Journals / Kastamonu Education Journal / 2012 / Cilt: 20 Sayı: 3

THE ROLE OF HOPE AND THE MEANING IN LIFE IN EXPLAINING SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING

Öznel İyi Oluşu Açıklamada Umut ve Yaşamda Anlamın

Pages
827–836
Publication Date
2012-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Subjective well-being did not vary in terms of the students’ gender, on the other hand there were significant differences by class-level.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The present study aimed to investigate the effect of hope and the meaning in life on subjective well-being in univesity sample.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sample of the study included 285 university students.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Subjective well-being did not vary in terms of the students’ gender, on the other hand there were significant differences by class-level.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Öznel iyi oluş · umut · yaşamda anlam

Abstract

The present study aimed to investigate the effect of hope and the meaning in life on subjective well-being in univesity sample. In addition to this, examination of subjective well-being in terms of gender and class level variables was also aimed. The sample of the study included 285 university students. Of these students, 214 75% were female and 71 25% were male. To collect the data, Personal Data Form, Subjective Well-Being Scale, Hope Scale and Meaning in Life Questionnaire were used. Obtained data were analysed through SPSS 15.0. software. Pearson correlation coefficient, multiple linear regression analysis, Mann Whitney-U test and the Kruskal Wallis H test were utilized in the analysis of the data. Results of the analysis showed that the hope and the dimensions of meaning in life namely “existence of the meaning” and “pursuit of meaning” were significant predictors of the subjective well-being. Subjective well-being did not vary in terms of the students’ gender, on the other hand there were significant differences by class-level.

Özet

Bu araştırma üniversite örnekleminde umut ve yaşamda anlamın öznel iyi oluş üzerindeki etkisini incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bunun yanında öznel iyi oluşun cinsiyet ve sınıf düzeyi değişkenleri açısından incelenmesi de amaçlanmıştır. Çalışma grubunu 214’ü kız % 75. , 71’i erkek % 25 olmak üzere toplam 285 öğrenci oluşturmuştur. Veri toplamak amacıyla, Demografik Bilgi Formu, Öznel İyi Oluş Ölçeği, Umut Ölçeği ve Yaşamda Anlam Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Toplanan veriler SPSS 15.0 versiyonu ile analiz edilmiştir. Analizlerde Pearson korelasyon katsayısı tekniği, çoklu doğrusal regresyon analizi, Mann Whitney U testi ve Kruskal Wallis H testi kullanılmıştır. Analizler sonucunda elde edilen bulgular, umudun ve yaşamda anlamın boyutları olan “anlamın varlığı” ve “anlam arayışı” nın öznel iyi oluşun anlamlı birer yordayıcısı olduğunu göstermektedir. Öznel iyi oluş düzeyi cinsiyet açısından farklılaşmamaktadır, sınıf düzeyi açısından ise anlamlı farklılıklar bulunmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞAHİN, M., AYDIN, B., SARI, S. V., KAYA, S., PALA, H. (2012). THE ROLE OF HOPE AND THE MEANING IN LIFE IN EXPLAINING SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING. Kastamonu Education Journal, Cilt: 20 Sayı: 3, 827–836. https://ajindex.com/articles/941003

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Gilham, J. E. & Seligman, M. E. (1999). Footsteps on the road to positive psychology. Behavior Research and Therapy, 37, 163-173
  2. Seligman, M. E. (2002). Positive psychology, positive prevention and positive therapy. Handbook of positive psychology. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.). Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 3-13). New York: Oxford University Press
  3. Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55(1), 34-43
  4. Diener, E., Lucas, R. E. & Oishi, S. (2002). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and life satisfaction. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.). Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 63-74). New York:Oxford University Press
  5. Gallagher, M. W. (2009) Well-being. In S. J. Lopez (Ed.). Encylopedia of positive psychology 834 Mustafa ŞAHİN, Betül AYDIN, Serkan Volkan SARI, Sezen KAYA, Havva PALA Eylül 2012 Cilt:20 No:3 Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi (pp. 1030-1034). West Sussex: John Wiley and Sons
  6. Ryff, C. & Singer, B. (2008). Know themself and become what you are: A eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies,9, 13-39
  7. Snyder, C. R. & Lopez, S. J. (2007). Positive psychology: The scientific and practical explorations of human strengths. California: Sage Publications
  8. Diener, E., Suh, E. M. & Osihi, S. (1997) Recent findings on subjective well-being. http:// www.filozofija.lv/research/Ed_Diener_Recent_Findings_on_Subjective_Well-Being.doc (13.04.2011 tarihinde erişildi)
  9. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E. & Smith, H. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276-302
  10. Snyder, C. R., LaPointe, A. B., Crowson, J. J. & Early, S. (1998). Preferences of high- and low-hope people for self-referential input. Cognition & Emotion, 12(6), 807-823
  11. Snyder, C. R., Feldman, D. B., Taylor, J. D., Schoeder, L. L. & Adams, V. H. (2000). The role of hopeful thinking in preventing problems and enhancing strenghts. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 9(4), 249-269
  12. Irving, L. M., Snyder, C. R. & Crowson, J. J. (1998). Hoping and coping with cancer by college women. Personality & Individual Differences, 66 (2), 195-214
  13. Snyder, C. R., Harris, C., Anderson, J. R., Holleran, S. A., Irving, L. M., Sigmon, S. T., Yoshinobu, L., Gibb, L., June, L. & Charyle, H. P. (1991).The will and the ways: Development and validation of an individual-differe