SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kastamonu Education Journal / 2020 / Cilt: 28 Sayı: 2

Determination of Vocational High School Students’ Learning Responsibility Level In Terms of Various Variables

Meslek Yüksekokulu Öğrencilerinin Öğrenme Sorumluluğu Düzeyinin Çeşitli Değişkenlere Göre Belirlenmesi

Fidan HAKKARİ
Pages
650–661
Publication Date
2020-03-20
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, it was determined that the students' learning responsibility and its sub-dimensions scores in terms of the vocational high schools they were studying differed significantly in favor of the students of the Reyhanlı Social Sciences Vocational High School and Antakya Vocational High School.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to determine the level of vocational high school students' learning responsibility.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study, which designed as survey model, participants consisted of 205 vocational high schools students.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, it was determined that the students' learning responsibility and its sub-dimensions scores in terms of the vocational high schools they were studying differed significantly in favor of the students of the Reyhanlı Social Sciences Vocational High School and Antakya Vocational High School.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:öğrenme sorumluluğu · öğrenme sorumluluğu davranışları · meslek yüksekokulu öğrencileri

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine the level of vocational high school students' learning responsibility. Learning Responsibility Scale (SCQ) was used for collection of data. The study, which designed as survey model, participants consisted of 205 vocational high schools students. During the data analysis, mean, standard deviation, t-test and the one way Anova were used. As a result of the research; it was determined that students' learning responsibility level was above the average of scale. At the same time, it was determined that the students' learning responsibility scores did not differ statistically according to students' gender, class levels and place of residence. In addition, it was determined that the students' learning responsibility and its sub-dimensions scores in terms of the vocational high schools they were studying differed significantly in favor of the students of the Reyhanlı Social Sciences Vocational High School and Antakya Vocational High School.

Özet

Bu çalışma, meslek yüksekokulu öğrencilerinin öğrenme sorumluluk düzeylerini belirlemeyi amaçlamıştır. Veriler Öğrenme Sorumluluğu Ölçeği ile toplanmıştır. Tarama modelindeki araştırmanın örneklemini 205 meslek yüksekokulu öğrencisi oluşturmaktadır Veriler ortalama, standart sapma, t-testi, ANOVA ile analiz edilmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda; öğrencilerinin öğrenme sorumluluğu düzeylerinin ölçek orta değerinin üzerinde olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Aynı zamanda öğrencilerin öğrenme sorumluluk puanlarının öğrencilerin cinsiyetlerine, sınıf düzeylerine ve ikamet ettikleri yerlere göre istatistiksel olarak farklılaşmadığı tespit edilmiştir. Bununla birlikte öğrencilerin öğrenim gördükleri okullara göre öğrenme sorumluluğu ve alt boyut puanları bakımından Reyhanlı Sosyal Bilimler MYO ve Antakya Meslek Yüksekokulu öğrencileri lehine anlamlı farklılık tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

HAKKARİ, F. (2020). Determination of Vocational High School Students’ Learning Responsibility Level In Terms of Various Variables. Kastamonu Education Journal, Cilt: 28 Sayı: 2, 650–661. https://ajindex.com/articles/940221

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Akbay, S.E., Capri, B. ve Gunduz B. (2013). Development of the academic responsibility scale (ARS): A validity and reliability study. International Journal of Academic Research Part B, 5(4), 440-446.
  2. Allan, G. M. (2006). Responsibility for learning: students’ understandings and their self-reported learning attitudes and behaviours (Master Thesis). Queensland University of Technology, Queensland. Attard, A., Di Iorio, E., Geven, K. & Santa, R. (2010). Student-centred learning: Toolkit for students, staff and higher education institutions. European Students' Union (NJ1), 7-12.
  3. Bayraktar, T. ve Güvenç, D. (2014). Meslek yüksekokulu öğrencilerinin kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk algisini belirleme üzerine bir araştirma: Kandıra meslek yüksekokulu örneği. Çalışma İlişkileri Dergisi, 5(2), 40-50.
  4. Beth, A. D., Jordan, M. E., Schallert, D. L., Reed, J. H., & Kim, M. (2015). Responsibility and generativity in online learning communities. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(4), 471-484.
  5. Carnell, E. (2005). Understanding and enriching young people's learning: Issues, complexities and challenges. Improving Schools, 8(3), 269–284.
  6. Carpenter, J. P. & Pease, J. S. (2013). Preparing students to take responsibility for learning: The role of non-curricular learning strategies. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction (JoCI), 7(2), 38-55.
  7. Cook-Sather, A. ve Luz, A. (2015). Greater engagement in and responsibility for learning: What happens when students cross the threshold of student–faculty partnership, Higher Education Research ve Development, 34(6), 1097-1109.
  8. Corno, L. (1992). Encouraging students to take responsibility for learning and performance. The Elementary School Journal, 93(1), 69-83.
  9. Dembo, M. H., ve Eaton, M. J. (2000). Self-regulation of Academic Learning in Middle-level Scho-ols. The Elementary School Journal, 100,473–490.
  10. Erdem, M. ve Akkoyunlu, B. (2002). İlköğretim sosyal bilgiler dersi kapsaminda beşinci sinif öğrencileriyle yürütülen ekiple proje tabanli öğrenme üzerine bir çalişma. İlköğretim Online, 1(1), 2-11.
  11. Erişti, B. (2017). Öğrenme sorumluluğu ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi (EFMED), 11(1), 481-503.
  12. Fritz, J. (2017). Using analytics to nudge student responsibility for learning. New Directions for Higher Education, 179, 65–75.
  13. Games, P.A. (1971). Multiple comparisons of means. American Educational Research Journal, 8, 531-564.
  14. George, D. & Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for windows step by step