Journals / Journal of Agricultural Sciences / 2007 / Cilt: 13 Sayı: 03

Benchmarking of Irrigation Performance in Akıncı Irrigation District

Akıncı Sulama Birliğinde Sulama Performansının Karşılaştırmalı Değerlendirilmesi

Pages
213–226
Publication Date
2007-08-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Annual water supply ratio was 1.55-1.98, cost recovery ratio was 56-172%, ratio of maintenance cost to revenues was 2.51-10.82%, total management-operation-maintenance cost per unit area was 22.53-108.61 $/ha, total cost per personnel employed in water delivery 1091.09-8658.84 $, water fee collection performance was 70-93%, number of personnel per unit command area was 0.007-0.012 person/ha, gross value of output per unit irrigation area was 364.81-557.81 $/ha, gross value of output per unit irrigated area was 1454.292970.46 $/ha, gross value of output for per unit irrigation water diverted to scheme was 0.106-0.196 $/ m3 and gross value of output for per unit irrigation water consumed was 1.348-2.887 $/ m3

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, benchmarking and assessment of irrigation performance of Akıncı Irrigation, which was put into operation in 1973 by DSI and transferred to irrigation association in 1998, were aimed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, benchmarking and assessment of irrigation performance of Akıncı Irrigation, which was put into operation in 1973 by DSI and transferred to irrigation association in 1998, were aimed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Annual water supply ratio was 1.55-1.98, cost recovery ratio was 56-172%, ratio of maintenance cost to revenues was 2.51-10.82%, total management-operation-maintenance cost per unit area was 22.53-108.61 $/ha, total cost per personnel employed in water delivery 1091.09-8658.84 $, water fee collection performance was 70-93%, number of personnel per unit command area was 0.007-0.012 person/ha, gross value of output per unit irrigation area was 364.81-557.81 $/ha, gross value of output per unit irrigated area was 1454.292970.46 $/ha, gross value of output for per unit irrigation water diverted to scheme was 0.106-0.196 $/ m3 and gross value of output for per unit irrigation water consumed was 1.348-2.887 $/ m3
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sulama performansı · karşılaştırmalı değerlendirme · performans göstergesi

Abstract

In this study, benchmarking and assessment of irrigation performance of Akıncı Irrigation, which was put into operation in 1973 by DSI and transferred to irrigation association in 1998, were aimed. Annual water supply ratio was 1.55-1.98, cost recovery ratio was 56-172%, ratio of maintenance cost to revenues was 2.51-10.82%, total management-operation-maintenance cost per unit area was 22.53-108.61 $/ha, total cost per personnel employed in water delivery 1091.09-8658.84 $, water fee collection performance was 70-93%, number of personnel per unit command area was 0.007-0.012 person/ha, gross value of output per unit irrigation area was 364.81-557.81 $/ha, gross value of output per unit irrigated area was 1454.292970.46 $/ha, gross value of output for per unit irrigation water diverted to scheme was 0.106-0.196 $/ m3 and gross value of output for per unit irrigation water consumed was 1.348-2.887 $/ m3

Özet

Bu çalışmada Devlet Su İşleri tarafından 1973 yılında işletmeye açılan ve 1998 yılında sulama birliğine devredilen Akıncı Sulaması’nda sulama sistem performansının karşılaştırmalı olarak değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Araştırma alanında yıllık su temini oranı 1.55-1.98, yatırımın geri dönüşüm oranı %56-172, bakım masrafının gelire oranı %2.51-10.82, birim alana düşen toplam işletme, bakım, yönetim masrafı 22.53108.61 $/ha, su dağıtımında istihdam edilen her bir kişiye düşen toplam masraf 1091.09-8658.84 $, su ücreti toplama performansı %70-93, birim alana düşen çalıştırılan personel sayısı 0.007-0.012 kişi/ha, birim sulama alanına karşılık elde edilen gelir 364.81- 557.81 $/ha, sulanan birim alana karşılık elde edilen gelir 1454.292970.46 $/ha, şebekeye alınan birim sulama suyuna karşılık elde edilen gelir 0.106-0.196 $/ m3, tüketilen birim sulama suyuna karşılık elde edilen gelir 1.348-2.887 $/ m olarak belirlenmiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

NALBANTOĞLU, G., ÇAKMAK, B. (2007). Benchmarking of Irrigation Performance in Akıncı Irrigation District. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 03, 213–226. https://ajindex.com/articles/933617

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Anonim, 2005. DSİ’ce İşletilen ve Devredilen Sulama Tesisleri 2004 Yılı Değerlendirme Raporu. DSİ Gn. Md., İşletme ve Bakım Dairesi Başkanlığı, Ankara.
  2. Bekisoglu, M. 1994. Irrigation Development and Operation and Maintenance Problems in Turkey. Proceedings of the Conference on Development of Soil and Water Resources. General Directorate of State Hydraulic Works, Ankara, pp: 579-586.
  3. Beyribey, M. 1997. Devlet Sulama Şebekelerinde Sistem Performansının Değerlendirilmesi. A.Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi Yayın No: 1480, Bilimsel Araştırmalar ve İncelemeler. 813. Ankara Burton, M., D. Molden and Scutsch, J. 2000. Benchmarking Irrigation and Drainage System Perfromance. International Programme on Technology and Research in Irrigation and Drainage (IPTRID), 49p. Çakmak, B.,M. Beyribey, S. Kodal, A.Z. Erözel ve T. Aküzüm, 1995. Sulama Şebekelerinin Kullanıcıya Devri.5.Ulusal Kültürteknik Kongresi Bildirileri, 30 Mart- 2Nisan 1995, s.95-109,
  4. Kemer, Antalya. Çakmak, B. 2002a. Ceylanpınar İkicırcıp Sulama Birliği’nde Sulama Sistem Performansının Değerlendirilmesi. H. Üniv. Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt:7, Sayı:1-2, s.1-9,
  5. Ş.Urfa. Çakmak, B. 2002b. Kızılırmak Havzası Sulama Birliklerinde Sulama Sistem Performansının Değerlendirilmesi. KSÜ Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi, Cilt:5, Sayı:2, s.130-141, K.Maraş. Çakmak,B., M. Beyribey, Y.E. Yıldırım and S. Kodal, 2004. Benchmarking Performance of Irrigation Schemes: A Case Study from Turkey. Irrigation and Drainage, The Journal of the International Commission on Irrigation and Drainage, Vol 53, No:2, p.155-164.
  6. Değirmenci, H. 2001. Devredilen Sulama Şebekelerinin Karşılaştırma Göstergeleri ile Değerlendirilmesi. Uludağ Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, cilt:15, s.31-41,
  7. Bursa. Değirmenci, H., H. Büyükcangaz ve H. Kuşçu, 2003. Assessment of Irrigation with Comparative Indicators in the Southeastern Anatolia Project. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 27(2003), 293-303.
  8. Değirmenci, H., H. Buyukcangaz and H. Merdun, 2006. Assessment of Irrigation Schemes in Turkey with Irrigation Ratio and Relative Water Supply. Technical Note, International Water Resources Association Water International 31(2):259–265.
  9. Ghazalli, M.A. 2004. Benchmarking of Irrigation Projects in Malaysia: Initial Implementation Stages and Preliminary Results. Irrigation and Drainage, The Journal of the International Commission on Irrigation and Drainage, Vol 53, No:2, p.195-212.
  10. Girgin, A., G. Geçgel and S. Gül. 1999. Sulu Tarım Sistemlerindeki Başarıların Ka