Journals / Türkiye Entomoloji Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 3

Evaluation of entomopathogenic fungi, Purpureocillium lilacinum TR1 for the control of the Root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne javanica, M. incognita and M. arenaria)

Entomopatojen fungus, Purpureocillium lilacinum TR1’in kök-ur nematodlarının (Meloidogyne javanica, M. incognita ve M. arenaria) mücadelesinde etkinliği

Pages
311–318
Publication Date
2015-06-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Numbers of nematodes were decreased by increasing the inoculum level of the entomopatogenic fungi. 108 cfu concentrations of Purpureocillium lilacinum TR1 were found more effective then other concentrations applied.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Root-knot nematodes (RKNs) (Nematoda: Meloidogynidae) are one of the major pests of the vegetables causing losses in crop production by forming knots on the roots.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Because of commercial nematicides are highly toxic to environment and human health, alternative control strategies are needed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Numbers of nematodes were decreased by increasing the inoculum level of the entomopatogenic fungi. 108 cfu concentrations of Purpureocillium lilacinum TR1 were found more effective then other concentrations applied.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kök-ur nematodları · Purpureocillium lilacinum · entomopatojen

Abstract

Root-knot nematodes (RKNs) (Nematoda: Meloidogynidae) are one of the major pests of the vegetables causing losses in crop production by forming knots on the roots. RKNs are generally seen in the greenhouse vegetable production areas of the coastal regions of Turkey. Because of commercial nematicides are highly toxic to environment and human health, alternative control strategies are needed. One of effective and environmental friendly methods is using entomopathogen fungi (EPFs) against nematodes. In this study, a potential biological control agents, Turkish isolate of EPF, Purpureocillium lilacinum TR1 (syn: Paecilomyces lilacinus (Thom) Luangsa-ard, Houbraken, Hywel-Jones & Samson) (Hypocreales: Ophiocordycipitaceae) was evaluated to control three species [Meloidogyne arenaria (Neal) Chitwood, M. incognita (Kofoid & White) Chitwood and M. javanica (Treub) Chitwood] of RKNs. Experiments were conducted in plastic pots, 1000 J2s and 3000 eegs of RKNs were applied to 2 cm deep holes in the pots. The serial dilutions of P. lilacinum conidia were prepared 106, 107 and 108 cfu ml-1 concentrations under haemocytometer. The two controls were pots with RKN eggs or J2s (positive control), and no RKN (negative control). Bioassays were replicated (pots) five times for each treatment. Total number of egg masses for each plant, plant height, fresh and dry weight of the upper parts of plants and fresh and dry root weight were recorded. Numbers of nematodes were decreased by increasing the inoculum level of the entomopatogenic fungi. 108 cfu concentrations of Purpureocillium lilacinum TR1 were found more effective then other concentrations applied.

Özet

Kök-ur nematod ları (KUN) (Nematoda: Meloidogynidae)’ları sebzelerin en önemli zararlılarındandır. Türkiye’de daha çok kıyı kesimlerinde seralarda yetiştirilen sebzelerde daha çok ve yoğun olarak görülmektedir. Ticari nematisitler çevre ve insan sağlığına yüksek oranda toksik olduklarından alternatif mücadele yöntemlerine ihtiyaç vardır. Bu metotlar arasında en etkili ve çevre dostu olan yöntemler içerisinde entomopatojen fungus (EPF)’ların kullanımı önemli bir yer tutmaktadır. Bu çalışmada KUN [Meloidogyne arenaria (Neal) Chitwood, M. incognita (Kofoid & White) Chitwood ve M. javanica (Treub) Chitwood]’lerin mücadelesinde Purpureocillium lilacinum TR1 (syn: Paecilomyces lilacinus (Thom) Luangsa-ard, Houbraken, Hywel-Jones & Samson) (Hypocreales: Ophiocordycipitaceae)’in Türk izolatının kullanım olanağı değerlendirilmiştir. Denemeler plastik saksılarda yürütülmüş ve KUN’lerin 3000 yumurta ve 1000 L2 dönemleri toprağın 2 cm derinliğine uygulanmıştır. P. ilacinum, hemasitometrede 106, 107 ve 108 cfu ml-1 konsantrasyonda konidi sayımları yapılarak hazırlanmıştır. Pozitif kontrol KUN yumurtaları veya L2’leri içermekte, negatif kontrol de ise KUN bulunmamaktadır. Denemeler her uygulama için 5 tekerrürlü olarak yürütülmüştür. Her bitkideki toplam yumurta sayısı, bitki uzunluğu, bitki üst kısımlarının kuru ve yaş ağırlığı ile kök yaş ve kuru ağırlığı kaydedilmiştir. Deneme sonuçlarına göre nematod sayısı inokulum yoğunluğunun artışına bağlı olarak azalmıştır. Purpureocillium lilacinum TR1‘in 108 cfu konsantrasyonu diğer konsantrasyonlardan daha etkili bulunmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

KEPENEKÇİ, İ., OKSAL, E. (2015). Evaluation of entomopathogenic fungi, Purpureocillium lilacinum TR1 for the control of the Root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne javanica, M. incognita and M. arenaria). Türkiye Entomoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 3, 311–318. https://ajindex.com/articles/93163

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Ahmad, S. F. & T. A. Khan, 2004. Management of root knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita, by integration of Paecilomyces lilacinus with organic metarials in Chilli. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection, 37: 35-40.
  2. Atkins, S. D., I. M. Clark, Pande, S., Hirsch P. R. & B. R. Kerry, 2005. The use of real-time PCR and species-specific primers for the identification and monitoring of Paecilomyces lilacinus. Federation of European Microbiological Societies Microbiology Ecology, 51: 257-264.
  3. Cabanillas, E. & K. R. Barker, 1989. Impact of Paecilomyces lilacinus inoculum level and application time on control of Meloidogyne incognita on tomato. Journal of Nematology, 21: 115-120.
  4. Cannayane, I. & C. V. Sivakumar, 2001. Evaluation of Paecilomyces lilacinus (strain PL-nilgiris) against Meloidogyne incognita in Chilli (Capsicum annuum L.). Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, 40: 76-78.
  5. Davide, R. G., 1990. “Biological control of nematotes using Paecilomyces lilacinus in the Philippines, 156-163”. In: Integrated Pest Management for Tropical Root and Tuber Crops: Proceedings of the Global Status of and Prospects for Integrated Pest Management of Root and Tuber Crops in the Tropics (25-30 October 1987, Nigeria), International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, 235 pp. Daykin, M. E. & R. S. Hussey, 1985. “Staining and histopathological techniques in nematology, 39-48”. In: An advanced treatise on Meloidogyne Volume II: Methodology (Eds: K. R. Barker, C. C. Carter & J. N. Sasser). North Carolina State University Graphics, North Carolina, USA, 223 pp. Dube, B. & G. C. Smart, 1987. Biological control of Meloidogyne incognita by Paecilomyces lilacinus and Pasteuria penetrans. Journal of Nematology,19: 222–227.
  6. Eisenback, J. D. & H. H. Triantaphyllou, 1991. “Root-knot nematotes: Meloidogyne species and races, 281–286”. In: Manual of Agricultural Nematology (Ed: W. R. Nickle). Marcel Dekker, New York, USA, 1064 pp. Elekcioğlu, İ. H. & N. Uygun, 1994. “Occurrence And Distribution Of Plant Parasitic Nematodes In Cash Crops In Eastern Mediterranean Region Of Türkiye, 409-410", Proceedings of 9th Congress of the Mediterranean Phytopathological Union (18-24 Eylül 1994,
  7. Aydın, Türkiye), Turkish Phytopathological Society, 567 pp. Hashem, M. & K. A. Abo-Elyousr, 2011. Management of the root knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita on tomato with combination of different biocontrol organisms. Crop Protection, 30: 285-292.
  8. Hussey, R. S. & K. R. Barker, 1973. A comparison of metho