Journals / Akademik Hassasiyetler / 2014 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1

The Effects Of Internal And External Dynamıcs At The Transıtıon To Multı-Party Democracy In Turkey

Türkiye’de Çok Partili Demokrasiye Geçişte İç Ve Dış Dinamiklerin Etkileri

Pages
1–21
Publication Date
2014-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a matter of fact, the reviewing well of these circuits is important for both the present and future of Turkey’s domestic politics and the understanding of general change of course

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Öz Though Turkey has managed to remain neutral by not joining the Second World War, She has deeply affected from this war.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For a long time, altough The Republic of Turkey which governed with single party political system lived some experiences with the purpose of transition to multi-party system until 1945, could not be the desired result from this initiatives.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a matter of fact, the reviewing well of these circuits is important for both the present and future of Turkey’s domestic politics and the understanding of general change of course
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anahtar Kelimeler Second World War · 1945-1950 Years · The History of Turkish Democracy

Özet

Öz Though Turkey has managed to remain neutral by not joining the Second World War, She has deeply affected from this war. Both during the war and after the war, the failed economic policies which applied and the harsh measures which taken in the period of governments of one-party rulership have been causing discontent and responses against the government in a large segment of the society. For a long time, altough The Republic of Turkey which governed with single party political system lived some experiences with the purpose of transition to multi-party system until 1945, could not be the desired result from this initiatives. After 1945, as a result of both domestic and external dynamics was carried out transition to a multiparty system and its permanence is provided in Turkey. If 1908-1911 circuit is left to one side, perhaps, no circuit of Turkish history was not to testify a visible political activity as well as between 1945-1950. For the Turkish democracy, in a way, We can accept the period 19451950 as the struggle of establishing a democracy of this nation’s pertinent to their needs and culture by blending their experiences and aspirations which comes from their history and democratic traditions with the philosophy and way of action of Western democracies. As a matter of fact, the reviewing well of these circuits is important for both the present and future of Turkey’s domestic politics and the understanding of general change of course

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAKMAK, M. A., ADALAR, H. (2014). The Effects Of Internal And External Dynamıcs At The Transıtıon To Multı-Party Democracy In Turkey. Akademik Hassasiyetler, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1, 1–21. https://ajindex.com/articles/94260

References (28)

  1. ACAR, Ayla, Soğuk Savaş Yıllarında Amerikan Kültürünün Türkiye’ye Girişinde Basının Rolü (1945-1960),
  2. Marmara Üniversitesi,
  3. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İletişim Ana Bilim Dalı, Genel Gazetecilik Bilim Dalı, Doktora Tezi, İstanbul, 2008.
  4. AKALIN Cüneyt, Soğuk Savaş ABD ve Türkiye-1, 1. Baskı,
  5. İstanbul, Kaynak Yayınları, 2003.
  6. ARMAOGLU, F., 20.Yüzyıl Tarihi(1914-80),
  7. Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, Ankara, 1984.
  8. AVCIOĞLU, Doğan, Türkiye’nin Düzeni,1. Kitap, İstanbul, Tekin Yayınevi, 1975.
  9. BORATAV, K., Türkiye Tarihi-Çağdaş Türkiye(1908-1980) içinde İktisat Tarihi, Der. Sina AKŞİN, Cem Yayınevi, İstanbul, 2002.
  10. BÜYÜKKALAY, Betül, Türkiye’de Çok Partili Siyasal Hayata Geçişin Nedenleri, Akdeniz Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Uluslar Arası İlişkiler Ana Bilim Dalı, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Antalya, 2011.
  11. ÇAKIR, Arif, Marshall Planı Nedir, Türkiye’ye Ne Sağlayacaktır?, Türkiye İktisat Mecmuası, Haziran 1949, Sayı:7. ÇALIŞ, Şaban, DAĞI, İhsan, GÖZEN, Ramazan, Türkiye’nin Dış Politika Gündemi, Kimlik Demokrasi, Güvenlik, Liberte Yayınları,2001.
  12. ÇAVDAR, T., Türkiye’nin Demokrasi Tarihi(1839-1950),
  13. İmge Yayınevi, İstanbul, 1995. _____________, “Demokrat Parti”, Cumhuriyet Dönemi Türkiye Ansiklopedisi, C:8 İstanbul, 1985.
  14. EKİNCİ, N., Türkiye’de Çok Partili Düzene Geçişte Dış Etkenler, Toplumsal Dönüşüm Yayınları, İstanbul, 1997.
  15. GÜRKAN, Nilgün, Türkiye’de Demokrasiye Geçişte Basın 1945-1950,
  16. İstanbul, İletişim Yayınları, 1998.
  17. HARPER and Brothers, Documents on American Foreign Relations, Published for the Council on Foreign Relations, NewYork, 1948.
  18. KARPAT, K.H., Türk Demokrasi Tarihi (Sosyal, Ekonomik, Kültürel Temeller), Timaş Yayınları, İstanbul, 2013.
  19. KİRMAN Emin, Çok Partili Döneme Geçiş Süreci ve Türk Siyasal Kültüründe Muhalefet Olgusunun Gelişimi (1946-1950),
  20. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Kamu Yönetimi, Ana Bilim Dalı, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Isparta, 2006.
  21. KOÇAK, Cemil, Türkiye’de Milli Şef Dönemi(1938-1945), Cilt 2, İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul, 2009. _____________Türkiye’de Milli Sef Dönemi 1938-1945, letisim Yayınları, kinci Cilt, İstanbul, 1996b.
  22. LEWIS, B., Modern Türkiye’nin Doğuşu, Çev: M. KIRATLI., Türk Tarih Kurumu Yayınları, Ankara, 2000.
  23. MARDİN, Ş., Türk Modernleşmesi (Makaleler 4), İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul, 1992.
  24. OKTAY, Ahmet, Türkiye’de Popüler Kültür, 5.Baskı,
  25. İstanbul, Everest Yayınları, 2002.
  26. SANDER, Oral, Türk Amerikan İlişkileri 1947-1964, Ankara, 1979,
  27. SBF, Yayınları,
  28. Sevinç Matbaası. SENCER, Muzaffer, Türk