Journals / Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2

A Research On Determination Barriers to Innovation in Rural Tourism Enterprises

Kırsal Turizm İşletmelerinde Yenilik Engellerinin Belirlenmesi Üzerine Bir Araştırma

Pages
340–353
Publication Date
2019-07-24
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, there is a significant difference between species of enterprises, ownership status, occupancy rate, period of operation and types of innovation in enterprise and the perception of innovation barriers as the characteristics of the business.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this research is to determine the perception of rural tourism managers to innovation barriers.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Furthermore it was tried to determine the relationship between the demographic characteristics of the managers, characteristics of enterprises and the perception of innovation barriers.Findings obtained from the research determined that; while the highest average of the perception to innovation barriers regarding to “Innovate in our business involves high risk in terms of cost” expression in intra-business, “I think that the bureaucracy is high in all the supports (financial, legal, etc.) of the state which have an impact on innovation” in extra-business.As a result of the tested hypotheses; there is no significant difference between the age of the managers and the perception of innovation barriers, on the other hand there is a significant difference between the gender, educational level, tourism education, experience in the enterprises, sector experience and the perception of innovation barriers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, there is a significant difference between species of enterprises, ownership status, occupancy rate, period of operation and types of innovation in enterprise and the perception of innovation barriers as the characteristics of the business.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:yenilik · yenilik engelleri · kırsal turizm

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to determine the perception of rural tourism managers to innovation barriers. Furthermore it was tried to determine the relationship between the demographic characteristics of the managers, characteristics of enterprises and the perception of innovation barriers.Findings obtained from the research determined that; while the highest average of the perception to innovation barriers regarding to “Innovate in our business involves high risk in terms of cost” expression in intra-business, “I think that the bureaucracy is high in all the supports (financial, legal, etc.) of the state which have an impact on innovation” in extra-business.As a result of the tested hypotheses; there is no significant difference between the age of the managers and the perception of innovation barriers, on the other hand there is a significant difference between the gender, educational level, tourism education, experience in the enterprises, sector experience and the perception of innovation barriers. In addition, there is a significant difference between species of enterprises, ownership status, occupancy rate, period of operation and types of innovation in enterprise and the perception of innovation barriers as the characteristics of the business.

Özet

Araştırmanın temel amacı; kırsal turizm işletmecilerinin yenilik engellerine yönelik algılarının belirlenmesidir. Ayrıca araştırmada işletmecilerin demografik özellikleri ve işletme özellikleri değişkenleri ile yenilik engelleri algısı arasındaki farklılıklar belirlenmeye çalışılmıştır. Araştırmadan elde edilen bulgularda; işletme içi yenilik engelleri algılarında en yüksek ortalama “İşletmemizde yenilik yapmak, maliyet açısından yüksek risk içermektedir” ifadesine aitken, işletme dışı yenilik engellerinde en yüksek ortalama “Devletin yenilik üzerine etkisi olan tüm desteklerinde (finansal, hukuksal vb.) bürokrasinin yüksek olduğunu düşünüyorum” ifadesine ait olduğu belirlenmiştir. Test edilen hipotezler sonucunda; işletmecilerin demografik özelliklerinden yaş değişkeni ile yenilik engelleri algısı arasında anlamlı bir farklılık bulunmazken; cinsiyet, eğitim durumu, turizm eğitimi alma durumu, işletmede çalışma süresi, turizm işletmelerinde çalışma süresi değişkenleri arasında anlamlı bir farklılık bulunmaktadır sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Ayrıca, işletme özelliklerinden olan, işletmenin türü, sahiplik durumu, doluluk oranı, faaliyet dönemi ve işletmede yapılan yenilik türleri değişkenleri ile yenilik engelleri arasında anlamlı bir farklılık bulunmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERÖZ, S. S. (2019). A Research On Determination Barriers to Innovation in Rural Tourism Enterprises. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2, 340–353. https://ajindex.com/articles/929025

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Anamaria, R. ve Maria-Cristina, I. (2013), “Consumers Perception on Innovation in the Tourism Value Chain”. The Annals of The University of Oradea, s.815-824.
  2. Baldwin J. ve Lin Z. (2002), “Impediments to Advanced Technology Adoption for Canadian Manufacturers”, Research Policy 31, s.1-18.
  3. Benavente, J. M. (2006), “The Role of Research and Innovation in Promoting Productivity in Chile”, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 15(4/5), s.301–315.
  4. Birgit P., Mike P. ve Chung-Shing C. (2018), “Needs, Drivers and Barriers of Innovation: The Case of an Alpine Community-Model Destination”, Tourism Management Perspectives, Vol. 25, s.53-63.
  5. Bogliacino F. ve Pianta M. (2010),
  6. Profits, R&D and Innovation: a Model and a Test. JRC Technical Notes, Ipts Working Paperon Corporate R&D And Innovation - No. 05, Publications Office of the European Union. Chang, S., Gong, Y. ve Shum, C. (2011), “Promoting Innovation in Hospitality Companies through Human Resource Management Practices”, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30 (4), s.812-818.
  7. Chen B. T. (2017), “Service Innovation Performance in the Hospitality Industry: The Role of Organizational Training, Personal-Job Fit and Work Schedule Flexibility”, Journal of Hospitality Marketing& Management, 26:5, s.474-488.
  8. Christie M. ve Jurado R. G. (2009), “Barriers to Innovation in Online Pedagogy”, European Journal of Engineering Education, 34:3, s.273-279.
  9. Demirbas D., Hussain J. G. ve Harry M. (2011), “Owner-Managers’ Perceptions of Barriers to Innovation: Empirical Evidence From Turkish SMEs”, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, Vol. 18, No. 4, s.764-780.
  10. Freel, M. S. (2000), “Barriers to Product Innovation in Small Manufacturing Firms”, International Small Business Journal, 18 (2), s.60-80.
  11. Grant, D. (2016),
  12. Barriers to Public Sector Innovation, Doctoral Thesis, Northumbria University. Hadjimanolis, A. (1999), “Barriers To Innovation For SMEs In A Small Less Developed Country (Cyprus)”. Technovation, Vol.19, No. 9, s.561-570.
  13. Hall B. H., Lotti F. ve Mairesse J. (2009), “Innovation and Productivity in SMEs: Empirical Evidence for Italy”, Small Business Economics, 33, s.13-33.
  14. Liang-Hung L. ve Iuan-Yuan L. (2007), “Product Quality as A Determinant of Product Innovation: An Empirical Analysis of The Global Automotive Industry”, Total Quality Management&Business Excellence, 17:2, s.141-147.
  15. Liangxing S., Xiangyu W., Hongyi S. ve Zhen H. (2016), “The Impact of Technological Innovation on Product