SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türkiye Entomoloji Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 4

Orientation of some Heterorhabditis bacteriophora (Poinar, 1976) (Rhabditida: Heterorhabditidae) strains to Lolium perenne L. (Poales: Poaceae) and Galleria mellonella (L., 1758) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae)

Bazı Heterorhabditis bacteriophora (Poinar, 1976) (Rhabditida: Heterorhabditidae) ırklarının Lolium perenne L. (Poales: Poaceae) ve Galleria mellonella (L., 1758) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae)'ya yönelimi

Sema YILDIRIM
Yavuz Selim ŞAHIN
Alper SUSURLUK
Pages
409–416
Publication Date
2019-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicated that for combination A, most orientation to plants and larvae was seen in HB1138; for combination B, most orientation to plant roots was was seen in HBH; and for combination C, strain HB4 showed the most orientation to mechanically damaged plant roots.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs) have different host-finding (foraging) behavior that varies from species to species.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the present study, the orientation of some Heterorhabditis bacteriophora (Poinar, 1976) (Rhabditida: Heterorhabditidae) strains to perennial ryegrass Lolium perenne L. (Poales: Poaceae) roots and greater wax moth Galleria mellonella (L., 1758) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) larvae were investigated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicated that for combination A, most orientation to plants and larvae was seen in HB1138; for combination B, most orientation to plant roots was was seen in HBH; and for combination C, strain HB4 showed the most orientation to mechanically damaged plant roots.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Entomopatojen nematodlar · İngiliz çimi · yönelim

Abstract

Entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs) have different host-finding (foraging) behavior that varies from species to species. Besides their foraging behavior, the orientation of some EPNs can vary depending on plant roots. In the present study, the orientation of some Heterorhabditis bacteriophora (Poinar, 1976) (Rhabditida: Heterorhabditidae) strains to perennial ryegrass Lolium perenne L. (Poales: Poaceae) roots and greater wax moth Galleria mellonella (L., 1758) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) larvae were investigated. For this purpose, three different strains of H. bacteriophora were used. One of them was a hybrid strain (HBH) and the two were parents (HB1138 and HB4) of the hybrid strain. Three experimental combinations were conducted in the study conducted in 2019 under laboratory conditions in Bursa, Turkey: (A) plant roots, larvae and control; (B) plant roots, control I and control II; and (C) mechanically damaged plant roots, control-I and control-II in Y-tube olfactometers filled with moist sand. The results indicated that for combination A, most orientation to plants and larvae was seen in HB1138; for combination B, most orientation to plant roots was was seen in HBH; and for combination C, strain HB4 showed the most orientation to mechanically damaged plant roots. According to the results, each strain of the same EPN species may have a different response to plant roots and host insects.

Özet

Entomopatojen nematodlar (EPN'ler) türlere bağlı olarak, birbirinden farklı konukçu bulma davranışlarına sahiptirler. Konukçu arama davranışlarının yanı sıra, bazı EPN'lerin topraktaki yönelimleri bitki köklerine bağlı olarak değişebilir. Bursa’da laboratuvar koşullarında 2019 yılında yapılan bu çalışmada bazı Heterorhabditis bacteriophora (Poinar, 1976) (Rhabditida: Heterorhabditidae) ırklarının İngiliz çimi Lolium perenne L. (Poales: Poaceae) köklerine ve Petek Güvesi Galleria mellonella (L., 1758) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) larvalarına yönelimleri araştırılmıştır. Bu amaçla, üç farklı H. bacteriophoraırkı kullanılmıştır. Bunlardan birisi hibrit tür (HBH) diğer ikisi ise hibrid türün ebeveynidir (HB1138, HB4). Çalışma, üç farklı deneysel kombinasyon ile laboratuvar koşullarında yapılmıştır. Y-Olfaktometre düzeneğinde A kombinasyonu bitki kökleri, larvalar ve kontrol; B kombinasyonu bitki kökleri, kontrol-I ve kontrol-II; C kombinasyonu ise mekanik olarak yaralanmış bitki kökleri, kontrol-I ve kontrol-II bölümlerini içermektedir. Elde edilen sonuçlar; Kombinasyon A'da bitki köklerine ve böcek larvalarına karşı en yüksek yönelimi HB1138 göstermiştir. Kombinasyon B'de bitki köklerine en yüksek yönelimi HBH ve kombinasyon C'de mekanik olarak yaralı bitki köklerine en yüksek yönelimi HB4 sergilemiştir. Bu çalışmada, aynı türe ait farklı EPN ırklarının bitki köklerine ve konukçu böceklere yönelimi değişebileceği tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIRIM, S., ŞAHIN, Y. S., SUSURLUK, A. (2019). Orientation of some Heterorhabditis bacteriophora (Poinar, 1976) (Rhabditida: Heterorhabditidae) strains to Lolium perenne L. (Poales: Poaceae) and Galleria mellonella (L., 1758) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Türkiye Entomoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 4, 409–416. https://ajindex.com/articles/93042

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Ali, J. G., H. T. Alborn & L. L. Stelinski, 2010. Subterranean herbivore-induced volatiles released by citrus roots upon feeding by Diaprepes abbreviatus recruit entomopathogenic nematodes. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 36 (4): 361-368.
  2. Anbesse, S. & R. U. Ehlers, 2013. Heterorhabditis sp. not attracted to synthetic (E)-β-caryophyllene, a volatile emitted by roots upon feeding by corn rootworm. Journal of Applied Entomology, 137 (1-2): 88-96.
  3. Bal, H. K. & P. S. Grewal, 2015. Lateral dispersal and foraging behavior of entomopathogenic nematodes in the absence and presence of mobile and non-mobile hosts. PloS ONE, 10 (6): e0129887. Boemare, N. E., R. J. Akhurst & R. G. Mourant, 1993. DNA relatedness between Xenorhabdus spp. (Enterobacteriaceae), symbiotic bacteria of entomopathogenic nematodes, and a proposal to transfer Xenorhabdus luminescens to a new genus, Photorhabdus gen. nov. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 43 (2): 249-255.
  4. Boff, M. I. C., R. H. W. M. Van Tol & P. H. Smits, 2002. Behavioural response of Heterorhabditis megidis towards plant roots and insect larvae. Biocontrol, 47 (1): 67-83.
  5. Boff, M. I., F. C. Zoon & P. H. Smits, 2001. Orientation of Heterorhabditis megidis to insect hosts and plant roots in a Y-tube sand olfactometer. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 98 (3): 329-337.
  6. Campbell, J. F. & R. Gaugler, 1993. Nictation behaviour and its ecological implications in the host search strategies of entomopathogenic nematodes (Heterorhabditidae and Steinernematidae). Behaviour, 155-169.
  7. Cobb, N. A., 1918. Estimating the Nematode Population of the Soil. Agricultural Technology Circular 1, Bureau of Plant Industry, United States Department of Agriculture, 48 pp. Ehlers, R. U., 2001. Mass production of entomopathogenic nematodes for plant protection. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 56 (5-6): 623-633.
  8. Grewal, P. S., E. E. Lewis, R. Gaugler & J. F. Campbell, 1994. Host finding behaviour as a predictor of foraging strategy in entomopathogenic nematodes. Parasitology, 108 (2): 207-215.
  9. Kaya, H. K. & R. Gaugler, 1993. Entomopathogenic nematodes. Annual Review of Entomology, 38 (1): 181-206.
  10. Kaya, H. K. & S. P. Stock, 1997. “Techniques in Insect Nematology, 281-324”. In: Manual of Techniques in Insect Pathology (Ed. L. A. Lacey). Academic Press,
  11. San Diego, CA, USA, 409 pp. Klein, B. M. Z., G. L. Wiegers & P. H. Smits, 1994. Biological control of cockchafer larvae (Melolontha melolontha) with the entomopatho