SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 23 Sayı: 2

How Cynicism Mediates Spiritual Leadership and Organizational Commitment? (The case of Turkish and Indonesian Universities)

Fetullah BATTAL
Azharsyah IBRAHIM
Pages
315–330
Publication Date
2023-05-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results obtained in the study, as the perception of spiritual leadership of academics working in Turkey and Indonesia gets stronger, their commitment to the organization also increases.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to reveal the role of cynicism in the relationship between university employees' perceived spiritual leadership and their organizational commitment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to the results obtained in the study, as the perception of spiritual leadership of academics working in Turkey and Indonesia gets stronger, their commitment to the organization also increases.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In other words, it is seen that cynicism has a partial mediating role in the relationship between the perception of spiritual leadership and commitment to the organization for both countries.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Spiritual Leadership · Cynicism Behavior · Organizational Commitment

Abstract

This study aims to reveal the role of cynicism in the relationship between university employees' perceived spiritual leadership and their organizational commitment. As a scope, university employees who continue their education activities in Turkey and Indonesia were handled, so the comparison method based on cultural differences was preferred. In the method of the study, SPSS statistical program was used for correlation analysis and determination of normal distributions, and AMOS structural equation modeling was used to reveal regression relations. According to the results obtained in the study, as the perception of spiritual leadership of academics working in Turkey and Indonesia gets stronger, their commitment to the organization also increases. At the same time, when university employees perceive cynicism in the organization, their commitment to spiritual leadership and organization weakens. In other words, it is seen that cynicism has a partial mediating role in the relationship between the perception of spiritual leadership and commitment to the organization for both countries.

🔖

Cite This Article

BATTAL, F., IBRAHIM, A. (2023). How Cynicism Mediates Spiritual Leadership and Organizational Commitment? (The case of Turkish and Indonesian Universities). Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi, Cilt: 23 Sayı: 2, 315–330. https://ajindex.com/articles/937272

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Abraham, R. (2000). Organizational cynicism: Bases and consequences. Genetic, social, and general psychology monographs, 126(3), 269. Ahmet, K. A. Y. A., Göçen, A., & Mehmet, U. Z. U. N. Öğretmenlerin Bilgi Uçurma Nedenlerinin Örgütsel Sinizm Ve Özdeşleşme İle Olan İlişkisi: Bir Yol Analizi Çalışması. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(1), 207-224.
  2. Akçay, M. (2005). Gazzâli'de Ruh Tasavvuru. Dini Araştırmalar, 7(21), 87-116.
  3. Aljawarneh, N. M. S., & Atan, T. (2018). Linking tolerance to workplace incivility, service innovative, knowledge hiding, and job search behavior: The mediating role of employee cynicism. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 11(4), 298-320.
  4. Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1996). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: An examination of construct validity. Journal of vocational behavior, 49(3), 252-276.
  5. Andersson, L. M., & Bateman, T. S. (1997). Cynicism in the workplace: Some causes and effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 18(5), 449-469.
  6. Aydın, H. Kusta B. Luka Ve Ruh İle Nefs Arasındaki Ayırım Adlı Kitabı. Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 40(1), 387-402.
  7. Aydın, M. (1991).
  8. Eğitim Yönetimi, Ankara: Hatipoğlu Yayınevi.
  9. Üçüncü Baskı.
  10. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173. Batmunkh, M. (2011). Liderlik tarzları ile örgütsel bağlılık ve örgütsel sessizlik arasındaki ilişki ve bir araştırma (Doctoral dissertation, Marmara Universitesi (Turkey). Battal, F. (2020). Örgütsel Adalet ve Örgütsel Bağlılık İlişkisinde Örgütsel Özdeşleşmenin Rolü: Üniversite Çalışanları Üzerine Bir Örnek. OPUS Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 15(24), 2362-2393.
  11. Bennis, W. G., & Townsend, R. (1989). On becoming a leader (Vol. 36). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Bilgiç, H. F. (2017). Liderlik ile örgütsel sinizm ilişkisi. KSOS, 90. Bozkuş, K., & Gündüz, Y. (2016). Ruhsal Liderlik İle Örgütsel Bağlılık Arasındaki İlişkinin Modellenmesi. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 24(1), 405-420.
  12. Brandes, P., Dharwadkar, R., & Dean, J. W. (1999, May). Does organizational cynicism matter? Employee and supervisor perspectives on work outcomes. In Eastern Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 150-153).
  13. Brown, G.