Journals / Journal of Agricultural Sciences / 2022 / Cilt: 28 Sayı: 3

An efficient Regeneration Protocol for in vitro Direct Organogenesis in Einkorn (Triticum monococcum L.) Wheat

Pages
412–422
Publication Date
2022-09-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

A highly efficient regeneration protocol for einkorn wheat was developed using somatic tissue as an explant source for the first time.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Coleoptile, leaf, and root explants of the einkorn (Triticum monococcum ssp. monococcum) were cultured in vitro to obtain an efficient plant regeneration protocol through direct shoot formation by using different combinations and concentrations of various plant growth regulators.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 180 different auxin and cytokinin combinations were tested for regeneration.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:A highly efficient regeneration protocol for einkorn wheat was developed using somatic tissue as an explant source for the first time.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Coleoptile · direct regeneration protocol · tissue culture

Abstract

Coleoptile, leaf, and root explants of the einkorn (Triticum monococcum ssp. monococcum) were cultured in vitro to obtain an efficient plant regeneration protocol through direct shoot formation by using different combinations and concentrations of various plant growth regulators. A total of 180 different auxin and cytokinin combinations were tested for regeneration. Shoot formation was not observed with the root and leaf explants. Shoot formation was obtained only from the coleoptile explants, with a mean of 1.20±0.24 shoots/explant and 86.60% of shoot formation frequency and with a 1.20±0.53 shoots/explant and 80.00% shoot formation frequency on medium supplemented with 0.5 mg L-1 TDZ and 1 mg L-1 TDZ plus 1 mg L-1 NAA, respectively. The shoots were subcultured on the MS medium containing the most effective hormonal combination concurrently continued to shoot and root formation for 45 days. It is noteworthy that 3.66±0.66 shoots per explant were induced by MS, which contained 1 mg L-1 TDZ plus 1 mg L-1 NAA and 2.0 mg L-1 KIN plus 0.5 mg L-1 NAA for 45 days. Of the different auxin concentrations tested for rooting, 2.0 mg L-1 IAA was predominant, with the greatest number of roots (12.33±0.88) produced per regenerated shoot. Finally, these well-developed plantlets were acclimatized with a 100% success rate and were transferred to the ex vitro conditions. A highly efficient regeneration protocol for einkorn wheat was developed using somatic tissue as an explant source for the first time.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞAHİN, G., ÖRGEÇ, M., ZENCİRCİ, N. (2022). An efficient Regeneration Protocol for in vitro Direct Organogenesis in Einkorn (Triticum monococcum L.) Wheat. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Cilt: 28 Sayı: 3, 412–422. https://ajindex.com/articles/932954

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Alikina OM, Chernobrovkina S, Dolgov, Miroshnichenko D (2010) Tissue culture efficiency of wheat species with different genomic formulas. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology 16: 307-314.
  2. Benlioğlu B, Birsin MA (2017) A thidizuron (TDZ) – based efficient plant regeneration system from callus cultures, obtanined through various embryo sources, in common winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Ciência e Técnica Vitivinícola 32:108-119.
  3. Charriere F, Sotta B, Emile M, Günther H (1999) Induction of adventitious shoots or somatic embryos on in vitro cultured zygotic embryos of Helianthus annuus: variation of endogenous hormone levels. Plant Physiol Biochem 37:751–757.
  4. Dale PJ, Deambrogio E (1979) A Comparison of callus induction and plant regeneration from different explants of Hordeum vulgare. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenphysiologie 94: 65-77.
  5. Ekmekci H, Aasim M (2014) In vitro plant regeneration of Turkish sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum). The Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences 24(6)1758-1765.
  6. Goncharov NP (2011) Genus Triticum L. taxonomy: the present and the future. Plant Systematics and Evolution 295: 1-11.
  7. Gurel E, Wren MJ (1995) In vitro development from leaf explants of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) Rhizogenesis and the effect of sequential exposure to auxin and cytokinin. Ann Bot 75:31–38.
  8. Hassan MU, Ahmed Z, Munir M, Malik SI, Shahzad K (2009) Effect of sorbitol in callus induction and plant regeneration in wheat. African J Biotechnol 8(23): 6529- 6535. Hidalgoa A, Andrea BA, Pompeia C, Piscozzia R (2006) Carotenoids and tocols of einkorn wheat (Triticum monococcum ssp. monococcum L.). Journal of Cereal Science 44: 182–193.
  9. Kilinc M (2004) Effects of dicamba concentration on the embryo cultures of some bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip 58-61.
  10. Kopertekh LG, Stribnaya A (2003) Regeneration from wheat leaf explants. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology 50(3): 365-369.
  11. Lazar MD, Collins GB, Vian WE (1983) Genetic and environmental effects on the growth and differentiation of wheat somatic cell cultures. Journal of Heredity 74: 353-357.
  12. Longin CF, Reif JC (2014) Redesigning the exploitation of wheat genetic resources. Trends in Plant Science 19: 631-636.
  13. Mahmood IA, Razzaq Z, Khan I, Hafiz A, Kaleem S (2012) Evaluation of tissue culture responses of promising wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars and development of an efficient regeneration system. Pakistan J Bot 44: 277-284.
  14. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for