SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning / 2023 / Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2

The effect of internet of things education through distance education on student success and motivation

Emre ÖZGÜL
Mehmet Akif OCAK
Pages
403–420
Publication Date
2023-05-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the research, it was concluded that the students in the asynchronous group were more successful in their academic achievement post-test scores.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Internet of Things (IoT) is one of those technologies with a wide range of applications, from planes to cars, from factories to homes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The participants, consisting of 35 students from different engineering departments, were randomly assigned to experimental and control groups.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the research, it was concluded that the students in the asynchronous group were more successful in their academic achievement post-test scores.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:IoT · Internet of Things · IoT Training

Abstract

The Internet of Things (IoT) is one of those technologies with a wide range of applications, from planes to cars, from factories to homes. As IoT technology is an interdisciplinary field, it is generally one of the most difficult subjects to learn. Therefore, there is a need to use and develop new teaching methods to facilitate the teaching of IoT technology. This quasi-experimental study aims to examine the effects of synchronous and asynchronous distance courses on students' achievement and motivation in IoT education. The participants, consisting of 35 students from different engineering departments, were randomly assigned to experimental and control groups. The experimental group was instructed asynchronously on the Edpuzzle platform, where interactive videos were presented, and control group was taught synchronously on the Zoom application for 8 weeks. As a result of the research, it was concluded that the students in the asynchronous group were more successful in their academic achievement post-test scores. Although the synchronous group scored higher in terms of motivation, it was concluded that there was no significant difference from the other group.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZGÜL, E., OCAK, M. A. (2023). The effect of internet of things education through distance education on student success and motivation. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 403–420. https://ajindex.com/articles/937777

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Abd-Ali, R. S., Radhi, S. A., & Rasool, Z. I. (2020). A survey: the role of the internet of things in the development of education. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 19(1), 215-221.
  2. Abraham, S. (2016). Using internet of things (IoT) as a platform to enhance interest in electrical and computer engineering. In 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Agrawal, S. R., & Mittal, D. (2019). Constructive usage of whatsapp in education sector for strengthening relations. International Journal of Educational Management, 33(5), 954–964.
  3. Al-Balas, M., Al-Balas, H. I., Jaber, H. M., Obeidat, K., Al-Balas, H., Aborajooh, E. A., Al-Taher, R., & Al-Balas, B. (2020). Distance learning in clinical medical education amid COVID-19 pandemic in Jordan: Current situation, challenges, and perspectives. BMC Medical Education, 20(1), 1–7.
  4. Aldowah, H., Rehman, S. U., Ghazal, S., & Umar, I. N. (2017). Internet of Things in higher education: a study on future learning. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 892(1), 012017.
  5. Al-Emran, M., Malik, S. I., & Al-Kabi, M. N. (2020). A survey of internet of things (IoT) in education: Opportunities and challenges. In Toward social internet of things (SIoT): Enabling technologies, architectures and applications (pp. 197–209).
  6. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. Almatrafi, O., & Johri, A. (2018). Systematic review of discussion forums in massive open online courses (MOOCs). IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 12(3), 413-428.
  7. Aydın, A., Usanmaz, B., & Göktaş, Y. (2021). Nesnelerin İnterneti’nin Eğitimde Kullanıldığı Alanlar ve Bu Alanlara Etkileri. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 11(2), 425-436.
  8. Banger, G. (2018). Endüstri 4.0. Dorlion Yayınları.
  9. Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L., Wallet, P. A., Fiset, M., & Huang, B. (2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 379–439.
  10. Boulos, M. N. K., Taylor, A. D., & Breton, A. (2005). A synchronous communication experiment within an online distance learning program: A case study. Telemedicine Journal & e-Health, 11(5), 583-593.
  11. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007). Deneysel desenler öntest-sontest kontrol grubu desen ve veri analizi. Pegem A Yayıncılık. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2019). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Pegem Akademi. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Akgün, Ö. E., Kahveci, Ö. ve Demirel, F. (2004). Güdülenme ve öğrenme stratejile