Journals / Journal of Agricultural Sciences / 2018 / Cilt: 24 Sayı: 3

Drainage Water Salt Load Variations Related to the Salinity and Leaching Ratios of Irrigation Water

Pages
394–402
Publication Date
2018-09-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

When discuss the individual ions; while Cl-, (CO3-2+HCO3-) and Ca+2 were accumulated in the soil profile, SO4-2, Na+ ve Mg+2 were leaced from the profile, and all these ions variated by interaction for irrigation waters, and by leaching fractions for the drainage water.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Solubility of salts and leaching fractions have different effects on drainage water quality.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study was carried out with sunflower in PVC soil columns with 40 cm diameter and 115 cm length with 3 different irrigations and 5 irrigation waters with different salinity level.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:When discuss the individual ions; while Cl-, (CO3-2+HCO3-) and Ca+2 were accumulated in the soil profile, SO4-2, Na+ ve Mg+2 were leaced from the profile, and all these ions variated by interaction for irrigation waters, and by leaching fractions for the drainage water.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Irrigation water quality · Drainage water quality management · Solubility of salts

Abstract

Solubility of salts and leaching fractions have different effects on drainage water quality. Knowing the quality of drainage water is extremely important in terms of environmental factors and quality of water resources for the reason that this water is transferred to various sources. In this study, were studied the changes of drainage water salinity and salt load under lyzimeter (soil columns) conditions using different irrigation water salinity and with different leaching fractions. The study was carried out with sunflower in PVC soil columns with 40 cm diameter and 115 cm length with 3 different irrigations and 5 irrigation waters with different salinity level. The three irrigation treatments were 75%, 115% and 135% of the required irrigation water. The irrigation water salinities were 0.25 dS m-1 as control treatment, 1.5 and 3.0 dS m-1 with NaCl+CaCl2 salts and 1.5 and 3.0 dS m-1 with NaCl+CaSO4 salts as saline treatments. In this study investigated drainage water quality variations and salt load with irrigation water and some individual ions load and their leaching by drainage water as well. Drainage water salinities variated with both irrigation water salinity and leaching fractions. It was higher under the effect of soluble salts and with the 15% leaching fraction. However, salt load was higher at 35% leaching fractions level. When discuss the individual ions; while Cl-, (CO3-2+HCO3-) and Ca+2 were accumulated in the soil profile, SO4-2, Na+ ve Mg+2 were leaced from the profile, and all these ions variated by interaction for irrigation waters, and by leaching fractions for the drainage water.

🔖

Cite This Article

YURTSEVEN, E., ÇOLAK, M. S., ÖZTÜRK, A., ÖZTÜRK, H. S. (2018). Drainage Water Salt Load Variations Related to the Salinity and Leaching Ratios of Irrigation Water. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Cilt: 24 Sayı: 3, 394–402. https://ajindex.com/articles/933133

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Anonymous (1993). The determination of inorganic anions in water by ion chromatography; Method 300.0. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio Ayars J E, Christen E W & Hornbuckle J W (2006). Controlled drainage for improved water management in arid regions irrigated agriculture. Agricultural Water Management 86: 128-139 Ayers R S & Westcot D W (1988). Water quality for agriculture. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 29, Rome Bond W J (1998). Soil physical methods for estimating recharge. In: L Zhang & G R Walker (Eds.), The Basics of Recharge and Discharge 3, CSIRO, Melbourne, pp. 17-20
  2. Çiftçi N, Kara M, Yılmaz M & Uğurlu N (1995). Konya Ovasında drenaj suları ile sulanan arazilerde tuzluluk ve sodyumluluk sorunları. 5. Ulusal Kültürteknik Kongresi Bildirileri, 30 Mart-2 Nisan, Antalya, s. 471-481
  3. Heng L K, White R E, Bolan N S & Scotter D R (1991). Leaching losses of major nutrients from a moledrained soil under pasture. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 34: 325-334
  4. Northey J E, Christen E W, Ayars J E & Jankowski J (2006). Occurrence and measurement of salinity stratification in shallow ground water in the Murrumbidgee Irrigation Area, South-Eastern. Agricultural Water Management 81(1-2): 23-40 Oster J D & Rhoades J D (1978). Calculated drainage water compositions and salt burdens resulting from irrigation with river waters in the Western United States. Journal of Environmental Quality 4: 73-79,
  5. Australia Rhoades J D (1983).
  6. Using saline waters for irrigation, In: H S Mann (Ed), Proc. of International Workshop on Salt Affected Soils of Latin America, Maracas, Venezuela, Oct 23-30, 1983, pp. 22-52
  7. Şener S (1993). Ege Bölgesinde lizimetre koşullarında değişik kalitedeki sulama sularının pamuk verimine ve toprak tuz dengesine etkileri. Köy Hizmetleri Menemen Araştırma Enstitüsü Müdürlüğü Yayınları, No: 192, Menemen USSL (1954). Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. (Ed: L A Richards) US Salinity Lab. Agricultural Handbook No: 60 Walker G R, Zhang L, Ellis T W, Hatton T J & Petheram C (2002). Estimating impacts of changed land use on recharge: Review of modelling and other approaches appropriate for management of dry land salinity. Hydrogeology Journal 10(1): 68-90 Wolters W & Bos M G (1990). Interrelationship between irrigation efficiency and the reuse of drainage water. Symposium on Land Drainage for Salinity Control in Arid and Semi-arid Regions, 25 February-2 March 1990
  8. Drainage Research Institute, Cairo, Egypt, p