Journals / Journal of Agricultural Sciences / 2022 / Cilt: 28 Sayı: 4

A Novel Machine Learning Approach: Soil Temperature Ordinal Classification (STOC)

Pages
635–649
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was observed from the experimental results that the STOC.DT method achieved the best soil temperature level prediction among the others.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Soil temperature prediction is an important task since soil temperature plays an important role in agriculture and land use.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach, the STOC method using five different traditional machine learning methods (Decision Tree, Naive Bayes, K-Nearest Neighbors, Support Vector Machines, and Random Forest) was applied on daily values of meteorological and soil data obtained from 16 stations in three states (Utah, Alabama, and New Mexico) of United States at five soil depths (2, 4, 8, 20, and 40 inches) between the years of 2011 and 2020.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was observed from the experimental results that the STOC.DT method achieved the best soil temperature level prediction among the others.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:agriculture · classification · decision tree

Abstract

Soil temperature prediction is an important task since soil temperature plays an important role in agriculture and land use. Although some progress has been made in this area, the existing methods provide a regression or nominal classification task. However, ordinal classification is yet to be explored. To bridge the gap, this paper proposes a novel approach: Soil Temperature Ordinal Classification (STOC), which considers the relationships between the class labels during soil temperature level prediction. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach, the STOC method using five different traditional machine learning methods (Decision Tree, Naive Bayes, K-Nearest Neighbors, Support Vector Machines, and Random Forest) was applied on daily values of meteorological and soil data obtained from 16 stations in three states (Utah, Alabama, and New Mexico) of United States at five soil depths (2, 4, 8, 20, and 40 inches) between the years of 2011 and 2020. The experiments show that the proposed STOC approach is an efficient method for soil temperature level (very low, low, medium, high, and very high) prediction. The applied STOC models (STOC.DT, STOC.NB, STOC.KNN, STOC.SVM, and STOC.RF) showed average accuracy rates of 90.95%, 77.09%, 90.84%, 89.94%, and 90.91% on the experimental datasets, respectively. It was observed from the experimental results that the STOC.DT method achieved the best soil temperature level prediction among the others.

🔖

Cite This Article

KÜÇÜK, C., BİRANT, D., TAŞER, P. Y. (2022). A Novel Machine Learning Approach: Soil Temperature Ordinal Classification (STOC). Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Cilt: 28 Sayı: 4, 635–649. https://ajindex.com/articles/932936

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Abimbola O P, Meyer G E, Mittlstet A R, Rudnick D R & Franz T E (2021). Knowledge-guided machine learning for improving daily soil temperature prediction across the United States. Vadose Zone Journal e20151: 1-18 https://doi.org/10.1002/vzj2.20151
  2. Abyaneh H Z, Varkeshi M B, Golmohammadi G & Mohammadi K (2016). Soil temperature estimation using an artificial neural network and co-active neuro-fuzzy inference system in two different climates. Arabian Journal of Geosciences 9(2016): 1-9 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-016-2388-8
  3. Alizamir M, Kim S, Kermani M Z, Heddam S, Shahrabadi A H & Gharabaghi B (2020b). Modelling daily soil temperature by hydro‑meteorological data at different depths using a novel data‑intelligence model: deep echo state network model. Artificial Intelligence Review 102: 1-28 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-020-09915-5
  4. Alizamir M, Kisi O, Ahmed A N, Mert C, Fai C M, Kim S, Kim N W & Shafie A E (2020a). Advanced machine learning model for better prediction accuracy of soil temperature at different depths. PLOS ONE 15(4): 1-25 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231055
  5. Bayatvarkeshi M, Bhagat S K, Mohammadi K, Kisi O, Farahani M, Hasani A, Deo R & Yaseen Z M (2021). Modeling soil temperature using air temperature features in diverse climatic conditions with complementary machine learning models. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 185: 1-15 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2021.106158
  6. Bonakdari H, Moeeni H, Ebtehaj I, Zeynoddin M, Mahoammadian A & Gharabaghi B (2019). New insights into soil temperature time series modeling: linear or nonlinear? Theoretical and Applied Climatology 135: 1157-1177 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-018-2436-2
  7. Citakoglu H (2017). Comparison of artificial intelligence techniques for prediction of soil temperatures in Turkey. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 130: 545-556 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-016-1914-7
  8. Delbari M, Sharifazari S & Mohammadi E (2019). Modeling daily soil temperature over diverse climate conditions in Iran—a comparison of multiple linear regression and support vector regression techniques. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 135: 991-1001 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-018-2370-3
  9. Feng Y, Cui N, Hao W, Gao L & Gong D (2019). Estimation of soil temperature from meteorological data using different machine learning models. Geoderma 338(2019): 67-77 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.11.044 Frank E & Hall M (2001). A simple approach to ordinal classification. In: European Conference on