SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Quantrade Journal of Complex Systems in Social Sciences / 2023 / Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1

Paris Climate Agreement's Effect on Share Prices

Fatih KONAK
Sercan KIRIK
Pages
73–83
Publication Date
2023-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These findings led to the conclusion that, under the parameters of the anomaly under consideration, the market is not efficient in semi-strong form.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The main purpose of this study is to reveal the possible impact of the entry into force of the Paris Agreement on the stock prices of the companies in the BIST Sustainability Index (XUSRD) with the case study method.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The BIST 100 Index was used as a benchmark index, and the daily returns of 66 businesses among 67 companies traded in XUSRD were used to compute Average Abnormal Returns (AAR) and Cumulative Average Abnormal Returns (CAAR).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These findings led to the conclusion that, under the parameters of the anomaly under consideration, the market is not efficient in semi-strong form.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2021 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Paris Climate Agreement · Borsa İstanbul · Event Study

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to reveal the possible impact of the entry into force of the Paris Agreement on the stock prices of the companies in the BIST Sustainability Index (XUSRD) with the case study method. The BIST 100 Index was used as a benchmark index, and the daily returns of 66 businesses among 67 companies traded in XUSRD were used to compute Average Abnormal Returns (AAR) and Cumulative Average Abnormal Returns (CAAR). Within the scope of the applied methodology, while determining the event window of -20 days +20 days based on the date of the event, 10.11.2021, 250 was taken into account as the estimation period. The Paris Agreement's implementation has an impact on the stock returns of the firms in XUSRD, it has been found based on the findings gathered. The presence of a predicted trend, however, could not be classified as either positive or negative. These findings led to the conclusion that, under the parameters of the anomaly under consideration, the market is not efficient in semi-strong form.

🔖

Cite This Article

KONAK, F., KIRIK, S. (2023). Paris Climate Agreement's Effect on Share Prices. Quantrade Journal of Complex Systems in Social Sciences, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 73–83. https://ajindex.com/articles/946553

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Adaiem, N. & Dayı, F. (2022). Financial Risk Analysis in Renewable Energy Companies. Quantrade Journal of Complex Systems in Social Sciences, 4 (2), 44-50.
  2. Aytekin, A. & Aygün, M. (2016). Finansta Yeni Bir Alan “Davranışsal Finans”, Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, (2), 143-156.
  3. Bayraktar, A. (2012).
  4. Etkin Piyasalar Hipotezi, Aksaray Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 4 (1), 37-47.
  5. Becchetti, L., Ciciretti, R., Hasan, I. & Kobeissi, N. (2012). Corporate Social Responsibility and Shareholder’s Value, Journal of Business Research, 65 (2012), 1628-1635.
  6. Berthelot, S., Coulmont, M. & Serret, V. (2012). Do Investors Value Sustainable Reports? A Canadian Study, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environment Management, 19 (6), 355-363.
  7. Büyükşalvarcı, A. & Abdioğlu, H. (2012). Kurumsal Yönetim Uygulamalarının Hisse Senedi Getirileri Üzerine Etkisi: İMKB Şirketleri Üzerine Ampirik Bir Uygulama, World of Accounting Science, 14 (1), 19-42.
  8. Consolandi, C., Jaiswal-Dale, A., Poggiani, E. & Vercelli, A. (2009). Global Standards and Ethical Stock Indexes: The Case of the Dow Jones Sustainability Stoxx Index, Journal of Business Ethics, 87 (1), 185-197.
  9. Çıtak, L. & Ersoy, E. (2016). Firmaların BIST Sürdürülebilirlik Endeksine Alınmasına Yatırımcı Tepkisi: Olay Çalışması ve Ortalama Testleri ile Bir Analiz, Uluslararası Alanya İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 8 (1), 43-57.
  10. Dasgupta, S., Laplante, B. & Mamingi, N. (1998). Capital Market Responses to Environmental Performance in Developing Countries, Washington: The World Bank Research Group. Daszynska-Zygadlo, K., Ryszawska, B., Slonski, T. & Zawadzki, B. M. (2014). Investors’ Reactions for Sustainability Index Inclusion- Is CSR a Good News?, Acta Universitatis Lodziensis Folia Oeconomica, 2 (300), 45-60.
  11. Duranay, S. & Göçmen Yağcılar, G. (2020). Borsa İstanbul’da Sosyal Sorumlu Fiyatlama: Sürdürülebilirlik Endeksi Üzerine Bir Olay Çalışması, Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 6 (3), 903-917.
  12. Estrada, J. (2001).
  13. Law and Behavioral Economics, Latin American Law and Economics Association, 1-16.
  14. Eyüboğlu, K. (2011). Kurumsal Yönetimin Hisse Senedi Getirileri Üzerindeki Etkisi: İMKB Kurumsal Yönetim Endeksindeki Şirketler Açısından Bir Değerlendirme, Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 1, 55-69.
  15. Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work, The Journal of Finance, (25), 383-417.
  16. Kaderli, Y. (2007). Yapılan İh