Journals / Journal of Agricultural Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 27 Sayı: 1

Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) Fails Barcoding of the Genus Neotinea Rchb.f. (Orchidaceae)

Pages
69–75
Publication Date
2021-03-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that ITS separated some N. tridentata samples of Turkish, Greek, Hungarian and Croatian samples from the others on the phylogenetic trees due to the incomplete lineage sorting.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) is one of the most used barcoding regions for the molecular phylogenetics and barcoding of orchids.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Phylogenetic trees were regenerated by using Maximum Parsimony approach.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that ITS separated some N. tridentata samples of Turkish, Greek, Hungarian and Croatian samples from the others on the phylogenetic trees due to the incomplete lineage sorting.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:accD-psaI marker · orchids · DNA barcoding

Abstract

Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) is one of the most used barcoding regions for the molecular phylogenetics and barcoding of orchids. Our aim in this study is to test the reliability of ITS on barcoding of closely related Neotinea spp., including Neotinea tridentata, Neotinea ustulata subsp. ustulata and Neotinea ustulata subsp. aestivalis, by comparing it to the accD-psaI intergenic spacer of the plastid DNA. Both ITS and accD-psaI regions were amplified by specific primer sets and sequenced. Phylogenetic trees were regenerated by using Maximum Parsimony approach. The results showed that ITS separated some N. tridentata samples of Turkish, Greek, Hungarian and Croatian samples from the others on the phylogenetic trees due to the incomplete lineage sorting. In contrast to ITS, the accD-psaI marker could successfully separate N. tridentata and N. ustulata samples according to a priori species classification. Our findings refer to a hybridisation story between some N. tridentata and N. ustulata. We propose not to use ITS sequences directly as a barcode and to reconstruct the phylogeny of the Neotinea group. Instead, the inclusion of other nuclear regions such as LFY, ADH, etc., or utilisation of whole genome sequencing could give better barcoding results.

🔖

Cite This Article

HÜRKAN, K., TAŞKIN, K. M. (2021). Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) Fails Barcoding of the Genus Neotinea Rchb.f. (Orchidaceae). Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Cilt: 27 Sayı: 1, 69–75. https://ajindex.com/articles/933034

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Álvarez, I., Wendel, J.F. (2003) Ribosomal ITS sequences and plant phylogenetic inference. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 29: 417–434. doi: 10.1016/S1055-7903(03)00208-2
  2. Bailey, C. (2003) Characterization of angiosperm nrDNA polymorphism, paralogy, and pseudogenes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 29: 435–455. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2003.08.021 Baldwin, B.G., Sanderson, M.J., Porter, J.M., Wojciechowski, M.F., Campbell, C.S. & Donoghue, M.J. (1995) The its Region of Nuclear Ribosomal DNA: A Valuable Source of Evidence on Angiosperm Phylogeny. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 82: 247–277.
  3. Bateman, R.M., Hollingsworth, P.M., Preston, J., YI-BO, L., Pridgeon, A.M. & Chase, M.W. (2003) Molecular phylogenetics and evolution of Orchidinae and selected Habenariinae (Orchidaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 142: 1–40. doi: 10.1046/j.1095-8339.2003.00157.x Chase, M.W., Fay, M.F. & Savolainen, V. (2000) Higher-level classification in the angiosperms: new insights from the perspective of DNA sequence data. Taxon 49: 685–704.
  4. Nieto-Feliner, G.N. & Rosselló, J.A. (2007) Better the devil you know? Guidelines for insightful utilization of nrDNA ITS in species-level evolutionary studies in plants. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 44: 911–919. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2007.01.013 Fuertes Aguilar, J. & Nieto-Feliner, G. (2003) Additive polymorphisms and reticulation in an ITS phylogeny of thrifts (Armeria, Plumbaginaceae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 28: 430–447. doi: 10.1016/S1055-7903(02)00301-9 Gulyás, G., Sramkó, G., Molnár, V.A. & et al. (2005) Nuclear ribosomal DNA ITS paralogs as evidence of recent interspecific hybridization in the genus Ophrys (Orchidaceae). Acta Biologica Cracoviensia Series Botanica 47: 61–67.
  5. Hollingsworth, P.M. (2008) DNA barcoding plants in biodiversity hot spots: progress and outstanding questions. Heredity (Edinb) 101: 1–2. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2008.16 Hollingsworth, P.M., Graham, S.W. & Little, D.P. (2011) Choosing and Using a Plant DNA Barcode. PLoS One 6:e19254. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019254 Kearse, M., Moir, R., Wilson, A. & et al. (2012) Geneious Basic: An integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28: 1647–1649. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199 Kim, S.T. & Donoghue, M.J. (2008) Incongruence between cpDNA and nrITS trees indicates extensive hybridization within Eupersicaria (Polygonaceae). American Journal of Botany 95