Journals / Textile and Apparel / 2019 / Cilt: 29 Sayı: 4

SUPPLIER SELECTION UNDER FUZZY ENVIRONMENT

Pages
344–352
Publication Date
2019-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the proposed method fuzzy Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), a closeness coefficient is calculated for obtaining supplier performance rankings.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:To select the right supplier in supply chain is of great importance in terms of firms.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Supplier selection is so difficult and critical process that it requires to evaluate many factors such as quality, delivery time, cost, technology, payment due, flexibility and corporate reputation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the proposed method fuzzy Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), a closeness coefficient is calculated for obtaining supplier performance rankings.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Supplier Selection · Supply Chain · Fuzzy TOPSIS Method

Abstract

To select the right supplier in supply chain is of great importance in terms of firms. Because, when the supplier is a piece of a well-organized supply chain, this relationship may affect the competition power across the entire supply chain. Supplier selection is so difficult and critical process that it requires to evaluate many factors such as quality, delivery time, cost, technology, payment due, flexibility and corporate reputation. Decision makers must consider these factors to select ideal suppliers. At this point, multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods help decision makers to solve supplier selection problems. In this paper, considering the fuzziness in group decision making process, fuzzy set theory is used to deal with supplier selection problem of a textile manufacturing firm in Denizli. The ratings and weights of the criteria are expressed by linguistic variables. According to the proposed method fuzzy Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), a closeness coefficient is calculated for obtaining supplier performance rankings.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNDÜZ, Ç., GÜNDÜZ, G. Ş. (2019). SUPPLIER SELECTION UNDER FUZZY ENVIRONMENT. Textile and Apparel, Cilt: 29 Sayı: 4, 344–352. https://ajindex.com/articles/943520

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Ghodsypur, S. H., & O’Brien, C., 1998, “A decision support system for supplier selection using an integrated analytic hierarchy process and linear programming”, International Journal of Production Economics, 56-57, 199-212
  2. Shin, H., Collier, D. A., & Wilson, D. D., 2000, “Supply management orientation and supplier/buyer performance”, Journal of Operations Management, 18, 317–333
  3. Chen, Y. J., 2011, “Structured Methodology for Supp¬lier Selection and Evaluation in a Supply Chain”, Information Sciences, 181 (9), 1651-1670
  4. Ding, H., Benyoucef, L., & Xie, X, 2005, “A Simulation Optimization Methodology for Supplier Selection Problem”, International Journal of Computer Integ¬rated Manufacturing, 18 (2-3), 210-224
  5. Monczka, R., Trent, R., & Handfield, R., 1998, “Purchasing and Supply Chain Management”, South-Western College Publishing, New York
  6. Sarkis, J., & Talluri, S, 2002, “A Model for Strategic Supplier Selection”, Journal of Supply Chain Mana¬gement, 38 (1), 18-28
  7. Ho, W., Xu, X., & Dey, P. K., 2010, “Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review”, European journal of Operational Research, 202 (1), 16-24
  8. De Boer, L., Labro, E., & Morlacchi, P., 2001, “A Review of Methods Supporting Supplier Selection”, Europe¬an Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 7 (2), 75-89
  9. Chen, C-T., Lin, C-T., & Huang, S-F., 2006, “A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management”, International Journal of Production Economics, 102 (2), 289-301
  10. Chen S. J., & Hwang C. L., 1992, “Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications” Springer-Verlag, Berlin
  11. Delgado, M., Verdegay, J. L., & Vila, M. A., 1992, “Linguistic decision-making models”, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 7, 479–492
  12. Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K., 1981, “Multiple attribute decision making, methods and applications:186 (Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems)”, Springer-Verlag, New York
  13. Herrera, F., & Herrera-Viedma, E., 2000, “Linguistic decision analysis: Steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 115, 67-82
  14. Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Verdegay, J. L., 1996, “A model of consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessments”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 78, 73-87
  15. Chen, C. T., 2000, “Extensions of the TOPSIS for Gro¬up Decision Making Under Fuzzy Environment”, Fuzzy Se