Journals / Sakarya University Journal of Science / 2018 / Cilt: 22 Sayı: 5

Numerical Analysis of Flow Around Bluff Bodies with 4th and 2nd order compact formulations

Pages
1234–1252
Publication Date
2018-10-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Furthermore, in the flow field for considered benchmark problem, separation bubble length that consisted in the wake region is increased proportionally depending on the alteration of the Reynolds Number values.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the present study, fourth-order compact formulation has been improved for Navier-Stokes (N-S) equations, which is expressed for two-dimensional, steady, incompressible flow problems.
📊
Key Findings & Data:N-S equation system has been expressed with Stream Function-Vorticity Approach using Finite Difference Method (FDM) from the numerical methods.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, in the flow field for considered benchmark problem, separation bubble length that consisted in the wake region is increased proportionally depending on the alteration of the Reynolds Number values.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Akım Fonsiyonu-Vortisite Formülasyonu · Küt Cisim Etrafındaki Akış · Daimi Akış

Abstract

In the present study, fourth-order compact formulation has been improved for Navier-Stokes (N-S) equations, which is expressed for two-dimensional, steady, incompressible flow problems. N-S equation system has been expressed with Stream Function-Vorticity Approach using Finite Difference Method (FDM) from the numerical methods. In order to test the functionality and applicability of the improved numerical formulation, a sample for submerged bluff bodies, flow problem around cylinder with square cross-section was chosen as a benchmark problem. As a result of applying improved numerical formulation with Gauss-Seidel Relaxation Method was used for this benchmark problem. The benchmark problem was also solved with second-order accuracy and obtained numerical results were compared with fourth-order accuracy numerical results. With the same Reynolds Number and the same free-stream velocity values, fourth-order numerical results are more convergent than second-order numerical results. Furthermore, in the flow field for considered benchmark problem, separation bubble length that consisted in the wake region is increased proportionally depending on the alteration of the Reynolds Number values.

🔖

Cite This Article

ASLAN, E., İNAN, İ., KANDEMİR, İ., GÜVEN, H. R. (2018). Numerical Analysis of Flow Around Bluff Bodies with 4th and 2nd order compact formulations. Sakarya University Journal of Science, Cilt: 22 Sayı: 5, 1234–1252. https://ajindex.com/articles/942134

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Referans1 S. C. Chapra and R. P. Canale “Numerical Methods for Engineers”, 6th edition, McGraw-Hill, Boston, 2010. Referans2 Y. Cengel and J. M. Cimbala, “Fluid Mechanics Fundamentals and Applications (In SI Units)”, McGraw-Hill, Boston, 2006. Referans3 I. Karagoz, “Sayısal Analiz ve Mühendislik Uygulamaları”, 4. Basım, Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık, 2011. Referans4 T. Breuer, J. Bernsdorf, F. Durst, “Accurate computations of the laminar flow past a square cylinder based on two different methods: Lattice-Boltzmann and Finite-Volume”, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 186-196, 2000. Referans5 M. Ozgoren, “Flow structure in downstream of square and circular cylinders”, Flow Meas. Inst., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 225-235, 2006. Referans6 C. A. J. Fletcher, “Computational Techniques for Fluid Dynamics I”, Second Edition,
  2. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1991. Referans7 C. H. K. Williamson, “Vortex dynamics in the cylinder wake”, Ann. Review Fluid Mech., vol.28, pp. 477-539, 1996. Referans8 M. M. Zdravkovich, “Flow around Circular Cylinders, vol. 1: Fundamentals”, Oxford University Press, New York, 1997. Referans9 A. C. Benim, E. Pasqualotto, S. H. Suh, “Modelling Turbulent Flow Past a Circular Cylinder by RANS, URANS, LES and DES”, Prog. Compt. Fluid Dynamics, vol. 8, pp. 299-307, 2008. Referans10 R. W. Davis, E.F. Moore, “A numerical study of vortex shedding from rectangles”, J. Fluid Mech., vol. 116, pp. 475-506, 1982. Referans11 A. Okajima, “Strouhal numbers of rectangular cylinders”, J. Fluid Mech., vol. 123, pp. 379-398, 1982. Referans12 A. Okajima, “Numerical simulation of flow around rectangular cylinders”, J. Wind Eng. Indust. Aerodynamics, vol. 33, no. 1-2, pp. 171-180, 1990. Referans13 R. W. Davis, E. F. Moore, L. P. Purtell, “A numerical-experimental study of confined flow around rectangular cylinders”, Phys. Fluids, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 46-59, 1984. Referans14 R. Franke, W. Rodi, B. Schönung, “Numerical calculation of laminar vortex shedding past cylinders”, J. Wind Eng. Indust. Aerodynamics, vol. 35, pp. 237-257, 1990. Referans15 K. M. Klekar, S.V. Patankar, “Numerical prediction of vortex shedding behind square cylinders”, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 327-341, 1992. Referans16 A. Mukhopadhyay, G. Biswas, T. Sundararajan, “Numerical investigation of confined wakes behind a square cylinder in a channel”, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 1473-1484, 1992. Referans17 A. Sohankar, C. Norberg, L. Davidson, “Numerical Sim