Journals / Journal of Agricultural Sciences / 2009 / Cilt: 15 Sayı: 02

Mechanisms of Multiple Resistance, Inheritance, Synergism and Detoxification in Tetranychus urticae Koch Acari: Tetranychidae Resistant to Amitraz

Amitraz’a Dirençli Tetranychus urticae Koch Acari: Tetranychidae ’de Çoklu Direnç, Kalıtım, Sinerjizm ve Detoksifikasyon Mekanizmaları

Pages
148–156
Publication Date
2009-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The kinetic readings with microplate reader pointed significant increases in esterase 2.19 fold , gluthation – S – transferase GST 1.07 fold and cytochrome P450 monooxygenase P450 29.24 fold , enzyme activities in AMT 15 population compared to the parental populations

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The LC values of Tetranychus urticae Koch BEŞ populations collected from Antalya province in bean greenhouse on May 2003 were determined using by spray tower – petri dish method.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The BEŞ population was selected 15 times with amitraz by LC60 values determined for each selected population.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The kinetic readings with microplate reader pointed significant increases in esterase 2.19 fold , gluthation – S – transferase GST 1.07 fold and cytochrome P450 monooxygenase P450 29.24 fold , enzyme activities in AMT 15 population compared to the parental populations
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2003 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Tetranychus urticae · amitraz · çoklu direnç

Abstract

The LC values of Tetranychus urticae Koch BEŞ populations collected from Antalya province in bean greenhouse on May 2003 were determined using by spray tower – petri dish method. The BEŞ population was selected 15 times with amitraz by LC60 values determined for each selected population. The resistant population was named as AMT 15. The resistance rate of this population after 15 selections was found 32.02 fold compared to the susceptible GSS population according to their LC50 values. Different synergists, piperonyl butoxide PBO , triphenyl phosphate TPP and S-benzyl-O,O-diisopropyl phosphorothioate IBP + amitraz were applied to the AMT 15 resistant populations. PBO presented the highest synergistic effect with amitraz in AMT 15 population. The synergistic effects of the other synergists remained limited. Whether multi-resistance developed against some pesticides in the resistant AMT 15 population investigated. The highest multiresistance rate in AMT population was found against abamectin 8.34 fold and propargite 6.37 fold . The only susceptibility in AMT 15 population was determined to bifentrin. The reciprocal crossing investigations revealed the resistance inheritance as incompletely dominant. The kinetic readings with microplate reader pointed significant increases in esterase 2.19 fold , gluthation – S – transferase GST 1.07 fold and cytochrome P450 monooxygenase P450 29.24 fold , enzyme activities in AMT 15 population compared to the parental populations

Özet

Antalya ilinde fasulye serasından Mayıs 2003’de toplanmış olan Tetranychus urticae Koch’nin BEŞ popülasyonuna amitraz ilacı ilaçlama kulesi–petri kabı yöntemi ile uygulanarak LCdeğerleri belirlenmiştir. BEŞ popülasyonu amitraz ile her seleksiyon popülasyonu için belirlenen LC60 değerleriyle 15 kez seleksiyon yapılmıştır. Elde edilen dirençli popülasyon AMT 15 olarak isimlendirilmiştir. LC50değerlerine göre, 15 seleksiyon sonrasında bu popülasyonun hassas GSS popülasyona göre direnç oranı 32.02 kat olarak bulunmuştur. Dirençli AMT 15 popülasyonuna 3 farklı sinerjist, piperonyl butoxide PBO , triphenyl phosphate TPP veya S-benzyl-O,O-diisopropyl phosphorothioate IBP + amitraz uygulanmıştır. Amitraz ile en yüksek sinerjistik etkiyi PBO göstermiştir. Diğerlerinin sinerjistik etkisi sınırlı kalmıştır. AMT 15 popülasyonunun diğer bazı ilaçlara çoklu direnç geliştirip geliştirmediği de incelenmiştir. AMT popülasyonunda en yüksek çoklu direnç oranı abamectin 8.38 kat ve propargite 6.37 kat ’e karşı belirlenmiştir. AMT 15 popülasyonunda yalnızca bifenthrin’e karşı hassasiyet belirlenmiştir. Resiprokal çaprazlama çalışmalarında AMT 15 popülasyonun direnç kalıtımının eksik dominant karakterli olduğu belirlenmiştir. Mikroplate reader ile yapılan kinetik okumalarda AMT 15 popülasyonun da selekte edildikleri BEŞ popülasyonuna göre esteraz 2.19 kat , glutation S–transferase GST 1.07 kat ve sitokrom P450 monooksigenaz P450 29.24 kat enzim aktivitelerinde önemli miktarda artış belirlenmiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

AY, R., KARA, F. E. (2009). Mechanisms of Multiple Resistance, Inheritance, Synergism and Detoxification in Tetranychus urticae Koch Acari: Tetranychidae Resistant to Amitraz. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 02, 148–156. https://ajindex.com/articles/933509

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Ay, R. 2005. Determination of susceptibility and resistance of some greenhouse populations of Tetranychus urticae Koch to chlorpyrifos (dursban 4) by the petri dish-potter tower method. Journal of Pest Science 78: 139-143.
  2. Ay, R., E. Sökeli, İ. Karaca and M. O. Gürkan. 2005. Response to some acaricides of the two-spotted spider mite vegetables in ısparta. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 29: 165-171. Koch) from protected Ay, R. 2006. Antalya ili örtüaltı sebze üretim alanlarında zararlı olan Tetranychus urticae Koch populasyonlarının bazı akarisitlere karşı tepkileri. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 12 (3): 301-306. Anonymous. 2002. Bitki Koruma Ürünleri. TİSİT. Bradford, M. M. 1976. A rapid and sensitiv method for the quantitation of microgramm quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein – dye b inding. Analytical Biochemistry 72: 248-254.
  3. Fergusson-Kolmes, L. A., J., G. Scott and T. J. Dennehy. 1991. Dicofol resistance in Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae): cross-resistance and pharmacokinetics. Journal of Economic Entomology 84: 41-48.
  4. Inoue, K. 1984. Resistance to amitraz in the citrus red mite, Panonychus citri (McGregor) in relation to population genetics. Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology 28: 260-268. Jonsson N. N. and M. Hope. 2007. Progress in the epidemiology and diagnosis of amitraz resistance in the cattle tick Boophilus microplus. Veterinary Parasitology 146: 193-198.
  5. Kabir, K.H. and R. B. Chapman. (1997) Operational and biological factors influencing responses of spider mites (Acari: Tetranychidae) to propargite by using the petri dish - Potter tower method. Journal of Economic Entomology 90:272-277.
  6. Kang, C.Y., G. Wu and T. Miyata. 2006. Synergism of enzyme inhibitors and mechanisms ofinsecticide resistance in Bemisia tabaci. (Gennadius.) (Hom., Aleyrodidae). Journal of Applied Entomology 130: 377 – 385. Kim, Y. J., S. H. Lee, S. W. Lee and Y. J. Ahn. 2004. Fenpyroximate resistance in Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae): Cross-resistance and biochemical resistance mechanisms. Pest Management Science 60: 1001-1006.
  7. Konanz, S. and R. Nauen. 2004. Purification and partial characetrization of a glutathione S-transferase from the two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 79: 49-57. Kumral,N. A. and B. Kovancı. 2007. Susceptibility of female populations of Panonychus ulmi (Koch) (Acari: Tetranychidae) to some acaricides in apple orchards. Journal of Pest Sci