Journals / Journal of Agricultural Sciences / 2023 / Cilt: 29 Sayı: 1

Determination of the Seed Yield and Quality Characteristics of Some Advanced- Generation Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Lines

Pages
142–148
Publication Date
2023-01-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was also determined that the PS1 line is a good cultivar candidate especially, in terms of seed yield.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was conducted to determine the seed yield, yield components, and seed quality values of some field pea genotypes grown under Bursa ecological conditions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The trials were carried out at Bursa Uludag University, Faculty of Agriculture, Agricultural Research and Application Center in the years 2013-2014 and 2015-2016.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was also determined that the PS1 line is a good cultivar candidate especially, in terms of seed yield.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013-2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Genotypes · Plant height · 1000-seed weight

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the seed yield, yield components, and seed quality values of some field pea genotypes grown under Bursa ecological conditions. The trials were carried out at Bursa Uludag University, Faculty of Agriculture, Agricultural Research and Application Center in the years 2013-2014 and 2015-2016. The present study was conducted with three replications according to the randomized complete block design. The 7 pea lines (PS1, PS2, PS3, PS4, PS5, PS6, PS7) and Golyazi cultivar were used as the plant material. These lines were obtained as a result of the hybridization studies that were started in 2007. The Golyazi cultivar, which was developed by Bursa Uludag University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Field Crops, was used as the control cultivar. In this study, plant height, the number of pods per plant, the number of seeds per pod, the number of seeds per plant, 1000-seed weight, seed yield, crude protein ratio, and crude protein yield were determined. PS1 line gave the highest values in terms of 1000-seed weight (288.87 g), seed yield (3336.3 kg/ha), and crude protein yield (619.1 kg/ha) based on two-year results. It was also determined that the PS1 line is a good cultivar candidate especially, in terms of seed yield.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞENBEK, G., HALİL, D., UZUN, A., ACIKGOZ, E. (2023). Determination of the Seed Yield and Quality Characteristics of Some Advanced- Generation Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Lines. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Cilt: 29 Sayı: 1, 142–148. https://ajindex.com/articles/932909

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Ada R, Ceyhan E, Celik S A, Harmankaya M & Ozcan M M (2019). Fatty acid compo-sition and mineral contents of pea genotype seeds. Iranian Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering (IJCCE) 38: 153-158
  2. Ambika S, Manonmani V & Somasundaram G (2014). Review on effect of seed size on seedling vigour and seed yield. Research Journal of Seed Science 7(2): 31-38
  3. Anonymous (2020).
  4. TUIK, Crop production statistics. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Kategori/GetKategori?p=tarim-111&dil=1 (Access date: 01.03.2021)
  5. Anonymous (2021).
  6. TTSM, National variety list. https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/BUGEM/TTSM/Menu/30/Kayit-Listeleri (Access date: 10.08.2021)
  7. Anonymous (2016).
  8. Ministry of Agriculture and Foresty, General Directorate of Mete-orology, Unpublished records. Anwar R A, Jalal O A & Sarkawth A A (2014). Study five genotypes of pea (Pisum sativum L.) in terms of yield and yield components under conditions Sulaymanyah-Bakrajo. International Journal of Engineering and Technology Research 2:18-22
  9. Arevalo L S, Oosterhuis D M, Coker D & Brown R S (2008). Physiological response of cotton to high night temperature. Physiological Response of Cotton to High Tempe-ratures 2: 63- 68 Biarnés-Dumoulin V, Denis J B, Lejeune-Héanut I & Etévé G (1996). Interpreting yi-eld instability in pea using genotypic and environmental covariates. Crop Science 36: 15-120
  10. Bitew Y, Asargew F & Beshir O (2014). Effect of plant spacing on the yield and yield component of field pea (Pisum sativum L.) at Adet, North Western Ethiopia. Agri-culture, Forestry and Fisheries 3(5): 368-373
  11. Cacan E, Kaplan M, Kokten K & Tutar H (2018). Evaluation of some forage pea (Pi-sum sativum ssp. arvense L.) lines and cultivars in terms of seed yield and straw qua-lity. Igdır Üniversity Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology 8(2): 275-284
  12. Celis-Diez J L, Bustamante R O & Vásquez R A (2004). Assessing frequency-dependent seed size selection: a field experiment. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 81: 307-312
  13. Ceyhan E (2003). Determination of some agricultural characters and their heredity through linextester method in pea parents and crosses. PhD Thesis, Selcuk Univer-sity, Konya, Turkey Egli D B & Bruening W P (2002). Flowering and fruit set dynamics at phloem‐isolated nodes in soybean. Field Crops Research 79: 9-19 DOI: 10.1016/S0378 4290(02)00016-3
  14. Gan Y P Jayakumar, Zentner R P & McDonald C L (2006). Selection for seed size and its impact on grain yield and quality in kabuli chickpea. Canadian Journal of