Journals / İzmir İktisat Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 2

The Effect of Organizational Identification on Counterproductive Work Behaviors: The Mediating Role of Psychological Well-Being

Örgütsel Özdeşleşmenin Üretkenlik Karşıtı İş Davranışları Üzerine Etkisi: Psikolojik İyi Oluşun Aracı Rolü

Pages
357–374
Publication Date
2020-06-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In line with this result, it is possible to claim that organizational identification reduces counterproductive work behaviors through psychological well-being.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this research is to determine the role of psychological well-being in the impact of organizational identification that explains the integration of the organization with its goals and objectives on counterproductive work behaviors involving attitudes and behaviors that are undesirable and to be prevented in organizations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this sense, expectation that the mitigating effect of organizational identification of counterproductivity work behaviors can occur through psychological well-being is the starting point of the research. 290 employees contributed to this research on health-care professionals operating in Nevsehir province.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In line with this result, it is possible to claim that organizational identification reduces counterproductive work behaviors through psychological well-being.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Örgütsel Özdeşleşme · Üretkenlik Karşıtı İş Davranışları · Psikolojik İyi Oluş

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to determine the role of psychological well-being in the impact of organizational identification that explains the integration of the organization with its goals and objectives on counterproductive work behaviors involving attitudes and behaviors that are undesirable and to be prevented in organizations. Psychological well-being, which represents one of the most important parts of the psychological function, explains the individual's desire for self-realization, autonomy and personal development. In this sense, expectation that the mitigating effect of organizational identification of counterproductivity work behaviors can occur through psychological well-being is the starting point of the research. 290 employees contributed to this research on health-care professionals operating in Nevsehir province. As a result of the research, it has been determined that psychological well-being plays a full mediating role in the relationship between organizational identification and the undesirable counterproductive work behaviors that have a great importance for organizations. In line with this result, it is possible to claim that organizational identification reduces counterproductive work behaviors through psychological well-being.

Özet

Çalışanların örgütün amaç ve hedefleri ile bütünleşmesini ifade eden örgütsel özdeşleşmenin, örgütlerde istenmeyen ve önlenmesi gereken tutum ve davranışları içeren üretkenlik karşıtı iş davranışları üzerine etkisinde psikolojik iyi oluşun nasıl bir rol üstlendiğinin belirlenmesi araştırmanın amacını oluşturmaktadır. Psikolojik işlevin en önemli parçalarından birini temsil eden psikolojik iyi oluş bireyin kendini gerçekleştirmeye yönelik isteği, özerkliği ve kişisel gelişimine yönelik çabalarını ifade etmektedir. Bu anlamda örgütsel özdeşleşmenin üretkenlik karşıtı iş davranışları üzerine azaltıcı etkisinin psikolojik iyi oluş üzerinden gerçekleşebileceğine ilişkin beklenti araştırmanın çıkış noktasını oluşturmaktadır. Nevşehir ilinde faaliyet gösteren sağlık kuruluşu çalışanları üzerine yapılan bu araştırmaya 290 çalışan katkı sağlamıştır. Araştırma sonucunda örgütsel özdeşleşme ile örgütler için büyük önem arz eden ve istenmeyen üretkenlik karşıtı iş davranışları arasındaki ilişkide çalışanların öz gelişim, kendini gerçekleştirme ve yaşam amaçlarını ifade eden psikolojik iyi oluşun tam aracılık rolü üstlendiği tespit edilmiştir. Bu sonuç doğrultusunda örgütsel özdeşleşmenin psikolojik iyi oluş üzerinden üretkenlik karşıtı iş davranışlarını azalttığı söylenebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÜSTÜN, F. (2020). The Effect of Organizational Identification on Counterproductive Work Behaviors: The Mediating Role of Psychological Well-Being. İzmir İktisat Dergisi, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 2, 357–374. https://ajindex.com/articles/92452

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Ansari, M. E., Maleki, S. ve Mazraeh, S. (2013). An Analysis of Factors Affected on Employees' Counterproductive Work Behavior: The Moderating Role of Job Burnout and engagement. Journal of American Science, 9(1), 350-359.
  2. Ashforth, B. E. ve Mael, F. (1989). Social Identity Theory and The Organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20–39. Aubé, C., Rousseau, V., Mama, C. ve Morin, E. M. (2009). Counterproductive Behaviors and Psychological Well-Being: The Moderating Effect of Task Interdependence. Journal of Business and Psychology, 24(3), 351-361. Aubé, C., Rousseau, V., Morin, E. M. ve Langdeau, P. É. (2006). Les Comportements Contre-Productifs Dans Un Contexte De Travail En Équipe: Développement Et Validation D’une Représentation Multidimensionnelle “Counterproductive Behaviors İn A Teamwork Setting: Development And Validation Of A Multidimensional Framework”, in 14th Conference Of The Association İnternationale De Psychologie Du Travail De Langue Française, Hammamet, Tunisia. Avanzi, L., Van Dick, R., Fraccaroli, F. ve Sarchielli, G. (2012). The downside of organizational identification: Relations between identification, work holism and well-being. Work & Stress, 26(3), 289-307.
  3. Bayram, N., Gursakal, N. ve Bilgel, N. (2009). Counterproductive Work Behaviour Among White‐Collar Employees: A Study from Turkey. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17(2), 180-188.
  4. Bennett R. J. ve Robinson S. L. (2000). Development of A Measure of Workplace Deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 349-360.
  5. Bradburn, N. M. (1969). The Structure of Psychological Well-Being, Aldine Publications. Britt, C. ve Ravelo, L. (2006).
  6. Organizational Identification, In Merged Companies: A Comparision of a Colombian Govermental and a German Medical Institution. Marburg/Germany: Philipps–Universidad Marburg Doctoral Dissertation. Buchanan Ii, B. (1974). Building Organizational Commitment: The Socialization of Managers in Work Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19(4), 533-546.
  7. Cameron, J. E. (1999). Social Identity and The Pursuit of Possible Selves: Implications for the Psychological Well-Being of University students. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 3(3), 179. Cheney, G. ve Tompkins, P. K. (1987). Coming to Terms with Organizational Identification and Commitment. Communication Studies, 38(1), 1-15.
  8. Cilasun, A. (2016). Yükseköğretim Kurumlarında Pozitif Psikoloji ve Örgütsel Özdeşleşmenin Performans Yönetimine Etkisi, Doktora Tezi, Ça