusion, heifers inseminated with sexed semen had higher maternal body weights, 100-days milk yield, milk peak yields and milk electrical conductivity levels in the first lactation than inseminated with conventional semen

Özet

Bu çalışma, sperma tipinin ve buzağı cinsiyetinin süt verimi parametreleri, süt iletkenlik ve akışkanlık değerleri ve doğum sonrası maternal canlı ağırlıkların üzerine etkisini belirlemek için tasarlandı. Çalışmada, birinci laktasyonda olan toplam 265 Holştayn inek kullanıldı. Sperma tipinin doğum sonrası maternal canlı ağırlık ve süt iletkenlik değerleri üzerine etkisi önemli bulundu (P0.05). Cinsiyeti belirlenmiş sperma ile tohumlanan düvelerin ilk laktasyondaki 100 günlük süt verimleri ve süt pik verimleri daha yüksekti. Pik süresi ise, konvansiyonel semen ile tohumlanan düvelerin ilk laktasyonunda daha yüksek bulundu (P0.05). Sonuç olarak, cinsiyeti belirlenmiş sperma ile tohumlanan düvelerin ilk laktasyondaki maternal canlı ağırlıkları, 100 gün süt verimleri, süt pik verimleri ve süt elektriksel iletkenlik değerleri konvansiyonel sperma ile tohumlananlardan daha yüksek olduğu tespit edildi.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAYRIL, T. (2023). Effects of Sexed and Conventional Semen Use and Calf Sex on Milk Yield Parameters, Body Weight and Milk Electrical Conductivity in Holstein Cows. Dicle Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 1, 38–42. https://ajindex.com/articles/948856

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Cottle DJ, Wallace M, Lonergan P, Fahey AG. (2018). Bioeconomics of SexedSemen Utilization in A High-Producing HolsteinFriesian Dairy Herd. J Dairy Sci. 101(5): 4498-4512
  2. Norman HD, Hutchison JL, Miller RH. (2010). Use of Sexed Semen and Its Effect on Conception Rate, Calf Sex, Dystocia, and Stillbirth of Holsteins in The United States. J Dairy Sci. 93: 3880– 3890
  3. Landete-Castillejos T, Garcia A, Lopez-Serrano FR, Gallego L. (2005). Maternal Quality and Differences in Milk Production and Composition for Male and Female Iberian Red Deer Calves (Cervus elaphus hispanicus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 57(3): 267– 74
  4. Sternlicht MD, Kouros‐Mehr H, Lu P, Werb Z. (2006). Hormonal and Local Control of Mammary Branching Morphogenesis. Differentiation. 74(7): 365-381
  5. Hinde K. (2009). Richer Milk for Sons But More Milk for Daughters: Sex‐Biased Investment during Lactation Varies with Ma‐ ternal Life History in Rhesus Macaques. Am. J Hum Biol. 21(4): 512-519
  6. Beam SW, Butler WR. (1999). Effects of Energy Balance on Follicular Development and First Ovulation in Postpartum Dairy Cows. J Reprod Fertil. 54: 411–424
  7. Samaraweera AM, Boerner V, Disnaka S, van der Werf JJ, Hermesch S. (2022). Genetic Associations between Mastitis, Milk Electrical Conductivity, and Milk Flow Rate in Temperate Dairy Cows in Tropics. Livestock Science. 264: 105064
  8. Carlstrom C, Strandberg E, Johansson K, Pettersson G, Stålham‐ mar H, Philipsson J. (2016). Genetic Associations of In-Line Recorded Milkability Traits and Udder Conformation with Udder Health. Acta Agric. Scand. 66: 84–91
  9. Norberg E. (2005). Electrical Conductivity of Milk as a Phenotypic and Genetic Indicator of Bovine Mastitis: A Review. Livestock Production Science. 96: 129–139
  10. Roche JR, Macdonald KM, Burke CR, Lee JM, Berry DP. (2007). Associations between Body Condition Score, Body Weight and Reproductive Performance in Seasonal-Calving Pasture-Based Dairy Cattle. J Dairy Sci. 90: 376–391
  11. Hristov AN, Price WJ, Shaf B. (2005). A Meta-Analysis on The Relationship between Intake of Nutrients and Body Weight with Milk Volume and Milk Protein Yield in Dairy Cows. J Dairy Sci. 88: 2860–2869
  12. Horan B, Dillon P, Faverdin P, Delaby L, Buckley F, Rath M. (2005). Strain of Holstein-Friesian by Pasture-Based Feed System Interaction for Milk Production, Bodyweight and Body Condition Score. J Dairy Sci. 88: 1231–1243
  13. Kitchen BJ. (1981). Review of The Progress of Dairy Science: Bovine Mastitis: Milk