Journals / Journal of Agricultural Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 25 Sayı: 1

Introducing Different Cherry Cultivars to Inner and Crossover Areas

Pages
11–20
Publication Date
2019-03-13
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Bernard, mid-season cultivar Summit and late season cultivar 0900 Ziraat gave the biggest fruits.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was carried out to evaluate quality, yield and phenology of some sweet cherry cultivars with different maturation periods in Isparta-Egirdir conditions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study was carried out between 2000 and 2011, on Veysel, Précoce Bernard, Star, Venus, Mechlain Haimer, Summit, Techlovan, Fercer Arcina, Sylvia, Noire de Meched, Oktavia, Belge, 0900 Ziraat, Kordia, and Ferbolus.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Bernard, mid-season cultivar Summit and late season cultivar 0900 Ziraat gave the biggest fruits.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Sweet cherry · Prunus avium · Fruit quality

Abstract

This study was carried out to evaluate quality, yield and phenology of some sweet cherry cultivars with different maturation periods in Isparta-Egirdir conditions. The study was carried out between 2000 and 2011, on Veysel, Précoce Bernard, Star, Venus, Mechlain Haimer, Summit, Techlovan, Fercer Arcina, Sylvia, Noire de Meched, Oktavia, Belge, 0900 Ziraat, Kordia, and Ferbolus. Venus, Bernard, Techlovan and Star cultivars were identified as the earliest blooming. Oktavia, Belge, Kordia and 0900 Ziraat cultivars were found to be the latest blooming cultivars. Generally; Veysel, Bernard and Star come to harvest maturity first. Venus, Mechlain Haimer, Summit, Techlovan, Fercer Arcina, Sylvia were found to be middle season cultivars, while N. De Meched, Oktavia, Belge, 0900 Ziraat, Kordia and Ferbolus were found to be the latest. Veysel early cherry cultivar were determined to be the most productive one, while late cultivar N. De Meched and mid-season cultivar Techlovan were also found to be very efficient. In terms of fruit sizes; early sweet cherry cultivar P. Bernard, mid-season cultivar Summit and late season cultivar 0900 Ziraat gave the biggest fruits.

🔖

Cite This Article

SARISU, H., KARAMÜRSEL, Ö. F., ÖZTÜRK, F. P., DEMİRTAŞ, İ., KOÇAL, H., GÜR, İ., CENGİZ, Ö., ŞEVİK, İ. (2019). Introducing Different Cherry Cultivars to Inner and Crossover Areas. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Cilt: 25 Sayı: 1, 11–20. https://ajindex.com/articles/933104

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Anonymous (2012). Crop Production Statistics (online). Turkish Statistical Institute, Ankara. http://www.tuik.gov.tr/bitkiselapp/bitkisel.zul. Visited on February of 2017 Beyhan N & Karakaş B (2009). Investigation of the fertilization biology of some sweet cherry cultivars grown in The Central Northern Anatolian Region of Turkey. Scientia Horticulturae 121(3): 320-326 Chapman P J & Catlin G A (1976). Growth stages in fruit trees-from dormant to fruit set. Plant Science, New York's Food and Life Sciences Bulletin 58: 1-12. Choi C & Andersen R L (2001). Variable fruit set in self-fertile sweet cherry. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 81: 753-760
  2. Crisosto C H, Crisosto G M & Metheney P (2003). Consumer acceptance of ‘Brooks’ and ‘Bing’ cherries is mainly dependent on fruit SSC and visual skin color. Postharvest Biology and Technology 28: 159-167 Drake S R & Fellman J K (1987). Indicators of maturity and storage quality of Rainier sweet cherry Indicateurs de maturité et d'aptitude à l'entreposage des cerises douces Rainier. HortScience 22(2): 283-285 Drake S R & Elfving D C (2002). Indicators of maturity and storage quality of ‘Lapins’ sweet cherry. HortTechnology 12(4): 687-690
  3. Ekinci N, Delice A, Gür E & Özdüven F (2007). Değişik dozlarda kalsiyum uygulamalarının 0900 Ziraat kiraz çeşidinin kalite kriterleri üzerine etkileri, Türkiye V. Ulusal Bahçe Bitkileri Kongresi Bildiriler: 4-7
  4. Eylül, Erzurum, s. 464-468 Fadón E, Herrero M & Rodrigo J (2015). Flower development in sweet cherry framed in the BBCH scale. Scientia Horticulturae 192: 141-147
  5. FAO (2015). Food and Agriculture Organization of The United Nations. Visited on February of 2017. http://faostat.fao.org
  6. Fischer R R, Von Elbe J H, Schuler R T, Bruhn H D & Moore J D (1996). Some physical properties of sour cherries. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 175-179
  7. Gonçalves B, Moutinho-Pereira J, Santos A, Silva A P, Bacelar E, Correia C & Rosa E (2006). Scion-rootstock interaction affects the physiology and fruit quality of sweet cherry. Tree Physiology 26(1): 93-104 Grzyb Z S & Rozpara E (2009). Effect of various rootstocks and tree spacing on the size of Vanda. Acta Horticulturae 814: 401-404
  8. Ipek A, Gulen H, Akçay M E., Ipek M, Ergin S & Eris A (2011). Determination of self-incompatibility groups of Sweet Cherry Genotypes from Turkey. Genetics and Molecular Research 10(1): 253-260
  9. Kappel F, Fisher–Fleming B & Hogue E (1996). Fruit characteristics and sensory a