SavedAdd your journal

Journals / European Oral Research / 2023 / Cilt: 57 Sayı: 2

Pathway to mercury-free dentistry: an insight into past, present, and future

Pooja DUDEJA
Krishan DUDEJA
Shibani GROVER
Harpreet SINGH
Zohra JABİN
Pages
60–67
Publication Date
2023-05-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion The real challenge is to find a suitable amalgam substitute and to follow the mercury hygiene measures closely.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose The popularity of dental amalgam arises from its excellent long-term performance, ease of use, and low cost.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results Around 40 articles, highlighting mercury exposure among dental professionals and patients were included.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion The real challenge is to find a suitable amalgam substitute and to follow the mercury hygiene measures closely.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Amalgam · Mercury toxicity · Minamata Convention

Abstract

Purpose The popularity of dental amalgam arises from its excellent long-term performance, ease of use, and low cost. However, there is a concern about the potential adverse health effects arising from exposure to mercury in amalgam. This review article critically discusses the safety of dental amalgam as a restorative material and our preparedness for a mercury-free road ahead. Materials and Methods A database search was performed on PubMed and Google scholar using the keywords: “mercury-free dentistry”, “mercury toxicity”, “amalgam substitutes”, “amalgam mercury toxicity”. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were specified clearly. Relevant literature was also searched in the dental textbooks. Results Around 40 articles, highlighting mercury exposure among dental professionals and patients were included. Despite the overwhelming body of scientific evidence demonstrating amalgam to be a safe restorative material, concerns about the toxic effects of mercury persist. Conclusion The real challenge is to find a suitable amalgam substitute and to follow the mercury hygiene measures closely.

🔖

Cite This Article

DUDEJA, P., DUDEJA, K., GROVER, S., SINGH, H., JABİN, Z. (2023). Pathway to mercury-free dentistry: an insight into past, present, and future. European Oral Research, Cilt: 57 Sayı: 2, 60–67. https://ajindex.com/articles/945135

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Phillips RW, Skinner EW. Skinner’s science of dental materials. 11th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1991, p. 496
  2. Dental amalgam: update on safety concerns. ADA council on Scientific Affairs. J Am Dent Assoc.1998;129(4):494-503. doi:10.14219/jada.archive.1998.0252 3. U.S. Public Health Service, Committee to Coordinate Environmental Health and Related Programs. Dental amalgam: A scientific review and recommended public health service strategy for research, education and regulation (Final report of the Subcommittee on Risk Management. Washington, D.C.:U.S. Government Printing Office, 1993; PHS publication no. 342-322/60025)
  3. Sturdevant. Biomaterials. In: Roberson TM, Heymann HO, Swift EJ, editors. Art and Science of Operative Dentistry. 5th ed., India: Mosby; Reed Elsevier India Pvt. Ltd.; 2006, p. 135-242
  4. Mahalaxmi S. Dental Amalgam. In: Mahalaxmi S, editor. Materials Used in Dentistry. 1st ed., India: Wolters Kluwer Health (India); 2013, p. 195-221
  5. Hyson JM Jr. Amalgam: Its history and perils. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2006 Mar;34(3):215-29. PMID: 16895078
  6. Tuthill, JY. “Mercurial necrosis resulting from amalgam fillings.” The Brooklyn Medical Journal. 1898; XII:725-742
  7. Talbot ES. The chemistry and physiological action of mercury as used in amalgam fillings. The Ohio State J. Dent. Sci. 1882;2(1):1-12
  8. Dodes JE. The amalgam controversy. An evidence-based analysis. J Am Dent Assoc. 2001 Mar;132(3):348-56
  9. Soni R, Bhatnagar A, Vivek R, Singh R, Chaturvedi TP, Singh A. A systematic review on mercury toxicity from dental amalgam fillings and its management strategies. J. Sci Res 2012;56:81-92
  10. Fawer RF, de Ribaupierre Y, Guillemin MP, Berode M, Lob M. Measurement of hand tremor induced by industrial exposure to metallic mercury. Br J Ind Med. 1983 May;40(2):204-8
  11. Mackert JR Jr, Berglund A. Mercury exposure from dental amalgam fillings: absorbed dose and the potential for adverse health effects. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1997;8(4):410-36
  12. Bernhoft RA. Mercury toxicity and treatment: a review of the literature. J Environ Public Health. 2012;2012:460508. doi: 10.1155/2012/460508. Epub 2011 Dec 22
  13. Decharat S, Phethuayluk P, Maneelok S, Thepaksorn P. Determination of Mercury Exposure among Dental Health Workers in Nakhon Si Thammarat Province, Thailand. J Toxicol. 2014;2014:401012. doi:10.1155/2014/401012 15. Langworth S, Sällsten G, Barregård L, Cynkier I, Lind ML, Söderman E. Exposure to mercury vapor and impact on health in