Journals / Journal of Agricultural Sciences / 2004 / Cilt: 10 Sayı: 01

Determination of Yield and Some Agronomic Characteristics of Corn and Bean Varieties at Row intercropping Systems

Mı s ı r ve Fasulye Çe ş itlerinin Karışı k Ekim Sisteminde Verim ve Bazı Agronomik Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi

Pages
85–92
Publication Date
2004-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The highest seed yields of dwarf and climbing bean were determined from sole cropping in both years

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was conducted to determine effects of various intercropping planting patterns on yield and agronomic characters of dent and sweet corn and dwarf and climbing bean at Isparta ecological conditions in 2000- 2001.
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to the two years experimental results, intercropping has significantly influenced plant height I. year , first ear height, number of kernel per ear, grain and ear yield of dent and sweet corn.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The highest seed yields of dwarf and climbing bean were determined from sole cropping in both years
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000- 2001 Verileri
⚙️Variables:karışı k ekim · atdişi ve şeker m ı s ı r · bodur ve s ı rı k fasulye

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine effects of various intercropping planting patterns on yield and agronomic characters of dent and sweet corn and dwarf and climbing bean at Isparta ecological conditions in 2000- 2001. According to the two years experimental results, intercropping has significantly influenced plant height I. year , first ear height, number of kernel per ear, grain and ear yield of dent and sweet corn. In 2000,the highest grain and ear yield of dent and sweet corn were obtained from sole cropping and corn and dwarf bean alternative rows and sole cropping in 2001, respectively. The highest seed yields of dwarf and climbing bean were determined from sole cropping in both years

Özet

Farkl ı s ı ralarda kar ışı k ekim sistemlerinde atdi şi ve ş eker m ı s ı r çeş itleri ile bodur ve s ı rı k fasulye çeşitlerine ait verim ve baz ı agronomik özelliklerin belirlenmesi amac ı yla yürütülen bu çal ışma, 2000-2001 y ı llar ı aras ı nda iki y ı l süreyle Isparta ko şulları nda yürütülmüştür. İ ki y ı ll ı k araşt ı rma sonuçlar ı na göre; karışı k ekim uygulamalar ı n ı n etkisi atdiş i ve şeker m ı s ı rda bitki boyu I. y ı l , ilk koçan yüksekli ği, koçandaki tane say ı s ı , tane ve koçan verimlerinde önemli bulunmuştur. Atdi şi ve ş eker m ı s ı rda en yüksek tane ve koçan verimleri, denemenin I. y ı l ı yal ı n ve alternatif s ı ralarda bodur fasulye karışı k ekimlerinde, Il. y ı lda ise yal ı n ekimlerde elde edilmi ştir. Fasulye çeşitlerinde ise en yüksek tane verimleri sar ı l ı c ı ve bodur fasulyenin yal ı n ekimlerinde belirlenmi ştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TIRYAKİ, M. K., AKMAN, Z., KARA, B. (2004). Determination of Yield and Some Agronomic Characteristics of Corn and Bean Varieties at Row intercropping Systems. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 01, 85–92. https://ajindex.com/articles/933764

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Akçin, A. 1974. Erzurum Ş artlar ı nda Yetiştirilen Kuru Fasulye Çeşitlerinde Gübreleme, Ekim Zaman ı ve Sı ra Aral ığı n ı n Tane Verimine Etkisi ile Bu Çe şitlerin Baz ı Fenolojik, Morfolojik ve Teknolojik Karekterleri Üzerine Bir Ara şt ı rma. Atatürk Üniv. Ziraat Fak. Yay, No: 157, Erzurum. Akman, Z. ve Ö. Sencar, 1999. M ı s ı r - baklagil (Fasulye ve börülce) birlikte üretiminde farkl ı ekim sistemlerinin verim ve baz ı agronomik karakterlere etkisi. Tr. J. of. Agric and Foresty, 23 (5) 1139-1148.
  2. Bauman, D. T., L. Bastiaans, J. Goudriaan, H. H. Vanlaar and M. J. Kropft, 2002. Analysing crop yield and plant quality in a intercropping system using an eco - physiological model for interplant competition. Agricultural system, 73, 173-203.
  3. Camarena, M. P. and V. A. Cerrate, 1984. Comparisons monoculture and mixed cropping system and optimum sowing dates for bean association with maize and Collejonde Huayles. Peru. Field Crop Abst., 37, 593. Cardero, A. 1978. Principles of Intercropping: Effects of nitrogen fertilization and row arrangement on growth, nitrogen accumulation and yield of corn interplanted understory annuals. Dissertation Ab. International, B, 39 (2) 479-480.
  4. Davis, J. H. and C. S. Garcia, 1983. Competitive ability and growth habit of indeterminate beans and maize for intercropping. Field Crops Res, 6, 59-75.
  5. Francis, C. A. 1986 Multiple Cropping Systems. Mac Millan Publishing Company, 866 Third Avancue, New York, NY 10022. Francis, C. A., M. Prager and G. Tejada, 1982. Density ı nteractions in tropical ı ntercropping.I.Maize (Zea mays L.) and climbing beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Field Crops Res., 5, 163- 176. Galal, S., L. H. Hindi, M. M. F Abdalla and A. A. Metwally, 1980. Soybean and corn yields under different intercropping patterns. World Soybean Res. Conference Il Ab., Boulder, Colorado, Westview Press, 69. Ibrahim, A. F., K. M, Al-rawi, and A. A. Salman,. 1977. Performance of corn ( Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) under intercropping in alternative rows and at different plant population densities. J. Agronomy and Crop Science, 145, 224- 237. Kaçar, B. 1994. Toprak Analizleri. Ankara Üniv. Ziraat Fak. Eğitim Araş. ve Geliştirme Vakf ı Yay ı nları No: 3, S: 89- 95, Ankara.
  6. Kı rtok, Y. 1998. M ı s ı r Üretimi ve Kullan ı m ı. Kocaoluk Bas ı m ve Yay ı n Evi, s 125-129,
  7. İ stanbul. Martin, C. D., Y. Olivar and R. Cavanerio, 1999. Growth and yield in a maize (Z. mays L.) bean (Phaselous vulgaris L.) intercrop, with s