SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kastamonu Education Journal / 2010 / Cilt: 18 Sayı: 2

PROFILE ANALYSIS OF STUDENT TEACHERS’ CURRICULUM BELIEFS

ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ PROGRAM İNANÇLARININ GÖRÜNÜM ANALİZİ

Altay EREN
Pages
379–388
Publication Date
2010-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Findings also demonstrated that the relationships among student teachers’ curriculum beliefs are positive and moderate, and these beliefs could be defined in two distinct clusters, entitled High Level Curriculum Beliefs and Low Level Curriculum Beliefs.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to examine the profiles of student teachers’ curriculum beliefs.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 647 student teachers participated in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Findings also demonstrated that the relationships among student teachers’ curriculum beliefs are positive and moderate, and these beliefs could be defined in two distinct clusters, entitled High Level Curriculum Beliefs and Low Level Curriculum Beliefs.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Program inançları · öğretmen adayları · öğretmen eğitimi

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the profiles of student teachers’ curriculum beliefs. A total of 647 student teachers participated in the study. Participants’ curriculum beliefs were assessed by the Curriculum Orientation Inventory. Both correlation and cluster analyses were used in the data analysis. Findings of the study showed that student teachers’ curriculum beliefs could be investigated through academic, cognitive processes, social-reconstructionist, humanistic, and technological factors. Findings also demonstrated that the relationships among student teachers’ curriculum beliefs are positive and moderate, and these beliefs could be defined in two distinct clusters, entitled High Level Curriculum Beliefs and Low Level Curriculum Beliefs.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, öğretmen adaylarının program inançlarına ilişkin görünümlerin incelenmesidir. Çalışmaya 647 öğretmen adayı katılmıştır. Katılımcıların program inançlarına yönelik veriler Program Yönelimleri Envanteri aracılığıyla elde edilmiştir. Verilerin çözümlenmesinde hem korelasyon hem de küme analizleri kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın bulguları öğretmen adaylarının program inançlarının akademik, bilişsel süreçler, sosyalyeniden yapılanmacı, insancıl ve teknoloji faktörleri aracılığıyla incelenebileceğini göstermiştir. Bulgular ayrıca, öğretmen adaylarının program inançları arasındaki ilişkilerin pozitif yönlü ve orta düzeyde olduğunu, bu inançların Yüksek Düzeyli Program İnançları ve Düşük Düzeyli Program İnançları olarak adlandırılan iki ayrı kümede tanımlanabileceğini de ortaya koymuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

EREN, A. (2010). PROFILE ANALYSIS OF STUDENT TEACHERS’ CURRICULUM BELIEFS. Kastamonu Education Journal, Cilt: 18 Sayı: 2, 379–388. https://ajindex.com/articles/941103

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy product. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332
  2. Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 498-504
  3. Eren, A. (2006). Üniversite öğrencilerinin genel ve alan-odaklı epistemolojik inançlarının incelenmesi. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Bolu
  4. Rakıcıoğlu, A. (2005). The relationship between epistemological beliefs and teacher efficacy beliefs of English language teaching trainees. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Bolu
  5. Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19, 317-328
  6. Özgün-Koca, A. A. ve Şen, A. İ. (2006). The beliefs and perceptions of pre-service teachers enrolled in a subject-area dominant teacher education program about effective education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(7), 946-960
  7. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman
  8. Işıkoğlu, N., Baştürk, R., ve Karaca, F. (Baskıda). Assesing in-service teachers’ instructional beliefs about student_centered education: A turkish perspective. Teaching and Teacher education
  9. Cheung, D. Ve Wong, H. W. (2002). Measuring teacher beliefs about alternative curriculum designs. Curriculum Journal, 13(2), 225–248
  10. McMullen, M., Elicker, J., Wang, J. et al. (2005). Comparing beliefs about appropriate practice among early childhood education and care professionals from the U.S., China, Taiwan, Korea and Turkey. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 20, 451–464
  11. Andrews, P. (2007). The curricular importance of mathematics: A comparison of English and Hungarian teachers’ espoused beliefs. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 39(3), 317-338
  12. Van Driel, J. H., Bulte, A. M. W., ve Verloop, N. (2008). Using the curriculum emphasis concept to invetsigate teachers’ curricular beliefs in the context of educational reform. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(1), 107–122
  13. Wang, J., Elicker, J., McMullen, M. et al. (2008). Chinese and American preschool teachers’ beliefs about early childhood curriculum. Early Childhood Development and Care, 178(3), 227–249
  14. Demirel, Ö. (1999). Planlamadan değerlendirmeye öğretme sanatı. Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık
  15. Sönmez, V. (1999). Program geliştirmede öğretmen el k