Journals / Kastamonu Education Journal / 2018 / Cilt: 26 Sayı: 1

An Investigation of Prospective Secondary Mathematics Teachers’ Experience on Teaching: From Theory to Practice

Lise Matematik Öğretmeni Adaylarının Öğretmenlik Deneyimleri: Teoriden Uygulamaya Geçiş

Pages
93–99
Publication Date
2018-01-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results, besides mainly having knowledge of instructional strategies, the prospective mathematics teachers have limited knowledge of students’ thinking.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of the study is to investigate prospective mathematics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in their first teaching experience.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We collected data during prospective mathematics teachers’ school experience course that lasts for 14 weeks.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results, besides mainly having knowledge of instructional strategies, the prospective mathematics teachers have limited knowledge of students’ thinking.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Pedagojik alan bilgisi · matematik öğretmeni adayları · öğretim bilgisi

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to investigate prospective mathematics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in their first teaching experience. We collected data during prospective mathematics teachers’ school experience course that lasts for 14 weeks. The data for this study was collected through three group discussion interviews during the "school experience" course. We have conducted two classroom observations while prospective students’ applied activities during their teaching experience in classrooms. We analyzed the data in accordance with the content analysis. According to the results, besides mainly having knowledge of instructional strategies, the prospective mathematics teachers have limited knowledge of students’ thinking.

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı lise matematik öğretmeni adaylarının ilk öğretmenlik tecrübeleri bağlamındaki pedagojik alan bilgilerini ortaya çıkarmaktır. Araştırmanın verileri 14 hafta boyunca öğretmen adaylarının aldıkları okul deneyimi dersi kapsamında toplanmıştır. Okul deneyimi dersi boyunca üç adet odak grup görüşmesi ve iki adet sınıf gözlemi yapılmıştır. Araştırmanın verileri içerik analizi aracılığıyla analiz edilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular göz önüne alındığında, öğretmen adaylarının pedagojik alan bilgilerinin ağırlıklı olarak öğretimle ilgili olduğu ve sınırlı da olsa öğrenci düşünmesiyle ilgili bilgilerinin de olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

EMRE-AKDOĞAN, E., YAZGAN-SAĞ, G. (2018). An Investigation of Prospective Secondary Mathematics Teachers’ Experience on Teaching: From Theory to Practice. Kastamonu Education Journal, Cilt: 26 Sayı: 1, 93–99. https://ajindex.com/articles/940527

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. An, S.,Kulm, G., & Wu, Z. (2004). The pedagogical content knowledge of middle school, Mathematics teachers in China and the U.S. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7(2), 145–172.
  2. Auerbach, C. F., & Silverstein, L. B. (2003). Qualitative data: An introduction to coding and analysis. New York, NY: New York University Press.
  3. Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., & others (2010).Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 133–180.
  4. Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Peterson, P. L., & Carey, D. (1988). Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of students’ problem solving. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 19(5), 385-401.
  5. Chick, H. L., Baker, M., Pham, T., & Cheng, H. (2006). Aspects of teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for decimals. In J. Novotná, H. Moraová, M. Krátká, & N. Stehlíková (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 297-304).
  6. Prague, Czech Republic: PME. Feiman-Nemser, S.,&Parker, M. B. (1990).Making Subject Matter Part of the Conversation or Helping Beginning Teachers Learn to Teach. (Research Report No.90-3) East Lansing,MI: National Center for Research on Teacher Education. Fennema, E. &Franke, M. L. (1992).Teachers’ knowledge and its impact. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 147-164). New York: Macmillan. Grossman, P. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  7. Grouws, D. A. & Schultz, K. A. (1996). Mathematics Teacher Education. In J. Sicula, T. Buttery & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Teacher Education (pp. 442-458). New York: Macmillan Library Reference USA. Hacıömeroğlu, G. (2013). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının öğretim için matematiksel bilgisi: Öğrencilerin Toplama ve çıkarma işlemlerine ilişkin çözüm yollarının analizi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 38(168), 303-317.
  8. Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking Pedagogical Content Knowledge: Conceptualizing and Measuring Teachers’ Topic-Specific Knowledge of Students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372–400.
  9. Kinach, B. M. (2002). A cognitive strategy for developing pedagogical content knowledge in the secondary mathematics methods course: toward a model of effective practice. Teaching and Teacher Educ