Journals / Journal of Agricultural Production / 2023 / Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1

The Effect of Zeolite (Clinoptilolite) as a Feed Additive and Filter Material for Freshwater Aquariums

Pages
39–46
Publication Date
2023-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

When the results are evaluated from another point of view, considering the economy and ease of use, it is concluded that 2% zeolite in feed and/or 7 g/L in water can be recommended for aquatic species with high tolerance to ammonia values.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Ammonia, which occurs as a natural result of aquaculture in production facilities, has a negative effect on the quality of aquaculture water and aquatic organisms.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the study, 12 different experimental groups were organized by creating 0, 2, and 10% ratios for fish feed (G1-G3), groups that zeolite only in water (G4, G5), and combinations (zeolite and/or in water/in feed) of 0, 7, and 20 g/L amounts to water (G6-G12).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:When the results are evaluated from another point of view, considering the economy and ease of use, it is concluded that 2% zeolite in feed and/or 7 g/L in water can be recommended for aquatic species with high tolerance to ammonia values.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Feed additive · Filter material · Water parameters

Abstract

Ammonia, which occurs as a natural result of aquaculture in production facilities, has a negative effect on the quality of aquaculture water and aquatic organisms. In this study, it was aimed to determine the effect of zeolite in fish feed and in water, which has the ability to adsorb ammonium, on ammonia removal. In the study, 12 different experimental groups were organized by creating 0, 2, and 10% ratios for fish feed (G1-G3), groups that zeolite only in water (G4, G5), and combinations (zeolite and/or in water/in feed) of 0, 7, and 20 g/L amounts to water (G6-G12). When NH3 and TAN data of G1-G3 were examined, it was determined that although there was no statistical difference, it decreased proportionally with the increase in the amount of zeolite in the feed. The difference between water temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH, NH3 and TAN values in G4 and G5 groups was found to be insignificant. The dissolved oxygen, pH, NH3 and TAN values between the groups (G6-G12) were statistically different. As a result, it was determined that 10% addition of zeolite into the feed decreased the TAN values by 37%, and the addition of 10% into the feed and 20 g/L into the water decreased the TAN values by 45%. When the results are evaluated from another point of view, considering the economy and ease of use, it is concluded that 2% zeolite in feed and/or 7 g/L in water can be recommended for aquatic species with high tolerance to ammonia values.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZ, M., ARAL, O. (2023). The Effect of Zeolite (Clinoptilolite) as a Feed Additive and Filter Material for Freshwater Aquariums. Journal of Agricultural Production, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1, 39–46. https://ajindex.com/articles/948005

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Abdulathem, A. A., & Al-Rudainy, A. J. (2021). Effect of dietary zeolite on ammonia city and on some of blood parameters in common carp Cyprinus carpio. Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 52(5), 1276-1283. https://doi.org/10.36103/ijas.v52i5.1465
  2. Al Amir, M. A., Eid, A. H. S., & Ali, B. A. (2022). Effects of dietary natural zeolite (clinoptilolite) levels on water quality, growth performance and feed utilization of nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fingerlings. Journal of Animal, Poultry & Fish Production, 11(1), 65-73. https://doi.org/10.21608/japfp.2022.284101
  3. Ashrafizadeh, S. N., Khorasani, Z., & Gorjiara, M. (2008). Ammonia removal from aqueous solutions by ıranian natural zeolite. Separation Science and Technology, 43(4), 960–978. https://doi.org/10.1080/01496390701870614
  4. Berka, R. (1986). The transport of live fish a review. EIFAC Technical Paper. Bilgin, O. (2017). Technologic tests of turkey-gordes zeolite minerals. Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering, 5(5), 252-265. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmmce.2017.55021
  5. Bower, C. E., & Turner, D. T. (1982). Ammonia removal by clinoptilolite in the transport of ornamental frehswater fishes. Progressive Fish Culture, 44(1), 19-23. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8659(1982)44[19:ARBCIT]2.0.CO;2
  6. Chow C. W. K., Davey D. E., & Mulcahy D. E. (1997). An intelligent sensor system for the determination of ammonia using flow injection analysis. Laboratory Automation & Information Management, 33(1), 17-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1381-141X(97)00004-X
  7. Durborow, R. M., Crosby, D., & Brunson, M. W. (1997). Ammonia in fish ponds. SRAC Publication. Emadi, H., Nezhad, J. E., & Pourbagher, H. (2001). In vitro comparison of zeolite (clinoptilolite) and activated carbon as ammonia absorbants in fish culture. Naga, The Iclarm Quarterly, 24(1-2), 18-20.
  8. Emerson, K. R. C., Russo, R. E., & Thurston, R. V. (1975). Aqueous ammonia equilibrium calculations: Effect of pH and temperature. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 32, 2379-2383. https://doi.org/10.1139/f75-274
  9. EPA. (1999). Ambient water quality criteria for ammonia. https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=P1005JLO.txt
  10. Ghasemi, Z., Sourinejad, I., Kazemian, H., & Rohani, S. (2018). Application of zeolites in aquaculture industry: A review. Reviews in Aquaculture, 10(1), 75–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12148
  11. Ghiasi, F., & Jasour, M. S. (2012). The effects of natural zeolite (Clinoptilolte) on water quality, growth performanc