Journals / Kafkas Journal of Medical Sciences / 2023 / Cilt: 13 Sayı: 1

The Cost-effectiveness of Clomiphene Citrate Against Gonadotropin Therapy in Women with Unexplained Infertility

Pages
39–44
Publication Date
2023-04-26
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, considering the cost-effectiveness and side effects of GND medication, the first choice should be CC in these patients.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Clomiphene citrate (CC) is the most frequently used agent for ovarian stimulation (OS).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: The cost-effectiveness and success of CC and GND were retrospectively evaluated in 358 infertile women, of whom 247 received CC and 11 received GND treatment.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, considering the cost-effectiveness and side effects of GND medication, the first choice should be CC in these patients.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:clinical pregnancy · clomiphene citrate · gonadotropin

Abstract

Aim: Clomiphene citrate (CC) is the most frequently used agent for ovarian stimulation (OS). Gonadotropin (GND) treatment can be encouraged as a next step in women who are not able to become pregnant with CC. We aimed to determine the efficacy and costeffectiveness of CC and GND in patients with unexplained infertility undergoing OS and intrauterine insemination. Material and Method: The cost-effectiveness and success of CC and GND were retrospectively evaluated in 358 infertile women, of whom 247 received CC and 11 received GND treatment. The total CC/GND dose, endometrial thickness, semen parameters, duration of OS, follicle size, and pregnancy outcome were recorded. The medical costs of both strategies were analyzed, including the costs of medication and cycle monitoring. The cost of insemination was not evaluated since it was applied in both groups. The Shapiro-Wilk test, Student’s t-test and Mann-Whitney U test were used for statistical analyses. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of cycle characteristics, semen analysis, total drug dose used, duration of OS, and dominant follicle size (p>0.05 for all). The pregnancy rate was 23.5% among the 264 (73.7%) patients with primary infertility and 17% among the 94 (26.3%) patients with secondary infertility. No significant difference was observed between the CC and GND groups with regard to the achieved pregnancy rate (21.1% vs. 23.4%, p=0.615). No side effect was observed. The cost of treatment for a couple with unexplained infertility was 1,716.42 TL for GND and 30.67 TL for CC. Conclusion: The treatment success of OS with CC and GND seems to be similar in patients with unexplained infertility. Therefore, considering the cost-effectiveness and side effects of GND medication, the first choice should be CC in these patients.

🔖

Cite This Article

PEKCAN, M. K., AKGÜN, N., ULUBASOGLU, H., EROĞLU, R. E., TASCİ, Y. (2023). The Cost-effectiveness of Clomiphene Citrate Against Gonadotropin Therapy in Women with Unexplained Infertility. Kafkas Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 1, 39–44. https://ajindex.com/articles/936533

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Tomlinson MJ, Amissah-Arthur JB, Thompson KA, Kasraie JL, Bentick B. Prognostic indicators for intrauterine insemination (IUI): statistical model for IUI success. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:1892–6
  2. Dankert T, Kremer JA, Cohlen BJ, Hamilton CJ, Pasker-de Jong PC, Straatman H, et al. A randomized clinical trial of Clomiphene citrate versus low dose recombinant FSH for ovarian hyperstimulation in intrauterine insemination cycles for unexplained and male subfertility. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:792–7
  3. Barroso G, Menocal G, Felix H, Rojas-Ruiz JC, Arslan M, Oehninger S. Comparison of the efficacy of the aromatase inhibitor letrozole and Clomiphenee citrate as adjuvants to recombinant folliclestimulating hormone in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: a prospective, randomized, blinded clinical trial. Fertil Steril. 2006;86:1428–31
  4. Fisher SA, Reid RL, Van Vugt DA, Casper RF. A randomized double-blind comparison of the effects of clomiphene citrate and the aromatase inhibitor letrozole on ovulatory function in normal women. Fertil Steril. 2002;78:280–5
  5. Kaplan PF, Patel M, Austin DJ, Freund R. Assessing the risk of multiple gestation in gonadotropin intrauterine insemination cycles. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186:1244–7
  6. World Health Organization. Laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and semen- cervical mucus interaction, 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999
  7. Gleicher N, Oleske DM, Tur-Kaspa I, Vidali A, Karande V. Reducing the risk of high-order multiple pregnancy after ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:2–7
  8. Tur R, Barri PN, Coroleu B, Buxaderas R, Martínez F, Balasch J. Risk factors for high-order multiple implantation after ovarian stimulation with gonadotrophins: evidence from a large series of 1878 consecutive pregnancies in a single centre. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:2124–9
  9. Dhaliwal LK, Sialy RK, Gopalan S, Majumdar S. Minimal stimulation protocol for use with intrauterine insemination in the treatment of infertility. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2002;28:295–9
  10. Karen Peeraer, J. Luyten, C. Tomassetti, S. Verschueren, C. Spiessens, A. Tanghe, et al. Cost-effectiveness of ovarian stimulation with gonadotrophin and clomiphene citrate in an intrauterine insemination programme for subfertile couples. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 2018; 36(3):302–10
  11. Balasch J, Ballescá JL, Pimentel C, Creus M, Fábregues F, Vanrell JA. Late low-dose pure follicle stimulating hormone for ovarian stimulation in