Journals / Textile and Apparel / 2021 / Cilt: 31 Sayı: 1

Green Synthesis of Cellulosic Nanofiber in Enset Woven Fabric Structures via Enzyme Treatment and Mechanical Hammering

Pages
63–72
Publication Date
2021-03-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The SEM microscopic image also confirmed the formation of the enset nano fibers ranges from 63-650 nm.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The rapid development of technology in textile industries has been improving textile finishing properties such as durability, water replants and breathability.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The test results revealed that nano fiber fabrication was significantly affected by used enzyme concentration and applied mechanical power.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The SEM microscopic image also confirmed the formation of the enset nano fibers ranges from 63-650 nm.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Amylase Enzyme · Cellulose · Enset Nanofiber

Abstract

The rapid development of technology in textile industries has been improving textile finishing properties such as durability, water replants and breathability. Enset is effectively un-utilized agro-waste fiber composed of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin, which are resemblance to banana fibers. This paper was focused on the utilization of enset waste materials for the production of nano fiber. Enset nano fiber (ENF) was fabricated by defibrillation of raw fibers from the surface of enset woven fabrics into micro and nano-scale fibers by -amylase enzyme treatment and mechanical hammering. Instead of sandwiching the nanofiber mats between conventional woven fabrics, in this research work, nanofiber mats were manufactured on the surface of the conventional woven fabrics. This top-down nanofabrication approach is simple, cost-effective and environmentally friendly manufacturing technique of nanofiber woven fabric structures. Fiber characterization was done by Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) and Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). The surface area, pore size and pore volume of enset nano fiber was analyzed by Brunauer, Emmett and Teller (BET). The test results revealed that nano fiber fabrication was significantly affected by used enzyme concentration and applied mechanical power. Enset micro fiber was formed when 10 % (w/v) concentration of α-amylase enzymatic treatment was applied while enset nano fibers were formed when the enzyme concentration was increased to 15% - 20 % ( w/v). The FTIR results revealed that hemicellulose and lignin were effectively removed and fine fibers were defibrillated from the crystal structure of enset woven fabrics. The SEM microscopic image also confirmed the formation of the enset nano fibers ranges from 63-650 nm.

🔖

Cite This Article

TEMESGEN, A. G., EREN, R., AYKUT, Y. (2021). Green Synthesis of Cellulosic Nanofiber in Enset Woven Fabric Structures via Enzyme Treatment and Mechanical Hammering. Textile and Apparel, Cilt: 31 Sayı: 1, 63–72. https://ajindex.com/articles/943476

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Chen G., Li Y., Bick M. and Chen J. 2020. Smart textiles for electricity generation, Chem. Rev.120(8), 3668–3720.
  2. Rather L.J., Zhou Q., Ganie S.A. and Li Q. 2020. Environmental Profile of Nano-finished Textile Materials: Implications on Public Health, Risk Assessment, and Public Perception. Advances in Functional Finishing of Textiles, Springer, Singapore, 57–83.
  3. Khan I., Saeed K. and Khan I. 2019. Nanoparticles: Properties, applications and toxicities. Arab. J. Chem.12(7), 908–931.
  4. Chen L., Liu J., Jiang C., Zhao K., Chen H., Shi X., Chen L., Sun C., Zhang S., Wang Y. and Zhang Z. 2019. Nanoscale Behavior and Manipulation of the Phase Transition in Single‐Crystal Cu2Se. Adv. Mater. 31(4), 1804919. Fan P., Zhong M., Bai B., Jin G. and Zhang H. 2016. Large scale and cost effective generation of 3D self-supporting oxide nanowire architectures by a top-down and bottom-up combined approach. RSC Adv., 6(51), 45923–45930.
  5. Kargarzadeh H., Mariano M., Gopakumar D., Ahmad I., Thomas S., Dufresne A., Huang J. and Lin N. 2018. Advances in cellulose nanomaterials. Cellulose 25(4), 2151–2189.
  6. Jiang J., Qin N. and Tao T.H. 2020. Nanomanufacturing of biopolymers using electron and ion beams. J. Micromechanics Microengineering 30(3), 033001. Lazić B.D., Pejić B.M., Kramar A.D., Vukčević M.M., Mihajlovski K.R., Rusmirović J.D. and Kostić M.M. 2018. Influence of hemicelluloses and lignin content on structure and sorption properties of flax fibers (Linum usitatissimum L.). Cellulose 25(1), 697-709.
  7. Wang X., Zhang K., Zhu M., Hsiao B.S. and Chu B. 2018. Enhanced mechanical performance of self‐bundled electrospun fiber yarns via post‐treatments. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 29(10),826–831.
  8. Phan D.N., Lee H., Huang B., Mukai Y. and Kim I.S. 2019. Fabrication of electrospun chitosan/cellulose nanofibers having adsorption property with enhanced mechanical property. Cellulose 26(3), 1781–1793.
  9. Phan D.N., Lee H., Huang B., Mukai Y. and Kim I.S. 2016. Fabric Parameter Effect on the Mechanical Properties of Woven Hemp Fabric Reinforced Composites as an Alternative to Wood Products. Adv Res Text Eng 1(1), 1004–1012.
  10. Borrell.S., Biswas M.K., Goodwin M., Blomme, G., Schwarzacher T., Wendawek A.M., Berhanu A., Kallow S. 2019. The poorly known Ethiopian crop Enset. Ann. Bot. 123(5), 747–766.
  11. Mangesh D. Teli T., Jelalu M. 2017.
  12. Chemical, Physical and Thermal Characterization of Ensete ventricosum Plant Fibre. IRJET 04(12),1013–1020.
  13. Luo S., Lenon G.B., Gill H., Hung A., Dias D.A 2020. Inhibitor