Journals / SAVSAD Savunma ve Savaş Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 33 Sayı: 1

THE USE OF ROBOTS IN PUBLIC SAFETY: A SPATIAL TAXONOMY

ROBOTLARIN KAMU GÜVENLİĞİNDE KULLANIMI: MEKÂNSAL BİR SINIFLANDIRMA

Pages
145–176
Publication Date
2023-06-21
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The diversification of the debates in association with the spatial and the fact that fully autonomous robots herald major changes in public policies bring the 'spatiality of autonomy' approach with it.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to constitute an analytical framework to comprehend the effects of robot technology on public safety in the spatial context of the 21st century.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Afterward, the problematic areas in which the discussions are concentrated on the use of robots in public safety have been made meaningful and clear.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The diversification of the debates in association with the spatial and the fact that fully autonomous robots herald major changes in public policies bring the 'spatiality of autonomy' approach with it.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Robot · Otonomi · Teknoloji

Abstract

The aim of this study is to constitute an analytical framework to comprehend the effects of robot technology on public safety in the spatial context of the 21st century. Beyond examining the superhuman abilities achieved through technological developments, in this analysis, an effort has been made to evaluate the effects of the usage of robots on public policy actors with multiple streams theory in a balanced discussion. In the study, the research question has been ‘Is the discussion of the legitimacy of robot technology in public safety affected by space?’. The scope of the role of autonomy in public safety, the responsibilities of robots towards people in the same ecosystem and their effects on human rights, the spatial differences of robot usage, and anti-robot debates. The legal, ethical, and social implications of using fully autonomous and semi-autonomous robots have been discussed in this context. Afterward, the problematic areas in which the discussions are concentrated on the use of robots in public safety have been made meaningful and clear. The diversification of the debates in association with the spatial and the fact that fully autonomous robots herald major changes in public policies bring the 'spatiality of autonomy' approach with it.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, robot teknolojisinin 21. Yüzyıl’da mekânsal bağlamda kamu güvenliğine etkilerini anlamak üzere analitik bir çerçeve oluşturmaktır. Teknolojik gelişmelerle erişilen insan üstü yeteneklerin incelenmesinin ötesinde, bu analizde robotların kullanımının kamu politikası aktörlerine etkilerinin çoklu akımlar kuramı ile dengeli bir tartışma içerisinde değerlendirilmesine gayret gösterilmiştir. Çalışmada ‘kamu güvenliğinde robot teknolojisinin meşruiyeti tartışmaları mekândan etkilenmekte midir?’ sorusu araştırılmıştır. Otonominin kamu güvenliğindeki rolünün kapsamını, robotların aynı ekosistemdeki insanların sorumlulukları ile insan haklarına etkileri, robot kullanımının mekânsal farklılıkları ile robot karşıtı tartışmalar oluşturmaktadır. Bu minvalde, tam-otonom ve yarı-otonom robot kullanımının yasal, etik ve toplumsal etkileri tartışılmıştır. Sonrasında robotların kamu güvenliğinde kullanımında tartışmaların yoğunlaştığı sorunlu alanlar anlamlı ve açık bir hale getirilmiştir. Tartışmaların mekâna göre farklılaşması ve tam-otonom robotların kamu politikalarında büyük değişimlerin habercisi olması ‘otonominin mekânsallığı’ yaklaşımını beraberinde getirmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

EKMEKCİOĞLU, A. (2023). THE USE OF ROBOTS IN PUBLIC SAFETY: A SPATIAL TAXONOMY. SAVSAD Savunma ve Savaş Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 33 Sayı: 1, 145–176. https://ajindex.com/articles/945140

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Ahmed, H. M. ve Essa, H. S. (2021). Survey of an intelligent surveillance system for monitoring international border security, 1-9. Materials Today: Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.05.550
  2. Anderson, K. ve Waxman, M. C. (2013). Law and ethics for autonomous weapon systems: Why a ban won't work and how the laws of war can. Jean Perkins Task Force on National Security and Law Essay Series, Hoover Institution and Stanford University. Antebi, L. (2013). Who Will Stop the Robots? Military and Strategic Affairs, 5(2), 61-77.
  3. Arkin, R. C. ve Moshkina, L. (2007, 1-2 June 2007). Lethality and Autonomous Robots: An Ethical Stance. The 2007 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society sempozyumunda sunulmuştur. Arntz, M., Gregory, T. ve Zierahn, U. (2016). The Risk of Automation for Jobs in OECD Countries. doi:https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlz9h56dvq7-en
  4. Asaro, P. (2016). "Hands up, don't shoot!" HRI and the automation of police use of force. Journal of human-robot interaction, 5(3), 55-69.
  5. Ashrafian, H. (2015). AIonAI: A Humanitarian Law of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21(1), 29-40. doi:10.1007/s11948-013-9513-9
  6. Asimov, I. (1950). The evitable conflict. Astounding Science Fiction, 45(4), 48-68.
  7. Bigo, D. (2014). The (in) securitization practices of the three universes of EU border control: Military/Navy–border guards/police–database analysts. Security Dialogue, 45(3), 209-225.
  8. Brollowski, H. (2013). Military robots and the principle of humanity: Distorting the human face of the law? M. Matthee, B. Toebes ve M. Brus (Eds.), Armed Conflict and International Law: In Search of the Human Face: Liber Amicorum in Memory of Avril McDonald (s. 53-96).
  9. The Hague, The Netherlands: T.M.C. Asser Press.
  10. Calcara, A. (2022). Contractors or robots? Future warfare between privatization and automation. Small Wars ve Insurgencies, 33(1-2), 250-271.
  11. Champbell, C. (2016). China has launched the robocops you have been waiting for. Time. https://time.com/4307492/china-public-security-anbot-dalek-robot-robocop/ adresinden alınmıştır. Chen, B., Marvin, S. ve While, A. (2020). Containing COVID-19 in China: AI and the robotic restructuring of future cities. Dialogues in Human Geography, 10(2), 238-241. doi:10.1177/2043820620934267 Chui, M., Manyika, J. ve Miremadi, M. (2016, 08.07.2016). Where machines could replace humans-and where they can’t (yet). https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/where-machines-c