Journals / İstanbul Journal of Pharmacy / 2023 / Cilt: 53 Sayı: 1

Antibiotic susceptibility and biofilm formation of multi-drug resistant Gram-negative bacteria

Pages
45–50
Publication Date
2023-04-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall, 56% of isolates were strong formers, and 29% were moderate biofilm formers.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background and Aims: Gram-negative bacteria are important pathogens that can cause community- and hospital-acquired infections as well as opportunistic infections, with antimicrobial resistance in Gram-negative bacteria becoming a growing crisis in clinical medicine.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Therefore, this study investigates the antimicrobial resistances and biofilm-forming abilities of a total of 98 Gram-negative strains isolated from various clinical specimens.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall, 56% of isolates were strong formers, and 29% were moderate biofilm formers.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Multi-drug resistance · antibiotic susceptibility · biofilm

Abstract

Background and Aims: Gram-negative bacteria are important pathogens that can cause community- and hospital-acquired infections as well as opportunistic infections, with antimicrobial resistance in Gram-negative bacteria becoming a growing crisis in clinical medicine. Biofilm formation is one of the mechanisms of bacterial resistance, which makes bacteria less susceptible to antimicrobial agents and unable to be killed by host immune mechanisms. Therefore, this study investigates the antimicrobial resistances and biofilm-forming abilities of a total of 98 Gram-negative strains isolated from various clinical specimens. Methods: A disc diffusion assay was performed to detect the susceptibility profiles of 98 Gram-negative strains. The biofilm- forming abilities of strains were also determined using the Crystal Violet assay. Results: Concerning the disc diffusion assay, most of the isolates were found to be resistant to carbapenems, with more than 90% of Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli isolates being found resistant to ceftazidime and piperacillin. Most of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates (75%) were found to be resistant to imipenem and aztreonam. All isolates had the ability to form biofilms. Overall, 56% of isolates were strong formers, and 29% were moderate biofilm formers. Strong biofilm formation was observed in most strains except for K. pneumoniae. Conclusion: The surveillance of susceptibility profiles and biofilm formation is important for determining their variable sus- ceptibility patterns and aiding in the appropriate management of infections caused by these organisms.

🔖

Cite This Article

OYARDI, Ö., TUYSUZ, M., YILMAZ, F. N., INAN, N., TAN, A. S. B. (2023). Antibiotic susceptibility and biofilm formation of multi-drug resistant Gram-negative bacteria. İstanbul Journal of Pharmacy, Cilt: 53 Sayı: 1, 45–50. https://ajindex.com/articles/936448

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Avcıoğlu, F. & Behçet, M. (2020). Üriner sistem enfeksiyonu et- keni Escherichia coli izolatlarının çeşitli antibiyotiklere direnç oranlarının değerlendirilmesi. Türk Mikrobiyoloji Cemiyeti Dergisi, 50(3), 172-7.
  2. Bader, M. S., Loeb, M., Leto, D., & Brooks, A. A. (2020). Treatment of urinary tract infections in the era of antimicrobial resistance and new antimicrobial agents. Postgraduate Medicine, 132(3), 234–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/00325481.2019.1680052
  3. Breijyeh, Z., Jubeh, B., & Karaman, R. (2020). Resistance of gram- negative bacteria to current antibacterial agents and approaches to resolve it. Molecules, 25(6), 1340. Candan, E. D., & Aksöz, N. (2015). Klebsiella pneumoniae: charac- teristics of carbapenem resistance and virulence factors. Acta Biochimica Polonica, 62(4), 867–874. https://doi.org/10.18388/ abp.2015_1148 Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Antibiotic Resis- tance Threats in the United States, 2019.
  4. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Depart- ment of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2019.
  5. Cepas, V., López, Y., Muñoz, E., Rolo, D., Ardanuy, C., Martí, S., Xer- cavins, M., Horcajada, J. P., Bosch, J., & Soto, S. M. (2019). Relation- ship between biofilm formation and antimicrobial resistance in Gram-negative bacteria. Microbial Drug Resistance (Larchmont, N.Y.), 25(1), 72–79. https://doi.org/10.1089/mdr.2018.0027
  6. Chung, H.S., Hong, SG., Lee, Y., Kim, M., Yong, D. Jeong, SH., Lee, K. & Chong, Y. (2012). Antimicrobial susceptibility of Stenotrophomon- as maltophilia isolates from a Korean tertiary care hospital. Yon- sei Medical Journal 53(2), 439-41. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2012.53.2.439. PMID: 22318836; PMCID: PMC3282950. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (2021) Perfor- mance Standards for Antimicrobial. Document M100-Ed.31., Wayne, PA: CLSI. Del Pozo J. L. (2018). Biofilm-related disease. Expert Review of Anti- Infective Therapy, 16(1), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/14787210.2018.1417036
  7. Dosler, S. & Karaaslan E. (2014). Inhibition and destruction of Pseu- domonas aeruginosa biofilms by antibiotics and antimicrobial peptides. Peptides, 62, 32-37.
  8. Dumaru, R., Baral, R., & Shrestha, L. B. (2019). Study of biofilm for- mation and antibiotic resistance pattern of gram-negative Ba- cilli among the clinical isolates at BPKIHS, Dharan. BMC Research Notes, 12(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-019-4084-8
  9. Eichenberger, E. M., & Thaden, J. T. (2019). Epidemiology and mechanisms of resistance of extensively drug resistant Gram- negativ