Journals / Journal of Teacher Education and Educators / 2023 / Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1

Pre- and In-Service Teachers’ Teamwork Behaviour in Integrated Teacher Training

Pages
95–121
Publication Date
2023-04-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the surveys, the participants scored both team behaviour and their own behaviour in the team relatively highly, but their own behaviour was evaluated as somewhat better than the overall team behaviour.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Teamwork and collaboration skills are regarded as essential proficiencies in the current worlds of work, study and everyday life.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A relevant question is whether and how pre-service teachers have opportunities to begin acquiring professional collaboration skills during their studies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the surveys, the participants scored both team behaviour and their own behaviour in the team relatively highly, but their own behaviour was evaluated as somewhat better than the overall team behaviour.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:teamwork · reflection · teacher education

Abstract

Teamwork and collaboration skills are regarded as essential proficiencies in the current worlds of work, study and everyday life. A relevant question is whether and how pre-service teachers have opportunities to begin acquiring professional collaboration skills during their studies. In the current study, Finnish pre- and in-service teachers participating in a joint training programme were engaged in reflection tasks to evaluate their teamwork behaviour during a challenging pedagogical design task in mixed teams. The aim of this study was to examine how pre- and in-service teachers perceived their teamwork practices while performing authentic training activities together. The participants reflected on their own and their teams’ behaviour in two ways: using a digital reflection survey tool repeatedly during the process and writing a reflection text. In the surveys, the participants scored both team behaviour and their own behaviour in the team relatively highly, but their own behaviour was evaluated as somewhat better than the overall team behaviour. In the reflective writing assignments, team behaviour was addressed more often than one’s own behaviour. Experiences were mostly positive, but the participants also reported varying challenges. Based on the results, it can be suggested that to better guarantee the development of pre- and in-service teachers’ collaboration skills, systematic guidance with adequate tools, is the requisite.

🔖

Cite This Article

VESİSENAHO, M., LAKKALA, M., MANU, M., PÖYSÄ-TARHONEN, J., KALLUNKİ, V., KYLLÖNEN, M., TOOM, A., PELTONEN, M., HÄKKİNEN, P. (2023). Pre- and In-Service Teachers’ Teamwork Behaviour in Integrated Teacher Training. Journal of Teacher Education and Educators, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1, 95–121. https://ajindex.com/articles/937820

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Allan, E. G. (2016). “I hate group work!”: Addressing students’ concerns about small-group learning. InSight: A Journal of Scholarly Teaching, 11, 81–89. Retrieved from https://insightjournal.park.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/8-Allan.pdf
  2. Anseel, F., Lievens, F., & Schollaert, E. (2009). Reflection as a strategy to enhance task performance after feedback. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110(1), 23–35. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.05.003 Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in teaching and teacher education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 10–20.
  3. Belski, R., & Belski, I. (2014). Cultivating student skills in self-regulated learning through evaluation of task complexity. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(5), 459–469. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2014.880685 Bengtsson, J. (1995). What is reflection? On reflection in the teaching profession and teacher education. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 1(1), 23–32.
  4. Britton, E., Simper, N., Leger, A., & Stephenson, J. (2017). Assessing teamwork in undergraduate education: A measurement tool to evaluate individual teamwork skills. Null, 42(3), 378–397. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2015.1116497 Broussard, S. R., La Lopa, J. M., & Ross-Davis, A. (2007). Synergistic knowledge development in interdisciplinary teams. Journal of Natural Resources & Life Sciences Education, 36, 129–133.
  5. Buder, J. (2011). Group awareness tools for learning: Current and future directions. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1114–1117. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.012 Cremers, P. H. M., Wals, A. E. J., Wesselink R., & Mulder, M. (2016). Design principles for hybrid learning configurations at the interface between school and workplace. Learning Environments Research, 19(3), 309–334.
  6. Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage publications. Decuyper, S., Dochy, F., & Van den Bossche, P. (2010). Grasping the dynamic complexity of team learning: An integrative model for effective team learning in organisations. Educational Research Review, 5(2), 111–133. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2010.02.002 Dobber, M. (2011). Collaboration in groups during teacher education (Doctoral thesis, ICLON, Leiden University). Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1887/17720
  7. Durall, E., Leinonen, T., Gros, B., & Rodriguez-Kaarto, T. (2017). Reflection in learning through a self-monitoring device: Design research on EEG self-monitoring during a s