SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türkiye Entomoloji Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 4

Lethal effects of four insecticides on immature stages of Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) in laboratory conditions

Laboratuvar şartlarında Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) (Stephens)'nın ergin öncesi dönemleri uzerine dört insektisitin öldürücü etkileri

Aida AYUBI
Gholamhossein MORAVVEJ
Javad KARIMI
Pages
399–408
Publication Date
2013-08-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The use of thiametoxam should be carefully evaluated if employed in combination with C. carnea in IPM programs

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) is a general biocontrol agent of several insect pests in greenhouses.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The lethal effects of four compounds, imidacloprid, lufenuron, thiametoxam and thiodicarb, on the eggs and 1st instar larvae of C. carnea were studied in laboratory conditions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The use of thiametoxam should be carefully evaluated if employed in combination with C. carnea in IPM programs
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Chrysoperla carnea · imidacloprid · lufenuron

Abstract

Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) is a general biocontrol agent of several insect pests in greenhouses. The lethal effects of four compounds, imidacloprid, lufenuron, thiametoxam and thiodicarb, on the eggs and 1st instar larvae of C. carnea were studied in laboratory conditions. Dipping bioassay tests were used for eggs and the residual contact method for larvae. Positive relationships were detected between the concentrations of insecticides and mortality rates of various stages. However, there were considerable variations in toxicity of insecticides. Thiodicarb had no effect on eggs, whereas thiametoxam with an LC50 value of 1.90 μg ai. L-1 showed the highest ovicidal activity. On larvae, thiametoxam was the most toxic (LC50= 0.55 μg ai. L-1) and lufenuron proved to be the least toxic (LC50 = 44.02 μg ai. L-1). The use of thiametoxam should be carefully evaluated if employed in combination with C. carnea in IPM programs

Özet

Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) seralarda birkaç zararlıyı kontrol altinda tutan genel bir biyolojik savaş ajanıdır. Imidacloprid, lufenuron, thiametoxam ve thiodicarb olmak uzere dört bilesigin oldurucu etkileri C. carnea’nın yumurta ve birinci dönem larvaları üzerinde, laboratuvar koşullarında denenmiştir. Bioassay testlerde yumurta için daldırma yöntemi, larvalar için rezidüel kontakt metodu kullanılmıştır. İnsektisitlerin konsantrasyonları ile degisik donemlerin ölüm oranları arasinda pozitif bir ilişki belirlenmiştir. Ancak, insektisitlerin toksisitesinde önemli farklılıklar görülmüştür. Thiodicarb yumurta üzerinde etkili olmamis, thiametoxam ise 1.90 μg ai. L-1 LC50 değeriyle en yüksek ovisidal etkiyi göstermiştir. Larvalar üzerinde, thiametoxam en zehirli (LC50 = 0.55 ug ai. L-1) ve lufenuronun en az zehirli olduğu kanıtlanmıştır (LC50 = 44.02 mg ai. L-1). Thiametoxamin IPM programlarında C. carnea ile kombinasyon halinde kullanılma durumu dikkatli bir şekilde değerlendirilmelidir

🔖

Cite This Article

AYUBI, A., MORAVVEJ, G., KARIMI, J. (2013). Lethal effects of four insecticides on immature stages of Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) in laboratory conditions. Türkiye Entomoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 4, 399–408. https://ajindex.com/articles/93164

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Abbot, W. S. 1925. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. Journal of Economic Entomology,18: 265- 267. Ayubi, A., Darsuye, R., Moravvej, Gh. & Karimi, J. 2010. Molecular characterization of an Iranian population of Chrysoperla carnea Stephens (Neu.: Chrysopidae) using COI sequence. Proceedings of the 1st Iranian Pest Management Conference(IPMC), 29 June-1 July, Kerman, Iran. 402 pp. Bartlett, B. R. 1964. Toxicity of some pesticides to eggs, larvae, and adults of the green lacewing, Chrysoperla carnea. Journal of Economic Entomology, 57: 366-369.
  2. Biddinger, D. J. & Hull, L. A. 1995. Effects of several types of insecticides on the mite predator, Stethorus punctum (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), including insect growth regulators and abamectin. Journal of Economic Entomology, 88: 358-366.
  3. Buchholz, A. & Nauen, R. 2002. Translocation and translaminar bioavailability of two neonicotinoids insecticides after foliar application to cabbage and cotton. Journal of Pest Science, 58: 10–16.
  4. Bueno, A. F. & Freitas, S. 2004. A review for effect of the insecticides abemactin and lufenuron on eggs and larvae of Chrysoperla carnea Stephens (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) under laboratory conditions. BioControl, 49: 227- 283. Carvalho, G.A., Carvatho, C.F. & Olveira, C.M. 1998. Efeito de reguladores de crescimento de insetos e do fungicida Captan sobre ovos de Chrysoperla externa (Hagen, 1861) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Journal of Ciência e Agrotecnologia, 22: 476-482.
  5. Corrales, N. & Campos, M. 2004. Populations, longevity, mortality and fecundity of Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) from olive-orchards with different agricultural management systems. Chemosphere, 57: 1613– 1619. Croft, B. A. 1990. Arthropod Biological Control Agents and Pesticides. John Wiley, New York, 723 pp. Elbert, A., Nauen, R. & Leicht, W. 1998. Imidacloprid, a novel chloronicotinyl insecticides: biological activity and agriculture importance. In: I. Ishaya and D. Degheele (eds), Insecticides with Novel Mode of Action, Mechanism and Application. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. pp. 50-73.
  6. Finney, D. L. 1971. Probit analysis. Cambridge University Press,
  7. Cambridge. Fournet, F., Sannier, C., Moriniere, M., Porcheron, P. & Monteny, N. 1995. Effects of two insect growth regulators on ecdysteroid production in Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae), Journal of Medical Entomology, 32: 588–593.
  8. Graf, J. F. 1993. The role of insect growth regulators in arthropod control, Parasitology Today, 9: 471–47